[{"_1":2,"_95":-5,"_96":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74,84],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":44,"_46":47,"_48":49,"_50":51,"_52":53,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":59,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":65,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},"mediaId",6148319,"mediaKeyId","5516728-5417a8197590dbcbca5f82be304e9b1b","parentId",5516728,"title","Commissioners meet in executive sessions for legal advice on TABOR and for personnel severance policy discussion","audioSeconds",0,"startMs",11800000,"endMs","viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5516728-5417a8197590dbcbca5f82be304e9b1b&start=11800&end=11800","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5516728-5417a8197590dbcbca5f82be304e9b1b/thumbnail_11800000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6148319/Clear-Creek-County/Colorado/Commissioners-meet-in-executive-sessions-for-legal-advice-on-TABOR-and-for-personnel-severance-policy-discussion","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6148319-152f730189ff10afa2f456512faecb9d/orig.mp4?Expires=1775217441&Signature=A~7fMZdUDhhaPr9unFjFV5Z23rwNLPdqlU58jaQ6HIE7KMhDscbZ1TRvl2Pe6PLD7lzFJuvzVHdbFJZNHQoN4REve4~jowcqzbJ2wXzs1mLVQj-hfCgp-Dtmi2fzcVQ588WGQxq5I5bH~5Ppwlufj5QShVMKnYD6kcblYuoCP5aW~ksAQsTCIyiOByAvv0NgeC5CWq6ph3RCEeMP82QhVTlRzpfnrxWdiJPLb7AFwdMAkzwNA9I1d1-Nj~8pglDHvYwxh48pJeWEKVJgD15Vm~3lA6gtE3CiOSzvwmelZQdvOYeyDBLGVacDuL73LooAyiI7GWo-dUyqtBq71g92pg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Clear Creek County","date","2025-07-30T22:45:57Z","article","After concluding the Board of Equalization business the Board of County Commissioners moved into two separate executive sessions during the July 30 meeting. The first executive session was convened under CRS 24-6-402(4)(b) to allow the county attorney to provide legal advice on questions related to TABOR (Taxpayer's Bill of Rights), the application of TABOR to proposed ballot language, and the board's budget authority as it relates to sheriff operations and staffing. The second executive session was convened under CRS 24-6-402(4)(f) to discuss personnel matters connected to the county's severance policy.

No written minutes were kept for the executive sessions and commissioners recorded that no decisions were made while in executive session, consistent with statutory executive-session rules. The board returned to the public meeting and concluded the agenda after the sessions.

Ending
The board noted the sessions were for advice and personnel discussion only; any actions requiring public vote or formal resolution would be brought back to a public meeting and recorded in the minutes.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","July 30th, 2025 BOCC Meeting (BOE hearings continued)","oneSentenceSummary","After the equalization hearings the board entered two executive sessions: one for legal advice on TABOR and the board's budget authority related to sheriff staffing, and a second on personnel matters concerning the county severance policy.","taxTitle","Clear Creek County, Colorado","taxId",27207,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":42,"_43":77,"_45":77,"_46":78,"_48":79,"_50":80,"_52":81,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":82,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":83,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},6148322,"Commissioners approve Clear Creek Schools Foundation to administer lodging-tax-funded childcare scholarships",16560000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5516728-5417a8197590dbcbca5f82be304e9b1b&start=16560&end=16560","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5516728-5417a8197590dbcbca5f82be304e9b1b/thumbnail_16560000.jpg","/articles/6148322/Clear-Creek-County/Colorado/Commissioners-approve-Clear-Creek-Schools-Foundation-to-administer-lodging-tax-funded-childcare-scholarships","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6148322-bbf4f859bcf0fc4a43a79ff2a29237cb/orig.mp4?Expires=1775217441&Signature=n9XZ4e925ZR3QbyG4j8Ic3Pn8wVwPtHoZiL9Z1w7-KO08Kthm4zVUZAATuxCGdwwn5i34QgRmxEGXbCgHoIG7iKmniHJuPIHkB7sQZM~0NPzmHzq9ALvgxs1fcdzjzU5-y4gXRhu3-8xlz8FqZIr4SmqsN8Fq-rRBzOS3IeTeQ5GzeX0vbfOnZuvT2wPdq1D3HLZpt50waaOE4XNfJHHniKnI-mMbatMpoR5BviZoG3CA9KsWwAuPSf24I~50cYMWzO0vxaXqzrPj7RlMhrwslgco1eFO6bEq-dYjb~H5EI-iH7AlP8u46t9Z-jidA0H4KWKbOdN4skzqhJa3-psow__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Clear Creek County Board of County Commissioners approved an agreement July 30 with the Clear Creek Schools Foundation to administer scholarships for childcare using lodging-tax proceeds the county intends to set aside for that purpose. The board approved the five-year agreement by motion after County Attorney Peter Lickmeyer outlined how the foundation was selected through a request-for-proposals process.

Why it matters
The agreement designates the schools foundation as the administrator for lodging-tax-funded childcare scholarships and requires the foundation to work with a local partner to form a scholarship committee and a provider-vetting committee. County staff will have a representative on both committees and must approve the selection criteria and recipients. The agreement also requires reporting to the county each February and September and makes clear that funds must be appropriated by the county each fiscal year.

What the agreement requires
- The Schools Foundation will administer scholarship funds to childcare providers on behalf of selected families; the foundation will vet providers with county input.
- County human services will have committee representation and final sign-off on selection criteria.
- The agreement term is five years but requires annual appropriation to be effective; lack of appropriation voids payment obligations for that year.
- The foundation must provide periodic reports (February and September) and a post-program report to show how funds were distributed and used.

Board action
A motion to approve the agreement passed unanimously. Commissioners said the arrangement preserves county oversight while relying on a local nonprofit with demonstrated experience. County staff will work with the foundation on yearly fund transfers and on any future amendments should the board decide to shift lodging-tax funds to other childcare-related uses (for example, workforce development or capital support for facilities).

Ending
The board asked staff to follow up on execution logistics: foundation signature and notarization, then county signatures and formal transfer letters once the county appropriates funds for the coming year.","The board approved a five-year agreement with the Clear Creek Schools Foundation to administer lodging-tax-funded childcare scholarships and to work with a local partner to vet providers; county staff will sit on selection and provider-vetting committees.",{"_33":85,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":86,"_41":87,"_43":42,"_45":88,"_46":89,"_48":90,"_50":91,"_52":92,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":93,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":94,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},6148327,"Clear Creek County commissioners deny most property tax appeals after daylong Board of Equalization hearings",17010,17010000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5516728-5417a8197590dbcbca5f82be304e9b1b&start=0&end=17010","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5516728-5417a8197590dbcbca5f82be304e9b1b/thumbnail_0.jpg","/articles/6148327/Clear-Creek-County/Colorado/Clear-Creek-County-commissioners-deny-most-property-tax-appeals-after-daylong-Board-of-Equalization-hearings","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6148327-43efcbaacadc617aef0d1538ac37372e/orig.mp4?Expires=1775217441&Signature=PMzqkw16WDFhiOpVUO-kaJUUvw~RQ5~8tLICLCoQVLIYIF5GWmLQ4Na3VQzQpH~nCNkjU4bsEn4GDxbXJqRT5pU-4MdR-F0rb6kS90lfZGziNZIn7Rcelbt7-gGI17JzVyEGbQ~BZEKeZZa54Um2a3ZUU9gdUJ8FHukaZ-2oaHHTaZCJI2WfTLyfGQ7WQK2XPoTVAd2JrsXXavsJhWVAxBLWtksuXWA3F0hLJQT~nm1uOJF4hsE~~KYpChkWOwln4O-lokwqt8kjgOfjPU3pbzBiVZV8DC0wFAoX6WvbxuBSWmYCfSr2HOVxmlsa4N8MEEcLJ5mChcx7CP729B-83Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Clear Creek County\u0000Board of County Commissioners met July 30 in a special session to hear property tax protests while sitting as the Board of Equalization. The board heard dozens of individual appeals, reviewed assessor comparables and evidence, and ruled on each case by motion and vote. Most appeals were denied and the assessor's values were sustained; three protests were withdrawn and one parcel was reclassified as natural resources.

The Board prioritized in-person protesters, limited public-comment slots to three minutes and ran the appeal process in a standardized order: assessor presentation of comparables, a three-minute petitioner statement, and commissioner questions before a motion and vote. The board repeatedly noted that the assessor is required by state statute to use a specified sales time window when setting values and that annual appropriation is required for any future funding tied to decisions.

Votes at a glance
- Case 25-54 (Kaplan): Board accepted assessor recommendation to reduce the valuation from $701,007.30 to $639,003.70 and approved the adjusted value. Motion passed.
- Case 25-48 (873 Soda Creek Road): Motion to deny the petitioner's request and accept the assessor's value passed; appeal denied.
- Cases 25-42 and 25-53 (204 Argentine Street): Motion to assess the property at the assessor's value and deny the appeals passed; appeals denied for both account numbers.
- Case 25-43 (41 Juneau Trail): Motion to deny the protest and accept the assessor's value passed; appeal denied.
- Case 25-46 (commercial property, Shiprock Holdings): Board accepted the assessor's assessment (sale-based regression adjustment applied); motion passed.
- Case 25-49 (90 Crow Ridge Road): Board accepted the assessor's adjusted value after review; motion passed.
- Case 25-50 (Bastian): Board accepted the assessor's valuation and denied the protest; motion passed.
- Case 25-51 / 2551 (Mead): Board accepted the assessor's adjusted value and denied the protest; motion passed.
- Case 25-40 (Agnew/Robert Agnick; 586 Highview Drive): Board accepted the assessor's assessment; motion passed.
- Case 25-22 (Sisson): Board accepted the assessor's adjusted valuation after discussion of square-footage and comparable issues; motion passed.
- Bear Creek / Fair Creek Development cluster (multiple contiguous parcels): Several protests were heard together. Three accounts (case numbers 2555, 2556 and 2560) were withdrawn by the petitioner. For the remaining disputed parcels the board: denied the protests on 25-57, 25-58 and 25-59 (assessor values sustained); amended case 25-61 to reclassify the parcel as \"natural resources\" with an assessed value of $480 (motion passed); and denied the protest and accepted the assessor's valuations for case 25-62.
- Case 25-44 (Weber / 428 Upper Elk Creek Drive): Board accepted the assessor's assessment; motion passed.
- Case 25-47 (Jane Gray / 1103 Aspen Drive): Board accepted the assessor's adjusted value; motion passed.
- Case 25-39 (Elk Valley / 2650 Winter Gulch and similar): Board accepted the assessor's adjusted values; motion passed.

How decisions were reached
Commissioners repeatedly told petitioners the board can consider factual errors in recorded characteristics (bedrooms, bathrooms, square footage, condition) and comparable sales submitted within the statutorily required period, but not matters outside that window. The assessor noted that mass-appraisal regression analysis sets the county's statistical baselines (for example, adjustments for road maintenance or topography) and that individual appraisals may be considered but are subject to statutory limits on the sales period for tax assessment. Several petitioners provided photographs, third-party appraisals or sale-comparison material; in multiple cases the board found the assessor's chosen comparables and adjustments more persuasive.

Ending
Most appeals were resolved in favor of the assessor after the board reviewed comparable sales and property characteristics. The board recorded votes and motions for each item and instructed staff to mail formal decisions. A handful of petitioners were advised on how to provide clearer evidence (photos, proof of condition issues, permits or records) if they choose to file future appeals.","At a July 30 special meeting the Board of County Commissioners sat as the Board of Equalization, heard roughly 25 property tax protests and voted to uphold the assessor’s values in the majority of cases; three appeals were withdrawn and one parcel was reclassified as natural resources.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commissioners meet in executive sessions for legal advice on TABOR and for personnel severance policy discussion

Commissioners approve Clear Creek Schools Foundation to administer lodging-tax-funded childcare scholarships

Clear Creek County commissioners deny most property tax appeals after daylong Board of Equalization hearings