[{"_1":2,"_122":-5,"_123":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74,86,98,110],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":56,"_68":69,"_70":56,"_71":72,"_73":72},"mediaId",6155532,"mediaKeyId","5475026-87447b30e878761904827e03c42339dd","parentId",5475026,"title","County staff say roof problems at jail under review after vendor attributes issues to other causes","audioSeconds",301,"startMs",7149000,"endMs",7450000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5475026-87447b30e878761904827e03c42339dd&start=7149&end=7450","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5475026-87447b30e878761904827e03c42339dd/thumbnail_7149000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6155532/Wichita-County/Texas/County-staff-say-roof-problems-at-jail-under-review-after-vendor-attributes-issues-to-other-causes","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6155532-94584ade9ec1678eeaa5b4477dfbf426/orig.mp4?Expires=1771193646&Signature=T-UKij3Jl4JJu5UK0DSAutAMUbVslX0F-fZ8yBET46kNzXgsLfOJVbXES6JWmB~vg7~WyF2yVE1pBnpI0vF9qn-P8yf~OPZoL4G1dmPvl5uInIekucDxywTFt~LPY4pL31W4T43fzNngRKAFvZPEuiiWSZSFFlgmr8mBohd-xzlF8TznhfGy6A2FsXd57bjto~4yPMDzvh~YmQS5AGU4JHCcR6E2s96FmYPqDsG-tHTOxj~1GcM4Qw0IACdi-tn2Xn-HoniVZ14EljvPN5gwcEEClQwEb9E6KowOrYqZIFAZ1iWlC9KxrenMeS9TUQ4zT0AxG5kZ69NKNG3w9EP-nA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Wichita County, Texas","date","2025-07-25T19:12:06.573Z","article","County facilities staff briefed the Wichita County Commissioners Court on roof problems at the county jail. Staff said the original system manufacturer/installer (referred to to the court) reviewed the roof and concluded that observed problems were not caused by the installed roofing system.

Why it matters: Commissioners and staff reported visible water intrusion in parts of the jail and identified the roof as the primary outstanding maintenance issue affecting the facility.

What county staff reported: Staff said Carlisle (the roofing reviewer named in the discussion) concluded that the observed failures did not stem from the vendor’s system. County staff said Linda from the county is reviewing warranty and installation documents and that the county is working with the architect and the general contractor to collect records before taking any insurance claim action. The staff presentation emphasized a careful, document‑driven approach before filing an insurance claim or moving to litigation to avoid unnecessary or premature claims.

Discussion vs. decision: The court received the status update as information. Commissioners and staff discussed next steps for documentation and whether to pursue insurance claims. Staff said they are continuing to gather installation records, warranty materials and communications with the design and construction teams and will return with recommendations. No formal claim or legal action was authorized at the meeting.

Ending: Staff said other jail systems and equipment are operating normally and that the roof inquiry remains the primary item under review; staff will bring additional information and warranty/insurance analysis to a future court meeting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Commissioner's Court 7/25/2025","oneSentenceSummary","County staff reported ongoing follow‑up after a vendor review of the new jail roof found no installation defect attributable to the vendor; staff said warranty and insurance documents are under review and that the roof, reported to leak in places, remains the primary maintenance concern for the jail.","taxTitle","taxId",2723,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":56,"_68":69,"_70":56,"_71":72,"_73":72},6155537,"County 4‑H agent reports record of events, volunteer strength and new youth preparedness programs",1551,5669000,7220000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5475026-87447b30e878761904827e03c42339dd&start=5669&end=7220","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5475026-87447b30e878761904827e03c42339dd/thumbnail_5669000.jpg","/articles/6155537/Wichita-County/Texas/County-4H-agent-reports-record-of-events-volunteer-strength-and-new-youth-preparedness-programs","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6155537-1f21645e6c5d9815441eb2e4a260a52b/orig.mp4?Expires=1771193647&Signature=LYwxWRd-2SGKOuVr28fDewfF6BAXKxysMQ8S6CCm~FJFnFRkQEX7TGcBdXAlTrTmskXUdSyZslKhbqnDuWxjiFgh~Zk-ZI1G5kiLnHyPWOVpRgx4oP22t7clkIyBYNk-hulGkH-CKqi2OapND1vmRXUta1pGnGbCq0tWuY0H-0ae9S7~EB4SDN2hcHH-UNdfHAa2eltowV~1Id8AjhvMWIojpFTeBcv1Pow50meXPtdSgxw1X8Q4C76tR3lL7eaX7~U5zkWNnjlD~kjfJK4T~nHNYz1J~U7xFccLRZkEY1u58xd~QTIQEdzUAVvLz1WxVF0mW-PC9wkl0NXln5wJfA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Katrina, the county 4‑H agent, reported to the Wichita County Commissioners Court that 4‑H enrollment and volunteer participation remain strong and outlined a calendar of educational activities and grants that support youth development.

Why it matters: County 4‑H programs provide youth with career readiness, STEM exposure, public speaking and agricultural education; volunteers are a key part of delivery and help sustain programming across the county.

Highlights and programs: The agent reported 228 enrolled youth, 44 registered volunteers, nine chartered clubs, and programming that included Keys to the Courthouse visits, classroom hatching (chicks), a financial literacy program reaching more than 200 students, and a robotics grant that supplied new kits for a club. Katrina said she secured an $800 grant to buy temporary animal pens for ag‑day school visits and a $2,000 grant (through a local sponsor) for robotics sets used in contests.

New preparedness curriculum: The agent said the office will run a 10‑week emergency‑preparedness program based on nationally recognized curriculum with FEMA components; participants will be certified, make household plans and be tasked to help several families develop their own plans. The county agent said emergency management staff and other local first responders will participate and that the program is intended to expand community resilience.

Volunteer and community notes: Commissioners praised the reported 44 volunteers and noted the program’s role in building leadership skills. The agent also said she received state approval for a staff promotion and will attend an agent conference and other upcoming community events.

Ending: Commissioners expressed support and appreciation for the extension office’s work; staff will continue to coordinate school and community partnerships and report back on program progress. No formal county action was required at the meeting.","Wichita County 4‑H reported 228 enrolled youth, 44 registered volunteers, multiple STEM and career readiness programs, a FEMA‑aligned emergency preparedness certification program and grants for robotics and temporary pens for ag-days.",{"_33":87,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":88,"_41":89,"_43":90,"_45":91,"_47":92,"_49":93,"_51":94,"_53":95,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":96,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":97,"_67":56,"_68":69,"_70":56,"_71":72,"_73":72},6155542,"Indigent health contractor reports enrollment, insurance‑discovery savings and expanded services",574,4908000,5482000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5475026-87447b30e878761904827e03c42339dd&start=4908&end=5482","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5475026-87447b30e878761904827e03c42339dd/thumbnail_4908000.jpg","/articles/6155542/Wichita-County/Texas/Indigent-health-contractor-reports-enrollment-insurancediscovery-savings-and-expanded-services","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6155542-d9fb9f90fe170554aa983de3ac33b3e0/orig.mp4?Expires=1771193647&Signature=ntjxTI89S6AUB6uojlJDamW80Zkui80MYpE2X7-S5e4nVCNdw1WMI8IGOoB4r1qIyoeJnsPJ8-1hry0kVT3uxli5~eAusgtU9k6W-stJzEFr-W9lFNR5cIarQgDIjnG2LRS083ngSRdWpgnYeZ~7tCzd4vvC175FDxNlgXLGYoatf92jS~c~F8WxpS7fRapt9DWzMYxHwba5jATyn66jqrjacbudXCmbu4PgxHu3GJIjDAezT7z1g0dnr4QfHNgua5mQ5aGRi0976uwQI~n7Ar3lMTubMn97bDSgVUW1Hc62nqWXnT1NMsa03cXmUtb-9EpwpL0c-z1AjUSsZn0iSQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","An Endogen Healthcare representative updated the Wichita County Commissioners Court on indigent health program activity, saying the contractor is managing care for the county’s enrolled clients, expanding insurance discovery to reduce county expense and adding services intended to lower long‑term costs.

What the contractor reported: The contractor said roughly 85 clients are currently enrolled for full coverage (primary care, specialty and prescriptions) and additional clients are on limited coverage pending paperwork. The vendor has implemented an insurance‑discovery program and said it searched roughly 177 client records and identified about 46 clients with other coverage; the identification of alternate payers means the county is no longer first payer for those bills in many cases. The contractor also said new partnerships — including a dental provider and a voucher arrangement for eyeglasses — are helping reduce county cost per client.

Why it matters: The vendor told the court the insurance‑discovery and partner programs conserve county funds previously paid for hospital transports, inpatient stays and expensive prescriptions. The contractor reported lower average prescriptions costs than in past years and said partnerships with a local pharmacy and hospital transition clinic have been important to cost control.

Discussion vs. direction: The briefing was informational. Commissioners and staff asked for clarification about reimbursement timing, the parameters for coverage (including the contractor’s stated per‑script cap), and upcoming community outreach events including a vendor booth for a “sober fest” and participation in the Texas Indigent Care Association conference.

Ending: The contractor said it will continue outreach and partner development and will provide regular updates to the commissioners; no formal budget action or policy change occurred at the meeting.","Endogen Healthcare reported 85 active county clients, an insurance‑discovery program identifying alternate payers, new dental and voucher partnerships, and lower prescription costs that the contractor said are reducing county expenditures for indigent care and jail transports.",{"_33":99,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":100,"_41":101,"_43":102,"_45":103,"_47":104,"_49":105,"_51":106,"_53":107,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":108,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":109,"_67":56,"_68":69,"_70":56,"_71":72,"_73":72},6155546,"Manufacturer explains waterproof elastomeric coating proposed for courthouse entry steps",1541,3359000,4900000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5475026-87447b30e878761904827e03c42339dd&start=3359&end=4900","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5475026-87447b30e878761904827e03c42339dd/thumbnail_3359000.jpg","/articles/6155546/Wichita-County/Texas/Manufacturer-explains-waterproof-elastomeric-coating-proposed-for-courthouse-entry-steps","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6155546-a8fe155e95b6329c0517edc419832940/orig.mp4?Expires=1771193647&Signature=YwVglxPVFT1yF2rCaLzVpaNayDrOvh62n~ejJhHSBEmzM9gVrf3watQgwErrnohCxaYbKy0w7DfXK011BhgjozEyVgVeKMg8BDeVjKJzrzvKjqSuUgLX0w2kLwHku8cXsAAPWd7lTSVunzpJpKwaspWeY8LYavXKUC1GRP0M8lVEy3lWKan8xPahiqclKw8TndA4bzJjG2plTyC1zOPUeGG-PbYwrKwyDh3QYdpWCvcje0mKOcyBV~asFZIXeW-LzDeKsuku3duOfVnFqNTKM9n9~ccN38M~M55L0j5heSGJorkf~Z3pfwpyx8XLRKI0QDxU6PMU3M6FJ~iaBZUI5g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","A Polycote Products representative and contractor briefed the Wichita County Commissioners Court on a proposed elastomeric waterproofing and protective coating system for the courthouse steps, saying the system is designed to stop moisture intrusion, provide a non‑slip finish and flex with concrete movement.

Why it matters: County staff and commissioners said moisture is penetrating the concrete steps at the courthouse and that the surface needs a durable, UV‑stable coating that will accommodate expansion and contraction without rigid cracking.

What was presented: The proposed system is a liquid elastomeric membrane (presented as a PC‑220 base membrane) topped with a wear coat (Polyglaze AL50) and a dry‑sand broadcast to provide slip resistance. The product specialist said the base membrane “is a tough rubber” that moves with the concrete and that the top coat will be the wear surface; installers squeegee and back‑roll the liquid material during application. The representative said curing is moisture‑cure based and that an economical cure profile is roughly 16 hours, with faster cure options available. The supplier said the system is UV stable and, with light pedestrian use, should provide 10+ years of functional life; the manufacturer’s standard pedestrian warranty starts at five years.

Prep, warranty and maintenance: Polycote stressed surface preparation — mechanical profiling or grinding to open concrete pores, detailed crack repair with polyurethane sealant, and then membrane and top coat application within the manufacturer’s recoat window to avoid delamination. The representative said if gouges occur from later heavy impact the installation will have to be patched and the top coat may be renewed without a full system replacement.

Procurement and scope questions: Commissioners and staff asked whether to include all stairways around the courthouse in the work; the contractor said the existing quote covered both sets of steps but commissioners discussed adding a third set for parity and future repaving plans. They also asked whether the vendor participates in cooperative purchasing programs (a co‑op could avoid a separate competitive bid) and were told the vendor would confirm.

Discussion vs. decision: The presentation was informational; commissioners asked technical and scheduling questions and requested a formal quote and confirmation of co‑op eligibility. No contract or expenditure was authorized at the meeting.

Ending: Staff and the vendor agreed to provide a formal proposal and follow up on cooperative purchasing options and scheduling; commissioners signaled interest in moving forward after staff reviews pricing, warranty language and scope.","Polycote representative described a liquid elastomeric membrane system for the courthouse steps, explained surface preparation, cure times, non‑slip sand broadcast and a five‑year pedestrian warranty; commissioners asked about UV stability, prep, and whether multiple stairways should be included in any bid.",{"_33":111,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":112,"_41":113,"_43":114,"_45":115,"_47":116,"_49":117,"_51":118,"_53":119,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":120,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":121,"_67":56,"_68":69,"_70":56,"_71":72,"_73":72},6155550,"Vendor outlines records-retention inventory, scanning and destruction options for Wichita County",2709,641000,3350000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5475026-87447b30e878761904827e03c42339dd&start=641&end=3350","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5475026-87447b30e878761904827e03c42339dd/thumbnail_641000.jpg","/articles/6155550/Wichita-County/Texas/Vendor-outlines-records-retention-inventory-scanning-and-destruction-options-for-Wichita-County","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6155550-0cc40e4aaeb915149266e164a339f7f0/orig.mp4?Expires=1771193647&Signature=GunEicS7M1EXVAzkOCKtHQeBejKrUeI1C8NmMJ8eZr-8IisYQdX84BqZtAWgzEGpvWl4vru1s4Mqu41Xuci4vApUMZZnChy~Ad4EkH0qyoAm5q2Z7CdEqRdWtBV7hcQPFhP1ZbHoeRPeZCtjtUF29nnvjHRTl7GBEIne-UCyRyfBmub8uuRnrKd2-~QxNrNYinZO~1klD3u17UVTt-kCbDcCAeej0CKqOcp8MBPwiNPuqoBgLIgQTSxtCdwzTkD~XhkgdX6AcWFIYpVAhMd3F2ylnofnnsHqE-s4QsWGItQ9ibQqDf3rtTqlrbZ6y~ceFyhX89D1zw8YeQDfmkqSZg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Chris Coriel, vice president of sales for Records Consultants Inc., told the Wichita County Commissioners Court the county has a large and mixed archive of inactive records and described a standard service that inventories, classifies, digitizes and destroys records by the box. “Our services are by the box,” Coriel said, describing the firm’s standard approach.

Coriel told commissioners his San Antonio-based company has worked with local governments across Texas and the U.S. and partners with the Texas State Library and Archives Commission on retention schedule compliance. He said the state maintains a set of retention schedules and related bulletins that specify how long record series must be kept and that counties present a particular challenge because each elected official is a records management officer for their own office.

Why it matters: County clerks and other elected offices are responsible for retaining public records to meet state requirements, provide timely responses to records requests and reduce storage and disaster risk. Coriel warned that inactive records tend to accumulate and that many boxes are eligible for destruction under retention rules, while other boxes hold permanent material that should be digitized and preserved.

Key points Coriel reported: his on‑site walk-through counted roughly 350 boxes in some JP offices and an estimated 800 large-format probate ledgers and hundreds of deed and tax ledgers in another storage room. He estimated that scanning uncatalogued ledgers and other materials could run in the high hundreds of thousands of dollars — “probably three‑quarters of a million to a million dollars” if everything were to be digitized — and said a typical records‑classification fee runs roughly $30–$40 per box. Coriel said it is common, after classification, to find 40–60% of boxes eligible for destruction under state retention rules.

Discussion vs. decision: The presentation was informational. Commissioners and staff asked questions about which records had already been scanned, whether older microfilm had been digitized, and whether paper copies must be retained when an electronic copy exists. Coriel said TSLAC (Texas State Library and Archives Commission) allows entities to keep permanent records electronically when they meet the agency’s electronic‑records policies, but that entities must file an electronic records policy and a compliance certification with the state. He recommended the county work with TSLAC to confirm which materials can be retired as paper once an authoritative digital copy exists.

Practical next steps discussed: staff and the county clerk should (1) compile or confirm an inventory of inactive records (TSLAC Bulletin C recommends box‑level inventories), (2) determine which items are already digitized and where those files are stored and backed up, and (3) decide which series the county will retain in paper as a redundant copy versus migrate to an electronic master. Coriel offered RCI’s standard box‑by‑box inventory and classification service and estimated that performing an inventory on several thousand items already visible on the second floor (excluding the basement) would be on the order of $100,000–$150,000.

Ending: Commissioners accepted the briefing as information and discussed following up with the county clerk, the county’s IT staff and TSLAC to determine an agreed scope and funding path before any procurement. No formal action or contract award took place at the meeting.","Chris Coriel of Records Consultants Inc. told Wichita County commissioners the county likely holds hundreds of thousands of images across ledgers, deed books and boxed case files and outlined a phased, box-by-box inventory, classification, digitization and destruction service priced by the box.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

County staff say roof problems at jail under review after vendor attributes issues to other causes

County 4‑H agent reports record of events, volunteer strength and new youth preparedness programs

Indigent health contractor reports enrollment, insurance‑discovery savings and expanded services

Manufacturer explains waterproof elastomeric coating proposed for courthouse entry steps

Vendor outlines records-retention inventory, scanning and destruction options for Wichita County