[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6153129,"mediaKeyId","5494335-ac19c9ae05ded494d22382ba7bd580dc","parentId",5494335,"title","Council tables police overtime agreement with Rochester City School District amid attendance and procedural questions","audioSeconds",368,"startMs",2668000,"endMs",3036000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5494335-ac19c9ae05ded494d22382ba7bd580dc&start=2668&end=3036","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5494335-ac19c9ae05ded494d22382ba7bd580dc/thumbnail_2668000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6153129/Rochester-City/Monroe-County/New-York/Council-tables-police-overtime-agreement-with-Rochester-City-School-District-amid-attendance-and-procedural-questions","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6153129-9539f6a11d3b14e813e4e0a845671258/orig.mp4?Expires=1776137724&Signature=TI8m79iMJipjF2zZy8~-aguxLoNpOA-U0liy8p5MlxKzuHjNdyjUSSRYLMO5gXkjCj~pM12aL4hIqOsE38O~gcmKaZjzwUu7MwVDfYdSROrLgOf7zGh~8wH0fLh8iTEKH7ANF~G-9Ls1UK1BpH7o4EdB8qdK2FeMmA3VEOrlNuMC9ZV4CUQGzkdtEgJxHXZn90VKmxVqxGUq7Jks6yikUi8PAOiDUvWF-lXWgnfBxZYioz7w-dLSKTUHc4QFZ--TtN6ekdIWVBMnHy4WeK~Tdnm4VyOb30NV9iHpkn-aEJa7FPwL0Vj5YcB63xgL4hwPobpd8YKFAHXj66bp2-IUWA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Rochester, NY City Council","date","2025-07-23T11:05:51Z","article","The Rochester City Council on July 20 voted to table Introductory Number 2-85, an intermunicipal agreement with the Rochester City School District to provide overtime police services during the 2025 summer school program.

President Miguel A. Melendez Jr. placed the item on hold at the request of council members, citing attendance limitations and procedural considerations. During a period of extended procedural discussion, Council Member Michael A. Patterson asked whether the item required a specific number of affirmative votes to pass; legal counsel and staff explained that some items require a minimum of five votes while other categories require a supermajority depending on charter or state law and council rules. A law department representative noted that council rules and Robert's Rules can apply to tabling and holding items.

After discussion, a motion to table Introductory Number 2-85 was made, seconded, and approved. The clerk conducted a roll-call on the tabling motion; President Melendez announced that Introductory Number 2-85 was returned to the table.

Council members and staff characterized the tabling as procedural; council members indicated it would be brought back when procedural questions about vote thresholds or attendance were resolved. The vote outcome left the agreement unapproved pending a future meeting. The administration and legal staff suggested returning the item to the agenda with clarified rules or when a sufficient number of council members are present.

The tabling came amid a broader set of items the council held or postponed because several pieces of business required supermajority votes and fewer than the required members were present at the July 20 meeting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Rochester, NY City Council Meeting - July 22, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The full council tabled Introductory Number 2-85, an intermunicipal agreement for overtime police services during 2025 summer school, after procedural debate about voting thresholds and whether the chair could hold the item; tabling passed by roll call.","taxTitle","Rochester City, Monroe County, New York","taxId",3654,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6153134,"Council advances lead-service-line project items but holds $14 million bond ordinance pending supermajority",422,1746000,2168000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5494335-ac19c9ae05ded494d22382ba7bd580dc&start=1746&end=2168","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5494335-ac19c9ae05ded494d22382ba7bd580dc/thumbnail_1746000.jpg","/articles/6153134/Rochester-City/Monroe-County/New-York/Council-advances-lead-service-line-project-items-but-holds-14-million-bond-ordinance-pending-supermajority","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6153134-a84ed1468fdcc3c18d121c665fcb88df/orig.mp4?Expires=1776137724&Signature=YCxoQBlp2QTADaq7hQoRPe9uvddlbtZxOpWjCnruyjmock8zJOM5U247sPQbQROTttBWiH2QmRdcD0bDk4gu5BoJf7DXNY35YIfOo~TAp8Qb-me6Y49tk7Lc9Eo5pKic4~~TTr4I8Vg1wHxkOPBbfgga1GjqqxSCiQzGpCKRkmKN1YT-D-S95K26rS~t413S81HKh7pkl3traKl6AMW2KUPwLwxn7wlmPN6PiDCVYvkmwtPvXNCzUFhZMkhhlEYTXidTMMbHDAvKExhKZEumrr2zl2TFf~fzlEtcT7P8NaZTD4FRfNdop2KO6r6O6YoL~S0NZ2sOQCXvO1Vo7EQCvg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Rochester City Council on July 20 approved professional services agreements and a grant appropriation to advance the city’s lead service line replacement work but declined to approve a related $14 million bond ordinance because the ordinance requires a supermajority vote the council did not have.

Council President Miguel A. Melendez Jr. presented the People, Parks and Public Works Committee’s recommendations, which included Introductory Number 2-69 (professional services agreement related to the lead service line replacement project) and Introductory Number 2-70 (grant agreement and appropriation under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law for federal fiscal year 2024). The council voted in favor of both items.

Introductory Number 2-71, a bond ordinance authorizing the issuance of $14,000,000 in bonds to finance a portion of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law lead service line replacement project (fiscal year 2024), was not taken for a final vote. President Melendez and council staff explained that the ordinance requires a supermajority, and because only five council members were present the necessary supermajority threshold was not met; the item was therefore held.

Council members approved the professional services agreement and the grant-appropriation items on voice votes; the bond ordinance will remain on the agenda until a future meeting when sufficient council membership is present to meet the legal voting threshold.

The committee also moved and the council approved other infrastructure and street maintenance funding items at the July 20 meeting, while several other projects requiring supermajority bond votes were similarly held.

The public record and committee report list project-specific actions and grant sources; the council did not adopt the bond issuance at the July 20 session.","Council approved professional services agreements and a grant appropriation for the lead service line replacement project but held a $14 million bond ordinance tied to the project because it requires a supermajority vote.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6153139,"Council approves larger state grant request after administration increases amount to $11.5 million",109,1925000,2034000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5494335-ac19c9ae05ded494d22382ba7bd580dc&start=1925&end=2034","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5494335-ac19c9ae05ded494d22382ba7bd580dc/thumbnail_1925000.jpg","/articles/6153139/Rochester-City/Monroe-County/New-York/Council-approves-larger-state-grant-request-after-administration-increases-amount-to-115-million","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6153139-9175e53da367fbbe69feec3aa4763dd4/orig.mp4?Expires=1776137724&Signature=X3R2pX~ac8vurUFFKZ1JNSTtMgux8SHCVRQWFWvaXEFS1l7YEEWOKrazjsuUX6VUyORYFdl1gCsI1TN4yGdLzNBVkyivdPDUXlHcz2g~ZlRR2UzK2dSZ70NyNqlAXrtIW4eprIH-tjqIFGGeaQZfb5aMcZtCD4v2gBrq4lJADeJGR0wO-GkIWuCElm22IF7eWnt~f1fp9nhFQ8eT1jPmD9w-Gy4JD8BZYG8bS~vJa2xY1Wso2juL0ilmCRp4MzJx4MEihRMbSrJ6WnUAQ0Fd56V9dA23iayIW6yAhlLrQWhyOrxbaHfyxnwqsbDjO1TFA3kjLerquTm8NBAol4stzg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Rochester City Council voted July 20 to approve, as amended, a consolidated funding grant application that increases the requested state funding from $1.5 million to $11.5 million.

City Council President Miguel A. Melendez Jr. presided over the meeting as the council voted on Introductory Number 2-63. The council approved the grant application after an amendment to raise the requested amount passed on a voice vote.

The amendment was offered during council discussion by Council Member Michael A. Patterson. A city staff member explained the change before the amendment was offered: “Something changed in what we learned we were able to ask for,” the staff member said during the meeting. Council Member Stanley Martin asked whether the change was clerical or substantive; the staff member repeated that new information made the larger request possible.

The council voted in favor of the application as amended. Council members did not record dissent in the verbal vote during the meeting, and President Melendez announced the motion carries.

The consolidated funding grant application was presented as a grant-seeking step; the administration indicated the action was limited to submitting an application and did not by itself commit city funds. The council did not debate specific programmatic uses in the published discussion recorded in the meeting minutes.

The application came from the Neighborhood, Jobs and Housing Committee's list of recommended legislation. The committee had placed Introductory Number 2-63 on the council agenda for consideration.

The council packet and the city website will contain the application materials and any subsequent appropriation or agreement if the grant is awarded.

For now, the approved amendment authorizes staff to submit a consolidated funding grant application for $11,500,000 in state funds, replacing the originally proposed $1,500,000 request.","The Rochester City Council voted to approve a consolidated funding grant application as amended to request $11.5 million from the State of New York, up from an original $1.5 million request; the increase was presented by city staff as a change in available funding the city could apply for.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Council tables police overtime agreement with Rochester City School District amid attendance and procedural questions

Council advances lead-service-line project items but holds $14 million bond ordinance pending supermajority

Council approves larger state grant request after administration increases amount to $11.5 million