Residents Oppose New Chauncey ADU Ordinance Citing Neighborhood Concerns

During the West Lafayette City Council meeting on February 3, 2025, significant concerns were raised regarding the proposed auxiliary dwelling unit (ADU) ordinance, particularly its implications for the New Chauncey neighborhood. Residents voiced strong opposition to the inclusion of R1U zoning in the ordinance, arguing that it could exacerbate existing issues related to housing density and community identity.

Peter Bunder, a local resident, expressed his discontent with the ordinance, recalling past compromises made in 2011 that aimed to preserve the character of the neighborhood amidst rising urban density. He emphasized the need to address occupancy abuse and property tax fraud before endorsing policies that could lead to an influx of transient residents and investor-owned properties. Bunder warned that the proposed changes could further diminish owner-occupied homes, which are vital for maintaining community stability.

Katie, another resident, highlighted that New Chauncey is already significantly denser than other areas in West Lafayette. She presented a color-coded map illustrating the current rental and owner-occupied homes, arguing that allowing more ADUs would likely lead to a decline in owner occupancy and negatively impact local schools. She cautioned that the ordinance could inadvertently encourage the conversion of homes into student rentals, further altering the neighborhood's character.

Linda Peyton added to the discussion by comparing West Lafayette's proposed ADU regulations with those in Bloomington, noting that Bloomington has stricter limitations on bedroom counts and occupancy. She criticized the current ADU ordinance for disregarding existing zoning requirements related to green space and building coverage, suggesting that it could lead to overdevelopment and a loss of neighborhood charm.

The meeting underscored a growing tension between the desire for increased housing options and the need to preserve the unique identity of established neighborhoods. As the council considers the feedback from residents, the future of the ADU ordinance remains uncertain, with many community members advocating for a more cautious approach that prioritizes the needs of current residents over potential short-term gains. The council's next steps will be crucial in addressing these concerns and balancing development with community preservation.