[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6482734,"mediaKeyId","5477918-fb3d00c65b7119e9bb0701ad32761496","parentId",5477918,"title","Grayson County Fiscal Court approves routine financial items, KYTC resurfacing resolution and purchase of 2 acres for EMS","audioSeconds",178,"startMs",313000,"endMs",491000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5477918-fb3d00c65b7119e9bb0701ad32761496&start=313&end=491","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5477918-fb3d00c65b7119e9bb0701ad32761496/thumbnail_313000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6482734/Grayson-County/Kentucky/Grayson-County-Fiscal-Court-approves-routine-financial-items-KYTC-resurfacing-resolution-and-purchase-of-2-acres-for-EMS","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6482734-73c30a8c8e0c4f90e6fdb7e2c56f236c/orig.mp4?Expires=1774871102&Signature=OhaQyzI4sjpAK-bb8UNScvzayY9Zfg78JnBHVs66F92OQ1mdaQSi4Aag-gBdz3VLZNFTrPzPEMm6TylCp8TcLToGhDW6Wx0cWNN5ypiiMvJHHMxNqmzV8aVO~NMGtiHFqtONLIjVZiG-LKDeHqIRUkficnBHHjnt9AtTDv0oMLQBPDAkMqeP-seQ0T6Vt-saECK7K9EsCWUgwaBPCn3es-ODPa-EjzbWvluUc6l7xi0jKppTOtqJ~z5nsFSPlERsHPgwJUCevre9O8kaRXN8D6kp0WkCWg~CDj3VLf4lafZRXmBQRMRWUxAyTlKK0W2qJCMs4RFREzqcPgYKvty--A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Grayson County","date","2025-07-24T22:58:22.027Z","article","The Grayson County Fiscal Court approved routine minutes and a package of financial items, accepted its physical court audit for the year ending June 30, 2023, authorized a resurfacing agreement and resolution with the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet for Henry Blatch Road and Evely Road, and voted to purchase a 2‑acre tract beside the new EMS office for $30,000.

Votes at a glance

- Approval of minutes from the previous meeting — motion by Darren; second by Ben; outcome: approved.
- Approval of payment of bills — motion by Bridal; second by Brenda; outcome: approved.
- Treasurer’s budget transfers (as presented) — motion by Neil; second by Jason; outcome: approved.
- Treasurer’s monthly settlement — motion by Darren; second by Brenda; outcome: approved.
- Treasurer’s quarterly settlement — motion by Benham; second by Brenda; outcome: approved.
- Treasurer’s annual settlement for 07/01/2024–06/30/2025 — motion by Darren; second by Brian; outcome: approved.
- Acceptance of Grayson County physical court audit for year ending 06/30/2023 — motion by Ben; second by Neal; outcome: approved.
- Approval of agreement and resolution with Kentucky Transportation Cabinet for resurfacing Henry Blatch Road and Evely Road — motion by Ben; second by Brenda; outcome: approved.
- Approval of updates to the Grayson County 9‑1‑1 employee handbook (minor updates to employee sections and vehicle use language) — motion by Neil; second by Darren; outcome: approved.
- Incentive payments — motion by Darren; second by Brian; outcome: approved.
- Jailer’s payment of bills — motion by Brian; second by Darren; outcome: approved.
- Jailer’s budget transfers (as presented) — motion by Ben; second by Brenda; outcome: approved.
- Sheriff’s monthly settlement — motion by Darren; second by Neal; outcome: approved.
- Sheriff’s 2025 second-quarter budget — motion by Ben; second by Brenda; outcome: approved.
- Purchase of a 2‑acre tract adjacent to the new EMS office for $30,000 — motion by Darren; second by Brian; outcome: approved (county to execute deed and payment).

Several motions recorded who moved and who seconded; roll-call tallies were not read into the record beyond the chair asking “All in favor?” and commissioners responding “Aye.” The court did not record individual yes/no votes in the minutes provided in the transcript.

Other business noted at the meeting included notice that emergency-management partners received grants to outfit a large mobile command trailer and that a county employee donated a Ford F‑250 to help tow the trailer.

The court adjourned after a motion by Neil and a second by Ben.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Grayson County Fiscal Court Meeting 07.24.2025","oneSentenceSummary","At its regular meeting the Grayson County Fiscal Court approved minutes, multiple financial settlements and transfers, accepted its physical court audit, approved a Kentucky Transportation Cabinet resurfacing resolution for Henry Blatch and Evely roads, and authorized purchase of a 2‑acre tract adjacent to the new EMS office for $30,000.","taxTitle","Grayson County, Kentucky","taxId",72729,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6482739,"Grayson County magistrates discuss implementation questions around Kentucky Senate Bill 63 for UTVs and ATVs",382,608000,990000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5477918-fb3d00c65b7119e9bb0701ad32761496&start=608&end=990","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5477918-fb3d00c65b7119e9bb0701ad32761496/thumbnail_608000.jpg","/articles/6482739/Grayson-County/Kentucky/Grayson-County-magistrates-discuss-implementation-questions-around-Kentucky-Senate-Bill-63-for-UTVs-and-ATVs","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6482739-9251b8f1e8af0ae9032ac62c07194494/orig.mp4?Expires=1774871102&Signature=TIAIRLQ4j~vSW9P8DFXnr0BNE1~5gsh9E-sfCj1ccfG7A7f2k6Og8OmQ2Yrh4FnRfBrYCXHE7fZJweNGC2meDDTO39~dy5zXUqpjmAymvBM4SrSACSsKs7uz0rzhg5~tMKi1LyJpSnorU74ENk5k5Z~DRnh0vYxVJOzOIuWtl8FYyEo9ji-GA92jWBCeFLVMBCU4PVG0pWsvp1buD8UDqKKj3c4Fq4vKglD6KTOLbwxxwUpdyupf0zub4M-AOEdoz2hSwgMkgZP2i-ycQ6RSKRtJliUASFu0Nrg9360jxA7AmhTztPPrT9Ntjm9Wq1ZnXV2QykiycmlgR~-BqRJThA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Grayson County Fiscal Court members and county staff spent substantial time at their public meeting reviewing questions about Kentucky Senate Bill 63, the state measure that enables registration and limited road use for utility task vehicles (UTVs) and all-terrain vehicles (ATVs). The court did not adopt a local ordinance at the meeting and directed further research before any local action.

The discussion, which began during the public-comment period, focused on specifics the county must decide or clarify if it chooses to allow UTVs and ATVs on local roads: inspection requirements, insurance minimums and availability, required safety equipment (turn signals, mirrors, horns and seat belts), annual registration and property taxes, and enforcement workload for the clerk’s and sheriff’s offices. Court members repeatedly said those details are not spelled out uniformly in the legislation and that county officials and attorneys are still reviewing how to implement the law locally.

The court’s approach was cautious. Magistrates and staff said some Kentucky counties have already adopted implementing ordinances and that others — citing Marshall County as one early adopter — have encountered questions after passage. A public commenter summarized the reason residents were at the meeting: “We’re just here for the Senate Bill 63. We just wanna see if it’s gonna be discussed,” (public comment, 00:10:08). Court members said they have asked the Kentucky Association of Counties to provide seminars and guidance and that they are consulting attorneys and law enforcement to avoid unintended liabilities.

County staff described operational consequences if the county moves forward: the clerk’s office and sheriff’s office would need to inspect vehicles, process registrations, and respond to more public calls; the sheriff’s office said enforcement and inspection demands could increase call volume and workload. Magistrates also raised questions about whether a local ordinance could be made more stringent than the state law or whether portions could be restricted locally; staff said they would investigate those legal limits.

Court members repeatedly emphasized they plan to gather more information from counties that have implemented SB 63, consult insurance carriers about coverage for UTVs and ATVs, and confirm whether the state law’s effective date and specific statewide registration rules leave room for local modification. They said the item is likely to be brought back for discussion at a future Fiscal Court meeting (the court meets monthly on the third Thursday) once staff and legal counsel have more guidance.

Because the court did not adopt an ordinance or take a formal vote on the subject at this meeting, no local legal changes were enacted. Members said any future action would be placed on a subsequent meeting agenda for public comment and formal consideration.","Magistrates and staff spent the court's public-comment period and part of new business examining practical and legal questions about Kentucky Senate Bill 63, which allows registration and road use of UTVs/ATVs; no formal local ordinance was adopted and the court agreed to research details and revisit the issue at a future meeting.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Grayson County Fiscal Court approves routine financial items, KYTC resurfacing resolution and purchase of 2 acres for EMS

Grayson County magistrates discuss implementation questions around Kentucky Senate Bill 63 for UTVs and ATVs