Georgetown ANC Discusses ADU Concerns Amid Increased Noise and Privacy Issues

During the BZA Public Meeting and Hearing held on July 23, 2025, the Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) addressed significant concerns regarding a proposed accessory dwelling unit (ADU) in a residential area of Washington, D.C. The discussions highlighted the potential impact of increased foot traffic and noise on neighboring properties, particularly concerning shared easements and privacy.

The primary focus of the meeting was the proposal by Mr. Smith for an ADU that would utilize a shared easement, which raised concerns among neighboring property owners, including Mr. Sartorius. He expressed worries about the increased congestion and noise that could result from more residents using the easement, which is already a narrow access point for multiple properties. The board members engaged in a detailed dialogue about the implications of the proposal, particularly regarding how it might affect the enjoyment and privacy of adjacent homes.

Mr. Sartorius emphasized that while the easement itself would not be obstructed, the intensity of its use could lead to disturbances for nearby residents. He pointed out that the design of the ADU could lead to a loss of privacy, as windows would overlook private backyards. This sentiment was echoed by other board members, who expressed concerns about the potential for increased activity in the small alleyway.

In response to these concerns, Mr. Smith clarified that the additional square footage of the proposed ADU was intended to maintain the architectural continuity of the existing structure rather than serve a functional purpose. This aspect of the design was discussed in relation to the Old Georgetown Board's requirements, indicating a focus on aesthetic considerations alongside practical implications.

The meeting also featured testimony from neighbors, including Mr. Getzendanner, who highlighted the broader impact of the proposed changes on the community's visual landscape. ANC Commissioner Paul Masak provided insights into the neighborhood's mixed feelings about the proposal, noting that while some residents were not opposed, there were significant concerns regarding the potential for increased density and its effects on the area.

As the meeting progressed, the board decided to hold an emergency closed session to seek legal counsel regarding the case, indicating the complexity and potential legal implications of the proposal. This decision underscores the importance of thorough deliberation in zoning matters, particularly when community interests and property rights are at stake.

The outcome of this meeting will be pivotal in determining the future of the proposed ADU and its impact on the surrounding neighborhood, as the board continues to weigh the benefits of increased housing options against the need to preserve the character and privacy of established residential areas.