In a significant court session on July 28, 2025, Judge Stephanie Boyd presided over a case involving Ronald Allen, who is accused of making a terroristic threat against the courthouse. The proceedings highlighted the serious implications of threats made within the judicial system, particularly as they relate to ongoing custody hearings.

During the afternoon docket, a police officer testified about a recorded statement made by Allen, which raised alarms due to its threatening nature. The officer recounted that Allen expressed a belief that he was in conflict with the court and mentioned a specific date—April 23, 2025—when he allegedly stated there would be "bodies everywhere" if the court proceedings did not go in his favor. This statement was deemed significant as it was linked to an upcoming custody hearing.

The officer confirmed that a warrant for Allen's arrest was generated based on this threat, which was presented as evidence in court. The prosecution argued that the elements of a terroristic threat were met, even without specific details on how the threat would be carried out. The defense, however, questioned the validity of the threat, pointing out that Allen had not disrupted any court proceedings in the past and that there was no direct evidence of his capability to execute such a threat.

As the session concluded, Judge Boyd scheduled a follow-up hearing for the next day to address motions to dismiss and suppress evidence related to the case. This ongoing legal battle underscores the critical intersection of mental health, custody disputes, and public safety within the community, raising concerns about the implications of threats made in the context of family law. The outcome of this case could have lasting effects on how similar threats are handled in the future, emphasizing the need for vigilance in maintaining safety within the judicial system.