[{"_1":2,"_112":-5,"_113":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6152865,"mediaKeyId","5496334-1f495bc84574b6cf0449bb5bff725f3f","parentId",5496334,"title","Board hears legislative update on state proposals affecting school aid and mental-health funding","audioSeconds",196,"startMs",398000,"endMs",594000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5496334-1f495bc84574b6cf0449bb5bff725f3f&start=398&end=594","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5496334-1f495bc84574b6cf0449bb5bff725f3f/thumbnail_398000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6152865/Wisconsin/Board-hears-legislative-update-on-state-proposals-affecting-school-aid-and-mental-health-funding","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6152865-26492cd0c4f5d60764937d1b598b7443/orig.mp4?Expires=1775462384&Signature=Zon3gZUE28VilCKBYuWipGNmhNEYQhrl3aSm-qNV-cDX0ncJzBOgl-GzpXjS-vCtLER5Wk0SnDoLtFwEjjlntC7tlsmWsK-tf~JhR3Uk8lYMMHshj~-Q6zoPfB9awhGir1UF7UvaKdLNdO626cdAnDodpb0ltGzBG1RuXZQMurjSDUsjoxI5HdrPnZSQEfyL8xUk1Zn8ZZVimDEKiG0NwWFWjcVtnHi5sBQC9bCDvK7RttlKDqltgNVTWSrzNi2XTfFvHjS8az5aLsf8GwmcEfwyRKIkW3RDN73soIz~ksWra5A0bBPL6UzYAAugU~JQuy~-JFcsqJgiq0-hgJnUMA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Green Bay Area Public School, WI","date","2025-07-29T12:26:19Z","article","District staff provided a legislative update to the Green Bay Area Public School District board summarizing recent state-level proposals and the district’s understanding of their status.

Key points: Staff said the state budget passed with “no new real money going to the schools,” and reported three bill groupings under consideration at the state legislature:

- Assembly Bill 354 and Senate Bill 341: Proposals to change the timing of equalization-aid payments to school districts by moving more of the payment to September and less to June; by the 2029–30 school year the proposal would move equalization aid to four equal installments. Staff said the bills had bipartisan support and were referred to the Assembly State Affairs Committee and Senate Education Committee.

- Assembly Bill 343 and Senate Bill 350: Proposals to expand pupil-wellness and school mental-health aid and to change eligibility for reimbursements under the state categorical aid program. Staff noted the bills were introduced in late June and early July and referred to education committees; staff observed that the bills appeared more partisan in sponsorship and that full support and opposition information was not yet available.

- Assembly Bill 339 and Senate Bill 347: Proposals to replace a current state grant program with a new categorical aid program for comprehensive school mental-health services, directed to school districts and independent charter schools. Staff said these bills were Democratic-led, had been referred to education and mental-health-related committees, and would change grant-based funding to a categorical aid stream for certain mental-health expenditures.

Staff described these items as newly introduced and noted limited information about full support or opposition at the time of the report. Staff said they will continue to monitor committee referrals and provide updates when additional information about the bills is available.

Context: The board asked no substantive questions beyond clarifying committee referrals and sponsorship. Staff said they would report back to the board if the bills' status changed before the next meeting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","BOE Regular Board Meeting 7/28/25","oneSentenceSummary","A staff legislative report summarized recent state activity: a budget with no new net funding for schools and bills proposing changes to equalization-aid payment timing and expansions of state aid for school mental-health services.","taxTitle","Green Bay Area Public School District, School Districts, Wisconsin","taxId",13047,"location","Wisconsin","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6152871,"Board approves revised Southwest High School logo to improve consistency and trademark protections",829,2771000,3600000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5496334-1f495bc84574b6cf0449bb5bff725f3f&start=2771&end=3600","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5496334-1f495bc84574b6cf0449bb5bff725f3f/thumbnail_2771000.jpg","/articles/6152871/Wisconsin/Board-approves-revised-Southwest-High-School-logo-to-improve-consistency-and-trademark-protections","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6152871-b70d032e9fa71c81bdec0615f13df02a/orig.mp4?Expires=1775462384&Signature=agYFsEGaQd5JQxz3U92SLK~0~mwYjLn76KeljRh8kOuIUHucy-ycoKNw4Tp6Y1bWaaWPOreih8FXbK3ZHQH7gvs-avcgAH6DNZW~avV4pSApSLjg4OxGePBMuMHn7SLXJOprYJuXStY13IL6tH6LSP66aO-7KQMQjoayaB1K25gaPsEgG79UZoldU8-tJWTx2mreCuYngoFlbuas4z0KXSxw4qZZu-bzHNAH492oJxOsMoMcgONEZ9W1uLdvLb7vv8RVspKBqRpJpnAGByM5vQWpcJ8vqpk~3YcGDMVlGRXei1OSPRx5isn3m2IgPkPRHKoy8U6ypIr0ZzHIgZYyzA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Green Bay Area Public School District Board of Education unanimously approved a revised trademark logo for Southwest High School following a presentation from school leaders about inconsistent colors, a boxed mark that produced a purple tone in some uses and practical problems for embroidery and merchandise.

Why it matters: Board-approved high school logos are trademarked by the district to protect students and school programs from unauthorized commercial sales and to give the district recourse against fake social-media accounts. School officials said a clearer, lighter “bridal blue” color and an inverted-profile Trojan mark will be easier to reproduce on uniforms, spirit gear and athletic facilities and will simplify future trademark filings.

School administrators described the review process: building leaders, an innovative student leadership group and alumni records from the school’s original 1965 materials were consulted. Presenters said the boxed version of the previous mark produced a purple hue on some printed materials and gym finishes; students and staff preferred the lighter blue and the revised outline because those changes made apparel-matching and embroidery easier. Administrators said the revised mark aligns more closely with historical color choices and makes mass-production and vendor matching simpler.

Legal and practical next steps: Staff said the district will put the new logo through the trademark process for high school logos and then update the website, social media and district merchandise as items are replaced or reordered. The district’s legal office said trademark registration strengthens the district’s ability to send cease-and-desist letters to retailers selling unlicensed apparel and helps direct proceeds from authorized merchandise to student clubs and booster organizations.

Board action: A board member moved approval and another seconded; online voting recorded unanimous approval. Staff said changes will be implemented as replacement purchases are made (for example, center-court floor work and future apparel orders) rather than in a single immediate rebrand to reduce costs.

Context: Staff noted the Southwest mark had been altered from an earlier design and that the boxed version had created difficulties when trademarking and when reproducing the mark on different materials. District staff said prior trademark filings for other high school marks had succeeded and that the revised Southwest mark should simplify trademark clearance and enforcement.","The board unanimously approved a revised trademark logo for Southwest High School after school leaders presented concerns about inconsistent color shades, a problematic boxed mark and merchandising challenges; staff will proceed with trademark filing and phased rebranding.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6152876,"Board approves use of independent hearing officer for expulsions after split debate",666,3822000,4488000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5496334-1f495bc84574b6cf0449bb5bff725f3f&start=3822&end=4488","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5496334-1f495bc84574b6cf0449bb5bff725f3f/thumbnail_3822000.jpg","/articles/6152876/Wisconsin/Board-approves-use-of-independent-hearing-officer-for-expulsions-after-split-debate","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6152876-42917ca6f21a2eea00db77ade433d294/orig.mp4?Expires=1775462384&Signature=mjfZ7yMb9SgLU8omeTpRRDwNfop8XMAU6QhiTEvvdB0al9QAA3yLEo~S-5Tv2MKSfAgWD9D0OSbeJuMRGpAIMtYGdz7YDoDPk8IR-p6qNrwdOeA37JoBB-Tr24b4ZtdD8tiW5oIvi9B8oIA3F0dO31PPuiZi3RXg~FsJRN0p4hioBQgLD3txwp5PSyHPbjnrSqSbX1OjaICmApNYoMI1dmk47iQLqpydTKdZdDmadKF3gRMHTReOeZPAoFEnn1x7YycAhVxhsqN-KGOIeMcfYj~8tDIreXY0JEf8Nh5m6RauSdvRgwd4INcqomM8CGCGRu0WQwCDOa4hiTFuXkLOtQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Green Bay Area Public School District Board of Education approved a resolution authorizing the appointment of an independent hearing officer to conduct student expulsion hearings. The resolution passed on an online roll-call tally with multiple board members voting in favor and two recorded no votes.

Why it matters: Board members debated whether expulsions should remain handled directly by elected board members or be delegated to an outside hearing examiner. Supporters said a professional independent officer provides consistency and timely processing; opponents said expulsion decisions are a core board responsibility and expressed philosophical objections to outsourcing.

The motion to authorize and appoint an independent hearing officer was moved and seconded and carried in the online vote. The clerk read the online vote results: Meister — yes; Canill — yes; Minnow — no; Gerlach — yes; Lyerly — yes; McCoy — yes; Becker — no. Two board members explained their no votes during discussion. One board member said he could not be “absolutely certain” the board should relinquish that responsibility and described his objection as philosophical; another said the public expects the elected board to retain that accountability. Supporters described scheduling and staffing burdens associated with board-conducted hearings, inconsistent outcomes when board composition changes, and the value of a trained professional to ensure consistent procedure and timely hearings for students and families.

The board confirmed the contract or authorization for an independent hearing officer is an annual arrangement to be renewed at the board’s discretion, and staff clarified the board retains oversight even when a hearing officer is used. Several board members noted that administrative support, legal counsel and consistent procedures reduce variability across cases.

Next steps: The resolution takes effect as approved; staff and the district’s legal office will proceed with appointment/contract administration for the independent hearing officer and will bring any required renewals or contract documents to the board for future action.

Context and process notes: Board members described expulsion hearings as time-intensive, often requiring many staff and external witnesses and taking place during school hours, which complicates board member participation. Supporters of the resolution said a professional hearing officer improves timeliness and consistency; dissenters emphasized accountability and the symbolic importance of elected decision-making.","The Green Bay Area Public School District board approved a resolution appointing an independent hearing officer to process expulsions; several board members spoke against outsourcing for philosophical and oversight reasons and two board members recorded no votes.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6152880,"Green Bay school board directs staff to prepare RFP for superintendent search",1707,629000,2336000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5496334-1f495bc84574b6cf0449bb5bff725f3f&start=629&end=2336","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5496334-1f495bc84574b6cf0449bb5bff725f3f/thumbnail_629000.jpg","/articles/6152880/Wisconsin/Green-Bay-school-board-directs-staff-to-prepare-RFP-for-superintendent-search","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6152880-65ad65b85a6890f17b180e5f4721a417/orig.mp4?Expires=1775462384&Signature=PFJkRvVmErUql81gQOGiNngCRfJuwnWLz9j8Z~zD3dmN5EGZi41oddUVmi5ylb2U7Eg5o-o78NftN6TSgVBds3UiMZDSxoxb1LxneKlALvfpMUQ11PYQOCGXCb~nImIy~f7RMJYWSg8yNxlDLxFhbAS6d8JcaE1AjSQ3DRbTzm~H3NAxUAB4-42fjymeNJg5slFqDcAauOdzP~XiwnOs~C9X4snaLGZZJPEBz3fLCsT6s5o6ZmMyNJnMAEoASTDxSGNgYbAlbHgK9Yz3BqQIxq6Gv~4bc7Nuxlng-3RrpIaSDjuNpw6nTHVLYvcAwlzK6seyGVFe3ZjXkfFSbTNBxA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Green Bay Area Public School District Board of Education discussed options for its upcoming superintendent search and directed district staff to prepare a request for proposals to solicit outside vendors to manage the search process.

Board members debated four options presented by staff: conduct the search internally; accept a no-cost redo from BWP and Associates (costs limited to travel and expenses); hire the Wisconsin Association of School Boards (WASB) under its service model; or issue an RFP to seek other vendors. After discussion and questions about cost, timeline and engagement model, a majority of board members raised hands in favor of issuing an RFP and staff said they would draft and circulate a request for proposals.

Why it matters: The board is preparing for a labor-intensive superintendent search while also facing other major district tasks. Board members said they wanted transparency about engagement models, access to application materials, and cost estimates before committing to a vendor.

Board members and staff noted differences among the options. Staff described BWP and Associates as offering a no-cost redo of the prior search, with the district responsible for travel and expenses (staff estimated travel might be roughly $5,000 but said that was an estimate, not a firm quote). WASB’s estimate to provide superintendent-search services came to about $21,000–$26,000 in staff’s initial conversation; WASB’s model gives districts immediate access to application materials after the window closes and expects district leaders to take a hands-on role in screening and interviewing candidates. The board also discussed the practical time and labor costs of managing a search internally, including spikes of heavy staff work when the application window closes.

Several board members said they favored a short RFP process to ensure due diligence and to clarify whether any other firms with different models or local ties might be available. One board member recalled a prior RFP that began in July and concluded with selection in September, and staff said a similar calendar could be used so an RFP would not necessarily delay the broader search timeline. Other board members said they preferred a known partner with local connections and expressed concern about repeating past unsatisfactory experiences with outside firms.

The board did not take a formal roll-call vote on the choice; rather, the chair asked those in favor of issuing an RFP to indicate by raising hands. The chair said staff will draft the RFP, circulate it for board review and return with responses and a recommended scope for vendor selection.

Next steps and clarifications: Staff will draft and publish an RFP using district resources; staff told the board that preparing and publishing the RFP itself would not require an external consultant fee. Board members asked that the RFP clearly specify the engagement model the district seeks (for example, the level of board access to applications, interview design, and reference-checking responsibilities) so respondents can provide comparable proposals.

Context: The board discussed prior search costs and models: staff provided past total search costs (2020: $33,880; 2022: $38,960) and board members recalled a prior search that exceeded $40,000. Board members emphasized the tradeoffs among cost, transparency and operational support when selecting a vendor.","After discussing four vendor options and past search costs, the Green Bay Area Public School District board directed staff to prepare a request for proposals to solicit superintendent search firms and return to the board with recommendations.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Board hears legislative update on state proposals affecting school aid and mental-health funding

Board approves revised Southwest High School logo to improve consistency and trademark protections

Board approves use of independent hearing officer for expulsions after split debate

Green Bay school board directs staff to prepare RFP for superintendent search