[{"_1":2,"_110":-5,"_111":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74,86,98],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},"mediaId",6153878,"mediaKeyId","5490538-9ad7a711a8338ff70e3d4f2f0fccd416","parentId",5490538,"title","Plano approves 2025–26 HUD action plan; debate centers on grant to Texas Muslim Women’s Foundation","audioSeconds",78,"startMs",7351000,"endMs",7429000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5490538-9ad7a711a8338ff70e3d4f2f0fccd416&start=7351&end=7429","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5490538-9ad7a711a8338ff70e3d4f2f0fccd416/thumbnail_7351000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6153878/Plano/Collin-County/Texas/Plano-approves-202526-HUD-action-plan-debate-centers-on-grant-to-Texas-Muslim-Womens-Foundation","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6153878-2d2c146550818182f77f38eabc1f79ed/orig.mp4?Expires=1770414657&Signature=ha1wlj3vNKWRjS7LZQJ6TA3zFf7IXR-6N6ccWDUVbkjJ-e~7GF3ulcChviughW1lKpVan6E3kGlifdJ~xPQ3B7cMMG-gmQA0dZ8~0vl5utuhQ9s51Lo4crBxGFp~Ra1QRGVQDIBHtWnEQx8MvfSib8wNhLD-65WsTAs78~AliBKHVujR~lvTFwKYgIHrCb-qQzdcJfhE2DjmO~nRL5h5GlQ2ef7vFXxEfvDTb1jAUsl~ctmkPfQZtcRIMnxnFxzyA6QdS6fJKXsa98sAnQfOZas3ByTweKl25FkCgCdVrJOpcJkVH9dFwtuGrgD8L0C9QWKYLp0w9qvooAIBq115aQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-07-29T02:28:34Z","article","The Plano City Council on Tuesday adopted the city’s 2025–26 action plan for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME funds, voting unanimously to approve the list of nonprofit recipients and project allocations recommended by the Community Relations Committee.

The vote, 8–0, came after more than an hour of public comment focused largely on one proposed award: $36,983 in HOME funds to the Texas Muslim Women’s Foundation for services to survivors of domestic violence.

What the council approved

City staff presented consolidated-plan and action-plan materials showing expected federal grant amounts: roughly $1.6 million in CDBG and about $558,000 in HOME funds for the coming program year. The Community Relations Committee vetted applications and recommended allocations that include housing rehabilitation, tenant‑based rental assistance, emergency shelters and social‑service programs. Curtis Howard, Director of Neighborhood Services, said the CRC process includes staff vetting and that all awards require a reimbursement process with receipts to document eligible expenditures.

Howard described the award process to council: “When they get this funding from us, it's a reimbursement process, so they have to send in the receipts,” and staff monitors the grants to ensure the work meets the HUD program requirements.

Public debate: vetting, neutrality and constitutional questions

Supporters of the Texas Muslim Women’s Foundation (TMWF) told council the group serves survivors of domestic violence across faiths and ethnicities. David Kelly, a board member for TMWF, said the organization’s shelters and assistance are non‑discriminatory: “The majority of the people that we serve are not Muslim,” he said.

Speakers opposing the allocation raised questions about transparency, potential ideological ties and whether public funds may be granted to organizations with religious affiliations. Amy Beacham said she opposed the $37,000 award and alleged ties to extremist actors. Pamela Sardo urged caution and cited Texas constitutional restrictions, arguing city leaders must ensure disbursements meet “an at‑large public purpose.” Several speakers asked for additional audits, quarterly reporting and stronger contractual safeguards.

Staff response and process explanation

Curtis Howard and staff described the selection and oversight process: applicants submit detailed proposals that are vetted by staff and the CRC; organizations must document use of funds and are reimbursed after submitting receipts; HUD rules and the consolidated-plan framework guide eligible activities. Howard noted the city lacks enough emergency shelter capacity for domestic-violence survivors and that local partners provide necessary beds and services.

Council action

Council approved the action plan and the recommended nonprofit allocations, including the Texas Muslim Women’s Foundation line item, by an 8–0 vote. The agenda packet included an amended resolution correcting a typographical duplication of the foundation’s name.

Speakers (selected)

Curtis Howard, Director of Neighborhood Services (City of Plano, government)
David Kelly (board member, Texas Muslim Women's Foundation; nonprofit)
Amy Beacham (resident)
Pamela Sardo (resident)
Farell Virk (resident; board member, Texas Muslim Women’s Foundation)
Elizabeth Nangle (resident)
Morgan Collier (resident)
Christa Scheld/Shield (resident)
Lee Moore (resident)

Authorities

{\"type\":\"policy\",\"name\":\"CDBG and HOME program rules (HUD)\",\"referenced_by\":[\"cdbg-home-action-plan-tmwf\"]}

Actions

[{\"kind\":\"resolution\",\"motion\":\"Adopt 2025–26 action plan for CDBG and HOME programs with recommended allocations (as amended)\",\"mover\":\"not specified\",\"second\":\"not specified\",\"vote_record\":[],\"tally\":{\"yes\":8,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Includes allocation of $36,983 to Texas Muslim Women's Foundation; packet contained an amended resolution correcting a duplication.\"}]

Clarifying details

[{\"category\":\"grant_amount_CDBG\",\"detail\":\"CDBG funding for program year\",\"value\":1600000,\"units\":\"USD\",\"approximate\":true,\"source_speaker\":\"Curtis Howard\"},{\"category\":\"grant_amount_HOME\",\"detail\":\"HOME funding for program year\",\"value\":558000,\"units\":\"USD\",\"approximate\":true,\"source_speaker\":\"Curtis Howard\"},{\"category\":\"tmwf_allocation\",\"detail\":\"Planned HOME allocation to Texas Muslim Women's Foundation as shown in packet\",\"value\":36983,\"units\":\"USD\",\"approximate\":false,\"source_speaker\":\"Curtis Howard\"},{\"category\":\"funding_process\",\"detail\":\"Awards are reimbursement-based and require documentation/receipts for disbursement\",\"source_speaker\":\"Curtis Howard\"}]

Proper_names

[{\"name\":\"Texas Muslim Women's Foundation\",\"type\":\"organization\"},{\"name\":\"North Texas Food Bank\",\"type\":\"organization\"},{\"name\":\"Agape\",\"type\":\"organization\"},{\"name\":\"Catholic Charities\",\"type\":\"organization\"},{\"name\":\"City House\",\"type\":\"organization\"},{\"name\":\"Samaritan Inn\",\"type\":\"organization\"},{\"name\":\"Plano\",\"type\":\"location\"}]

Community_relevance

{\"geographies\":[\"City of Plano\"],\"funding_sources\":[\"HUD: CDBG\",\"HUD: HOME\"],\"impact_groups\":[\"survivors of domestic violence\",\"low-income households\",\"tenants\",\"homeless individuals\"]}

Meeting_context

{\"engagement_level\":{\"speakers_count\":10,\"duration_minutes\":55,\"items_count\":1},\"implementation_risk\":\"low\",\"history\":[{\"date\":\"2025-04\",\"note\":\"City adopted five-year consolidated plan earlier in the year\"}]}

Searchable_tags

[\"CDBG\",\"HOME\",\"Texas Muslim Women's Foundation\",\"HUD\",\"grants\",\"Plano\"]

Provenance

{\"transcript_segments\":[]}

Salience

{\"overall\":0.78,\"overall_justification\":\"Local government approved federal grant allocations and a funded charity generated substantial public comment on vetting and constitutional limits.\",\"impact_scope\":\"local\",\"impact_scope_justification\":\"Direct effect on Plano nonprofits and residents eligible for services.\",\"attention_level\":\"high\",\"attention_level_justification\":\"Strong public comment and unanimous council vote on controversial allocation.\",\"novelty\":0.35,\"novelty_justification\":\"Annual HUD plans are expected; public controversy over 1 grantee created local news interest.\",\"timeliness_urgency\":0.60,\"timeliness_urgency_justification\":\"Action plan sets funding for the coming program year; recipients must prepare reimbursement documentation.\",\"legal_significance\":0.40,\"legal_significance_justification\":\"Speakers raised constitutional concerns about public funding to faith-based groups; staff described HUD and procurement constraints.\",\"budgetary_significance\":0.25,\"budgetary_significance_justification\":\"Total federal allocations reported; individual grants are modest relative to the city budget.\",\"public_safety_risk\":0.05,\"public_safety_risk_justification\":\"Related to shelter capacity and services for survivors, but no immediate safety emergency noted.\",\"environmental_impact\":0.01,\"environmental_impact_justification\":\"Not applicable.\",\"affected_population_estimate\":1000,\"affected_population_estimate_justification\":\"Estimated beneficiaries across funded programs are in the hundreds to low thousands per year; exact counts by project not specified.\",\"affected_population_confidence\":0.40,\"affected_population_confidence_justification\":\"Staff provided program descriptions but not consolidated beneficiary counts.\",\"budget_total_usd\":2168000.0,\"budget_total_usd_justification\":\"Sum of CDBG and HOME amounts presented in staff remarks (approximate).\",\"decision_deadline\":\"2025-07-01\",\"decision_deadline_justification\":\"Council set the program-year allocations at the meeting.\",\"policy_stage\":\"implementation\",\"policy_stage_justification\":\"Funds were allocated and will be disbursed under HUD rules.\",\"follow_up_priority\":6,\"follow_up_priority_justification\":\"Staff must execute reimbursement agreements and monitor expenditures.\",\"fact_check_risk\":0.15,\"fact_check_risk_justification\":\"Some public claims about grantees' affiliations and past funding require external verification.\",\"uncertainty\":0.30,\"uncertainty_justification\":\"Future audits or legal challenges could affect payments.\",\"source_diversity\":0.75,\"source_diversity_justification\":\"Staff, nonprofit representatives and many resident speakers provided a range of viewpoints.\",\"stakeholder_balance\":0.60,\"stakeholder_balance_justification\":\"Council heard both supporters and opponents; staff explained HUD rules.\",\"alert_flags\":[\"missing_sources\",\"legal_challenge\"],\"alert_flags_justification\":\"Public claims about grantee affiliations and state constitutional limits warrant verification.\"},","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City of Plano - Joint Work Session and City Council Meeting | 07-28-25","oneSentenceSummary","The Plano City Council on Tuesday adopted the city’s 2025–26 Community Development Block Grant and HOME action plan, including recommended nonprofit allocations, by an 8–0 vote.","taxTitle","Plano, Collin County, Texas","taxId",2776,"location","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6153883,"Plano officials map zoning, design and permitting changes to comply with new state housing bills",148,2286000,2434000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5490538-9ad7a711a8338ff70e3d4f2f0fccd416&start=2286&end=2434","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5490538-9ad7a711a8338ff70e3d4f2f0fccd416/thumbnail_2286000.jpg","/articles/6153883/Plano/Collin-County/Texas/Plano-officials-map-zoning-design-and-permitting-changes-to-comply-with-new-state-housing-bills","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6153883-9ae06cfc4776fdb7e027cf1538688c99/orig.mp4?Expires=1770414657&Signature=gW~rZrWuy7t7bo4965Bk3dzfgO7RiAQ6H~I82CZg~REh-mv45qqhdajps5LTP4das96mAZHgXtBRKQmeRlMKM00H1-i0QxCPYiAo6xgDDR-LfDKlzeXk9GTKjhYFpBjYyV2U4fQs1WzogY5UGWYCdr7Lp4gTIODpydzC2XHtmYZ4oaecIzZ32raB0OPLtVM~rMh0ZAuze61zgJYQIBUSyNX5cfM5QNLgsjRJhN4pHNRnIME8E8yqv6XDeUJvpkiKRwXMqZq43ULmIBy4M~i-Ribp41ceerSQO6DcYp-LvQXT-Qo3~UHlzaYeGb1KOGhJnzbJP4HTBN~QM320wQ1cjA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Plano officials on Tuesday reviewed a package of zoning, subdivision and building-code options to bring the city into compliance with three recent Texas laws that take effect Sept. 1, including Senate Bill 840, which allows multifamily and mixed-use development by right in nonresidential zoning.

The changes, outlined by Christina Day, Director of Planning, would reframe where and how multifamily and small-lot single-family developments may be approved in Plano while seeking to preserve neighborhood compatibility, infrastructure capacity and the city’s economic development areas.

Day told the joint session of the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission that the three bills under review were “Senate Bill 15, Senate Bill 840 and Senate Bill 2477,” and that they “are all effective on September 1.” She said SB 15 permits limited small-lot single-family development on parcels of five acres or more that are unplatted and that SB 840 “allows multifamily also mixed use development in all the non residential zoning districts in the city, by right.”

Why it matters: City staff said SB 840 would change the city’s land‑use pattern across a large area — roughly 30 percent of Plano’s land area in staff maps — and limit several regulatory tools planners and councils have used to manage density, height, setbacks and parking. Staff flagged increased legal exposure because the statutes expand who may sue and authorize recovery of attorney fees for successful plaintiffs.

What staff proposed

- Small-lot single-family (SB 15): staff recommended creating a use‑specific standard tied to the statute that would require open space scaled to lot count, update subdivision plat standards (including alley requirements for lots 50 feet wide or less) and add a plat notation that a property is being developed under the statute. Day said these parcels are limited in number but “may be impactful to those places that it does apply.”

- SB 840 multifamily/mixed use in nonresidential districts: staff presented a mixed approach rather than a single citywide density cap. Where possible they would regulate intensity using minimum heights, maximum heights and minimum unit sizes rather than a single citywide dwelling-units-per-acre value. Day explained density rules are now limited by the statute and noted the city’s highest existing densities already exceed the bill’s 36 dwelling units per acre example.

- Dimensional and design guardrails: staff outlined a 45-foot minimum height (the statute’s baseline), a 25-foot optional setback standard, a 1‑space-per-dwelling‑unit parking cap and a prohibition on requiring multi-level parking structures. Day said lot-coverage limits are constrained by the law, so the city is considering stronger citywide building- and site-design standards for landscaping, façade quality and resilience that can be applied administratively.

- Noticing and signage: staff proposed targeted notice within 500 feet and outreach to registered neighborhood groups within 1,500 feet, and signage that explains a site is being developed under the new state rules.

Design and green-building options

The staff asked whether to adopt a green-building baseline now. Salso Mata, Chief Building Official, summarized advantages and limitations of both LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) and the International Green Construction Code (IgCC). Mata said LEED offers “an established, brand marketability” and “a flexible credit system,” but “LEED is expensive” and “it’s a voluntary process, but if we adopted it, it would no longer be voluntary.” About the green code he said it is “legally enforceable” and integrates with the International Code Council family but that local staff currently have less experience administering it.

Commission and council feedback

Planning and Zoning recommended several items for the draft ordinance: establish minimum and maximum heights in certain areas, enhance landscaping standards, establish minimum dwelling‑unit sizes and ensure infrastructure capacity; the commission also advised removing multifamily as an allowed use in the Residential Community Design zoning district in certain cases and rejected carport-covered parking as a preferred option.

Councilmembers and commissioners raised practical questions: Council member Horn urged a sustainability baseline for new construction and conversions, arguing “we need to be more conscious of energy efficiency, water efficiency, and sustainability.” He also questioned blanket bans on balconies facing expressways, saying it should not “tell a developer how he can design and construct this building” but he agreed air-filtration and noise‑abatement standards are public‑health matters. Commissioners and councilmembers repeatedly pressed staff about whether LEED now (as an interim standard) or the green code later would best balance enforceability and developer costs.

Next steps and direction

Staff told both bodies they will prepare draft ordinance language for the Planning and Zoning Commission’s special meeting on Aug. 6 and a council meeting on Aug. 25 to meet the Sept. 1 statutory effective dates. Day said the commission held an earlier work session and that staff will “turn around pretty quickly this week and prepare ordinances for the consideration at a special called meeting on August 6.”

Discussion vs. decision

The meeting produced no final ordinance. The session produced direction to staff — to return proposed ordinance text addressing SB 15 and SB 840 (including design standards, minimum unit sizes, height rules and noticing procedures) and to provide options for a near-term green-building baseline (LEED) with a path to integrate a green construction code later.

Speakers

Christina Day, Director of Planning (City of Plano, government)
Salso Mata, Chief Building Official (City of Plano, government)
Council member Horn (City Council, government)
Council member Kerr (City Council, government)
Deputy Mayor Pro Tem (title used in transcript; government)
Commissioner Bender (Planning & Zoning Commission, government)
Commissioner Lingenfelter (Planning & Zoning Commission, government)
Commissioner Bernhardt (Planning & Zoning Commission, government)
Commissioner Bronski (Planning & Zoning Commission, government)
Commissioner Bonski (Planning & Zoning Commission, government)
Commissioner Ollie (Planning & Zoning Commission, government)
Commissioner Tong (Planning & Zoning Commission, government)
Commissioner Alali (Planning & Zoning Commission, government)
Council member Quintanilla (City Council, government)
(Transcript used repeated institutional labels for some speakers; quotes and attributions in this piece appear only from the above named speakers.)

Authorities

{\"type\":\"statute\",\"name\":\"Senate Bill 840\",\"referenced_by\":[\"article text\"]}
{\"type\":\"statute\",\"name\":\"Senate Bill 15\",\"referenced_by\":[\"article text\"]}
{\"type\":\"statute\",\"name\":\"Senate Bill 2477\",\"referenced_by\":[\"article text\"]}
{\"type\":\"other\",\"name\":\"LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design)\",\"referenced_by\":[\"article text\"]}
{\"type\":\"other\",\"name\":\"International Green Construction Code (IgCC)\",\"referenced_by\":[\"article text\"]}

Actions

[{\"kind\":\"referral\",\"motion\":\"Staff directed to prepare ordinance language to implement compliance options for SB 15 and SB 840 and return to Planning & Zoning (Aug. 6) and City Council (Aug. 25)\",\"mover\":\"not specified\",\"second\":\"not specified\",\"vote_record\":[],\"tally\":{\"yes\":0,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0},\"outcome\":\"no_action\",\"notes\":\"Direction to staff; no ordinance adopted at this meeting.\"}]

Clarifying details

[{\"category\":\"geographic_extent\",\"detail\":\"SB 840 mapped to roughly 30% of the city's land area\",\"value\":\"30\",\"units\":\"percent\",\"approximate\":true,\"source_speaker\":\"Christina Day\"},{\"category\":\"height_minimum\",\"detail\":\"Minimum height baseline under bill\",\"value\":45,\"units\":\"feet\",\"approximate\":false,\"source_speaker\":\"Christina Day\"},{\"category\":\"setback_minimum\",\"detail\":\"Statutory minimum standard for setbacks\",\"value\":25,\"units\":\"feet\",\"approximate\":false,\"source_speaker\":\"Christina Day\"},{\"category\":\"density_reference\",\"detail\":\"Staff cited 36 dwelling units per acre as a statutory reference and noted the city already has higher densities in some areas\",\"value\":36,\"units\":\"DUA\",\"approximate\":false,\"source_speaker\":\"Christina Day\"},{\"category\":\"parking_limit\",\"detail\":\"City may not require more than 1 parking space per dwelling unit for multifamily under the statute\",\"value\":1,\"units\":\"space per unit\",\"approximate\":false,\"source_speaker\":\"Christina Day\"},{\"category\":\"buffers\",\"detail\":\"Staff proposed a 1,000-foot buffer around heavy industrial uses and a 3,000-foot buffer around Airpark Dallas for regulation considerations\",\"source_speaker\":\"Christina Day\"}]

Proper_names

[{\"name\":\"Plano\",\"type\":\"location\"},{\"name\":\"Airpark Dallas\",\"type\":\"location\"},{\"name\":\"Legacy\",\"type\":\"location\"},{\"name\":\"Research Technology Crossroads\",\"type\":\"location\"},{\"name\":\"LEED\",\"type\":\"other\"},{\"name\":\"International Green Construction Code\",\"type\":\"other\"}]

Community_relevance

{\"geographies\":[\"Legacy\",\"Downtown\",\"Airpark Dallas\",\"East Plano\"],\"funding_sources\":[],\"impact_groups\":[\"homeowners\",\"renters\",\"developers\",\"legacy businesses\"]}

Meeting_context

{\"engagement_level\":{\"speakers_count\":15,\"duration_minutes\":28,\"items_count\":1},\"implementation_risk\":\"medium\",\"history\":[{\"date\":\"2025-07-21\",\"note\":\"Planning and Zoning held a work session; results included in the packet\"}]}","City staff presented draft ordinance choices after Texas laws that take effect Sept. 1 allow multifamily in nonresidential zoning and narrow local authority over single-family development; Planning and Zoning commissioners and councilmembers pressed for minimum unit sizes, building-quality standards and notice for neighbors.",{"_33":87,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":88,"_41":89,"_43":90,"_45":91,"_47":92,"_49":93,"_51":94,"_53":95,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":96,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":97,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6153868,"Plano council raises park‑impact fees for new construction after five‑year review",106,17930000,18036000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5490538-9ad7a711a8338ff70e3d4f2f0fccd416&start=17930&end=18036","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5490538-9ad7a711a8338ff70e3d4f2f0fccd416/thumbnail_17930000.jpg","/articles/6153868/Plano/Collin-County/Texas/Plano-council-raises-parkimpact-fees-for-new-construction-after-fiveyear-review","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6153868-a54631a6baa65da2b013795fe898487f/orig.mp4?Expires=1770414657&Signature=ip1bL9Imxxon1PSKFREzoeneRwjoOrA7KU8ADLrJUSFrrn4nz7QYlUFsXhzhcUZHcJXqSLNLLf4mc8EqRIxB2CTu4s9Oh3ybbLotQgm7bdhw~rXrY1NTVt~5GgiHCrvg6cah08pgEEIszpgJw22Ny-P4muieNOkIS6khMu664Fn~Ezd4waSRXfyN1QUMn8v0fdakhAiQ7AwSFOeXjxFZyLqZtsb8aXcZu6Xk9B1kIItKrZRieAfII5CXD7Cn9yOI3aUQ7P5NSJNN43xhGGw0N8R0LvUVqi7t4dhYhE6guyTeDl5RmT~i5cLctjadgnhentE8mGp0ClH4zM5FpXrTfg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Plano City Council on Tuesday approved an update to the city’s park and recreation fee ordinance, raising the one‑time per‑unit fee charged at the time of building permit to reflect higher land and construction costs.

Under the amended fee schedule, the proposed single‑family fee would increase from $2,065 to $5,691 per dwelling unit; the multifamily fee would increase from $1,400 to $4,359 per unit. The council adopted the ordinance change by unanimous vote.

What the fee pays for

City staff explained the park fee is a supplemental funding source dedicated to the acquisition or development of neighborhood and linear parks in one of 14 park zones. The fee is assessed at building permit issuance for new construction and remains tied to the zone in which it was collected; funds must be used for park land purchase or development that benefits the zone’s residents.

Dr. Smith, a parks planning official, summarized the methodology used to set the fee: the ordinance ties the charge to recent appraised land values and current park construction costs. The city reviews the fee every five years and used the same methodology that produced the 2019 schedule. Dr. Smith said rising land prices and construction costs explained the proposed increases.

Council concerns and staff response

Council member Horn questioned whether a flat per‑unit fee is equitable, noting that smaller, more affordable homes carry the same one‑time charge as larger homes. Horn said a flat fee “seems somewhat unfair that if we're trying to bring in more affordable housing, new development for a smaller house ... [pays] a significant amount of money compared to someone who’s building an estate in West Plano.”

Staff replied the ordinance calculates fees on a per‑domicile basis because the impact on parks is driven by population per unit rather than home square footage; staff cited an average of roughly 2.58 residents per single‑family home and 1.9 residents per multifamily unit in the city. Staff also said the park fee supplements bond funding and provides a mechanism to ensure new development contributes to the parks system it will use.

Council action

After discussion, Council approved the ordinance amendment 8–0. Staff offered to provide additional modeling if council wished to review alternative approaches (for example, fee schedules tied to lot size or other metrics) before the next scheduled review.

Speakers

Dr. Smith (Parks planning staff)
Katie (park planning staff)
Renee (park planning staff)
Council member Horn (City Council)

Authorities

{\"type\":\"policy\",\"name\":\"City of Plano park and recreation fee ordinance (codified; last updated 2019)\",\"referenced_by\":[\"park-fee-update\"]}

Actions

[{\"kind\":\"ordinance_second_reading\",\"motion\":\"Amend park and recreation fees: single-family fee increased to $5,691; multifamily fee increased to $4,359; fees assessed at building permit\",\"mover\":\"not specified\",\"second\":\"not specified\",\"vote_record\":[],\"tally\":{\"yes\":8,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Fee is one-time at permit; funds are restricted to park acquisition/development in collection zone.\"}]

Clarifying details

[{\"category\":\"single_family_fee\",\"detail\":\"New single‑family park fee proposed\",\"value\":5691,\"units\":\"USD\",\"approximate\":false,\"source_speaker\":\"Dr. Smith\"},{\"category\":\"multifamily_fee\",\"detail\":\"New multifamily park fee proposed\",\"value\":4359,\"units\":\"USD\",\"approximate\":false,\"source_speaker\":\"Dr. Smith\"},{\"category\":\"zones\",\"detail\":\"City divided into 14 park fee zones; fees collected in a zone must be used in that zone\",\"source_speaker\":\"Dr. Smith\"},{\"category\":\"fee_basis\",\"detail\":\"Fee calculated using appraised land values and park construction costs; reviewed every five years\",\"source_speaker\":\"Dr. Smith\"},{\"category\":\"per_domicile_basis\",\"detail\":\"City uses residents-per-unit averages (2.58 for single-family, 1.9 for multifamily) rather than unit square footage to apportion impact on parks\",\"source_speaker\":\"Katie\"}]

Proper_names

[{\"name\":\"City of Plano\",\"type\":\"agency\"},{\"name\":\"Texas A&M (methodology author referenced)\",\"type\":\"organization\"}]

Community_relevance

{\"geographies\":[\"City of Plano\"],\"funding_sources\":[],\"impact_groups\":[\"new homebuilders\",\"homebuyers\",\"neighborhoods receiving park fee funds\"]}

Meeting_context

{\"engagement_level\":{\"speakers_count\":4,\"duration_minutes\":30,\"items_count\":1},\"implementation_risk\":\"low\",\"history\":[{\"date\":\"2019\",\"note\":\"Park fee last updated; ordinance requires a five-year review\"}]}

Searchable_tags

[\"park fee\",\"park funding\",\"development impact fees\",\"Plano\",\"parks\"]

Provenance

{\"transcript_segments\":[]}

Salience

{\"overall\":0.55,\"overall_justification\":\"Update is a routine five-year fee review but with notable increases that affect new construction and affordability conversations.\",\"impact_scope\":\"local\",\"impact_scope_justification\":\"Applies to all new residential building permits in Plano and local park funding and planning.\",\"attention_level\":\"medium\",\"attention_level_justification\":\"Council discussed fairness for smaller/affordable homes but approved fee increase unanimously.\",\"novelty\":0.30,\"novelty_justification\":\"Periodic fee adjustments are standard; size of increase draws local attention.\",\"timeliness_urgency\":0.40,\"timeliness_urgency_justification\":\"Adopted now to align fees with current costs; next review in five years.\",\"legal_significance\":0.10,\"legal_significance_justification\":\"Ordinance amendment is a local budgetary/regulatory decision; not a regulatory policy change affecting land use.\",\"budgetary_significance\":0.35,\"budgetary_significance_justification\":\"Raises per-unit revenue stream for park acquisition and development but is not a major municipal revenue source relative to overall budget.\",\"public_safety_risk\":0.01,\"public_safety_risk_justification\":\"Not applicable.\",\"environmental_impact\":0.05,\"environmental_impact_justification\":\"Funds used for park acquisition and development could affect green-space outcomes.\",\"affected_population_estimate\":5000,\"affected_population_estimate_justification\":\"Estimate of new units likely to be built in coming years that will be assessed the fee; precise projections not specified.\",\"affected_population_confidence\":0.20,\"affected_population_confidence_justification\":\"Estimate not provided in packet; council asked staff to model alternatives.\",\"budget_total_usd\":0.0,\"budget_total_usd_justification\":\"No projected revenue total was specified at the meeting.\",\"decision_deadline\":\"2025-07-01\",\"decision_deadline_justification\":\"Council adopted the ordinance at this meeting.\",\"policy_stage\":\"implementation\",\"policy_stage_justification\":\"Ordinance amended and effective per publication clause.\",\"follow_up_priority\":5,\"follow_up_priority_justification\":\"Staff may provide alternative modeling at council request before next review.\",\"fact_check_risk\":0.05,\"fact_check_risk_justification\":\"Fee figures come from staff methodology and local appraisals; further modeling available on request.\",\"uncertainty\":0.20,\"uncertainty_justification\":\"Future development pace and land market changes will determine actual fee revenue.","City council approved revised park and recreation development fees, increasing the one‑time per‑unit charge for new single‑family and multifamily dwellings to reflect higher land and construction costs; council voted 8–0 after questions about fairness for smaller, entry‑level homes.",{"_33":99,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":100,"_41":101,"_43":102,"_45":103,"_47":104,"_49":105,"_51":106,"_53":107,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":108,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":109,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6153873,"Plano accepts fair-housing analysis and reviews housing study that shows affordability gap for workforce",821,9595000,10416000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5490538-9ad7a711a8338ff70e3d4f2f0fccd416&start=9595&end=10416","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5490538-9ad7a711a8338ff70e3d4f2f0fccd416/thumbnail_9595000.jpg","/articles/6153873/Plano/Collin-County/Texas/Plano-accepts-fair-housing-analysis-and-reviews-housing-study-that-shows-affordability-gap-for-workforce","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6153873-5ae520f3d5b73829aaadf6bb18fbfd4f/orig.mp4?Expires=1770414657&Signature=eIzrR88B-JOnahXhf3N3SkuqakecNhKDOvPyC0RAWn~b0dwTlVWzW-nvxs1K~QVZUzxaHkeEMrgD8tbBi~L-ZsZEQ1GSwcydDeYdgLZueUIkOgAv85gK3ctlZmo04K60NPW9wGO045lvBquk8f2jefjudKcjrZLpwItafdklwDu-~7OPjpnFZyI1SaUMGIYzziqltQ1F48FiJEau4b1MpmQIMmYr~lHgXrSQCN-LgCGEAVZA0iUMtaWFqFuu2aIOv~yQa9zo2GBARcpro68g3vJq23Hegu0MrDKjIITSMDYn3LGOxHNa0jYiDHcP0vTxJDR7cgeO6ope7DvYtFPybQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The City Council accepted a consultant report analyzing impediments to fair housing choice and heard a separate housing‑market study that found widespread housing cost burden among lower- and middle‑income households and recommended a menu of regulatory and financial strategies.

At a public hearing, RKG Associates presented the city’s Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. Summer Pan, RKG’s project manager, told council the findings show that “West and North Plano, which tend to have higher housing income, have the best fair housing opportunities” while “East Plano … faces more fair housing challenges,” including lower incomes, housing‑condition issues and limited access to resources.

Pan said complaints filed with HUD between 2019 and 2024 rose in 2024 and were primarily associated with disability, race and national origin. She told the council that non‑white applicants “face limited and less successful access to home ownership, home improvement loans, and refinancing in the private mortgage market,” and that Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in southeast Plano experienced a higher incidence of high‑cost lending.

RKG then summarized a separate housing study that measured supply, demand and “jobs‑housing balance.” Kyle Zolenti, RKG President, said the city faces a regional dynamic in which projected job growth and housing demand outpace production at entry and middle price points. “Housing is not just the issue of just folks who already live here, but folks who wanna work here or already do work here as well,” Zolenti said, noting that many local jobs pay less than $80,000 per year while much new housing targets higher price points.

Key findings and proposed next steps

- Cost burden: RKG reported that households earning less than $75,000 show widespread cost burden; the consultant said roughly 70% of renters and more than half of homeowners in that income band pay more than 30% of income for housing.

- Racial disparities and lending: The analysis documented higher rates of high‑cost lending and lower refinance/home‑purchase success among non‑white borrowers in some Plano neighborhoods.

- Recommendations: RKG presented options including housing rehabilitation programs, incentives or regulatory adjustments to increase diverse housing typologies, targeted homeownership counseling, and pursuing housing tax-credit applications. Staff said the city will expand housing counseling, provide materials in additional languages and continue collaborative outreach with neighboring cities and nonprofit partners.

Council action

Council accepted the Analysis of Impediments report; a motion to accept the report passed without opposition. The housing study was presented for feedback; no ordinance or funding decision was taken at the session.

Speakers

Shanette Eden, Housing and Community Services Manager (City of Plano, government)
Summer Pan, Project Manager (RKG Associates, consultant)
Kyle Zolenti, President (RKG Associates, consultant)
Curtis Howard, Director of Neighborhood Services (City of Plano, government)
Corey Reinicker (resident; community advocate)

Authorities

{\"type\":\"other\",\"name\":\"Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (RKG Associates)\",\"referenced_by\":[\"fair-housing-housing-study\"]}

Actions

[{\"kind\":\"other\",\"motion\":\"Accept Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice report\",\"mover\":\"not specified\",\"second\":\"not specified\",\"vote_record\":[],\"tally\":{\"yes\":8,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Council accepted the report; staff to pursue counseling expansion and other next steps.\"}]

Clarifying details

[{\"category\":\"complaint_trend\",\"detail\":\"Increase in HUD housing discrimination complaints in 2024 compared with prior years (2019-2023)\",\"source_speaker\":\"Summer Pan\"},{\"category\":\"cost_burden\",\"detail\":\"RKG reported about 70% of renters and over half of homeowners earning under $75,000 are cost‑burdened (pay >30% of income on housing)\",\"source_speaker\":\"Kyle Zolenti\"},{\"category\":\"jobs_housing\",\"detail\":\"Consultant identified that over 40% of projected jobs pay less than $80,000, while little new housing targets that price point\",\"source_speaker\":\"Kyle Zolenti\"}]

Proper_names

[{\"name\":\"RKG Associates\",\"type\":\"organization\"},{\"name\":\"Plano\",\"type\":\"location\"}]

Community_relevance

{\"geographies\":[\"Southeast Plano\",\"East Plano\",\"West Plano\"],\"funding_sources\":[],\"impact_groups\":[\"renters\",\"lower- and middle-income workers\",\"non-white borrowers\"]}

Meeting_context

{\"engagement_level\":{\"speakers_count\":5,\"duration_minutes\":55,\"items_count\":2},\"implementation_risk\":\"low\",\"history\":[{\"date\":\"2023\",\"note\":\"City engaged RKG for housing study starting in 2023\"}]}

Searchable_tags

[\"fair housing\",\"housing study\",\"RKG\",\"affordability\",\"Plano\"]

Provenance

{\"transcript_segments\":[]}

Salience

{\"overall\":0.80,\"overall_justification\":\"Accepted fair-housing analysis and a housing-market study that together identify racial disparities, cost burden for workforce households and policy options for the city.\",\"impact_scope\":\"local\",\"impact_scope_justification\":\"Findings affect city housing policy and HUD-funded programs; recommendations feed future work and funding applications.\",\"attention_level\":\"high\",\"attention_level_justification\":\"Council accepted the AI report and staff outlined near-term counseling and outreach steps; housing affordability is a persistent local issue.\",\"novelty\":0.45,\"novelty_justification\":\"Analyses confirm regional trends but translate them to local geography and policy options.\",\"timeliness_urgency\":0.60,\"timeliness_urgency_justification\":\"Report feeds the city’s HUD planning and any forthcoming regulatory responses to state law changes; staff signaled additional near-term actions.","Council accepted an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice and heard a housing market study showing widespread cost burdens among renters and homeowners earning under $75,000; staff proposed expanded counseling and regional outreach as next steps.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Plano approves 2025–26 HUD action plan; debate centers on grant to Texas Muslim Women’s Foundation

Plano officials map zoning, design and permitting changes to comply with new state housing bills

Plano council raises park‑impact fees for new construction after five‑year review

Plano accepts fair-housing analysis and reviews housing study that shows affordability gap for workforce