[{"_1":2,"_124":-5,"_125":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100,112],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6147128,"mediaKeyId","5522109-ff756dfd54e625d49a25ffc881fd887b","parentId",5522109,"title","Village panels approve Phase 1 of Marchstone preliminary plat with conditions; residents press for water and traffic studies","audioSeconds",3106,"startMs",141000,"endMs",3247000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5522109-ff756dfd54e625d49a25ffc881fd887b&start=141&end=3247","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5522109-ff756dfd54e625d49a25ffc881fd887b/thumbnail_141000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6147128/Wisconsin/Village-panels-approve-Phase-1-of-Marchstone-preliminary-plat-with-conditions-residents-press-for-water-and-traffic-studies","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6147128-938aa486d6963b1f7fb3bd2eb2c760fb/orig.mp4?Expires=1776324227&Signature=kFT2SKF62Uv4YmDWOcjPSaUqNyb2hY7CU5uAghkPnkgpYuySX1jWIXLWL5FQOrAZ3LxO0vRaNYQyJZmRDSFCKI7UajoI5~SKarSGkMaFB6JNY8R~Cq5oa0Pc91ETCYq-vBP0iz7qHlaK7cjz7cJ5LvC42kRlsl4telWjAUnPhOvSs4ToN-vhdPiIqGbhmCdYYDVvlwkLJvBUDSuZrT3b4CmvGLec2O7hnjNar9fMebxw2PFl7yzuYJgK7cSLLPWFnUcozLxHLkdEaD8kixTvqRNqA~vqaQaapCBcNnvH9OSaN5CqOEUiLmnG3eRn3OP9PQPB8hQ9jkSOry2MJR1XKA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Village of Cross Plains, WI","date","2025-08-01T11:57:45.46Z","article","The Cross Plains Planning Commission and Village Board approved the preliminary plat for the Marchstone development on July 28, 2025, voting to move Phase 1 forward while attaching staff‑recommended conditions and several waivers.

The decision advances a proposed residential subdivision and associated amenities, including a golf course, after extended public comment that focused on traffic at the Church Street/North Military Road intersection, stormwater and groundwater impacts to springs and Black Earth Creek, pesticide use on golf courses, and the adequacy of prior traffic counts.

Why it matters: the Marchstone site lies near headwaters that feed Black Earth Creek, a trout stream valued for recreation and ecological services. Commenters and watershed groups urged a cumulative impact study and 100% infiltration of stormwater for the development’s runoff to protect springs and stream flow; developers and village staff said required regulatory review will involve the village, Dane County, and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.

Developers and village staff
Jeff Hain, representing the landowners and development team, emphasized local ties and said the project has been reviewed for months by village staff and that DNR and county oversight will apply as the proposal progresses. Adam Watkins of Weiser Engineering and project counsel Robert Proctor were present to answer technical and legal questions.

Resident concerns and technical requests
Public commenters raised multiple issues: written comments from nearby property owners asked how the village will choose among roundabout or signal options at Church Street and Military Road and whether property acquisition, utility relocation, drainage, speed limits and costs would be required. Residents questioned the use of a 2016 traffic study and urged an updated traffic count that includes daytime agricultural and semi‑truck movements and school bus turning radii.

Environmental groups and scientists urged careful water‑resources review. Henry Nels Lowe of the Southern Wisconsin chapter of Trout Unlimited said the site includes wooded hillsides and a recharge area that feeds a spring supplying Black Earth Creek; he asked for engagement of groundwater experts before approving additional phases. Michelle Harris, a board member of the Black Earth Creek Watershed Association, asked the village to require Marchstone to achieve “100% of rainwater and snowmelt infiltration” for the development and to study cumulative impacts of the golf course and development on spring flow and water quality. Developers said they are targeting very high infiltration rates and pointed to prior DNR review of comparable projects.

Traffic and access
Multiple residents from Oak Valley Estates and the nearby neighborhoods said the planned development will increase local traffic load and urged a third access route or direct access to Highway 14 so neighborhood streets do not absorb construction and long‑term traffic. Commenters pressed the village and developer to re‑examine connections to Bur Oak/Stagecoach and Evergreen Parkway (also referred to as Military Road in comments) and questioned whether a roundabout would worsen pedestrian safety compared with traffic signals.

Approvals and conditions
The planning commission approved the preliminary plat contingent on staff recommendations and granted requested waivers, including lot‑size waivers and permission for a payment of fees in lieu of on‑site parkland dedication, to be formalized in an agreement. Village board trustees later affirmed the planning commission’s recommendation. As part of the record, staff noted the applicant’s infiltration calculations and stated additional regulatory review will be required for later phases: any expansion of the urban service area, and County or DNR permits for stormwater and wetland-related work.

What was not decided
The board’s action approved only the Phase 1 preliminary plat and associated waivers and did not approve later phases, the golf course itself, or any change to the municipal urban service area. The transcript and staff comments make clear that Phase 2 — and any road connections, traffic treatments at Church Street and Military Road, or changes to infiltration commitments — would require additional approvals, separate engineering submittals, and external agency review.

Requests for further study and next steps
Several commenters asked the village to require independent groundwater and cumulative‑impact studies, and to update traffic counts during busier agricultural periods. The Black Earth Creek Watershed Association asked the village to work with the developer to achieve best‑practice stormwater, fertilizer/pesticide management, and long‑term monitoring before approving additional phases; watershed representatives said they provided a July 24 letter with cost and study suggestions. Staff and trustees indicated those concerns will be considered as staff conditions and as part of any future review; the village will also rely on county and DNR oversight where applicable.

Local context and follow‑up
Trustees and planning commissioners emphasized that Phase 1 approval does not guarantee later approvals and urged continued engagement among the developer, village staff, technical experts, and community stakeholders. The developer told the boards they have worked with village staff repeatedly over about a year and will continue to respond to regulatory and village requirements. Residents and environmental groups said they will request additional study and independent input before later approvals.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","07.28.2025 Village Board Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","The Cross Plains Planning Commission and Village Board approved the preliminary plat for the Marchstone development on July 28, 2025, voting to move Phase 1 forward while attaching staff‑recommended conditions and several waivers.","taxTitle","Village of Cross Plains, Dane County, Wisconsin","taxId",74013,"location","Wisconsin","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6147107,"Village approves emergency rebuild of sewer jetter truck pump; additional maintenance also authorized",275,10765000,11040000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5522109-ff756dfd54e625d49a25ffc881fd887b&start=10765&end=11040","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5522109-ff756dfd54e625d49a25ffc881fd887b/thumbnail_10765000.jpg","/articles/6147107/Wisconsin/Village-approves-emergency-rebuild-of-sewer-jetter-truck-pump-additional-maintenance-also-authorized","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6147107-f08bafae9f19fa1b147dd49662328863/orig.mp4?Expires=1776324227&Signature=oZVF5VMLWpUVonr00ycaVSbBbKHXW4rwTVBNgfNBPMR7mTXejCxYdCC~M4wwyzI6fu7F3YSUukebuDuSCYEMwxY6x6Z-RwOM0JcrPgJlm4lYgHsVVigzJ9lGHcWiy2zS6Xher2qmwtHcBCnNetxz3~tjxig7RY1uvPIwKQF01iiUxW7Uei52Nm1Cadkm8Ingk1CWTSg-VONtPG-5MheAc4k7~Al52xOuZkqNKCnKwaQOMw9yb-6yKEl8icmU2U7Hgc2ELfdSXYTEsjuSMWcFb8yiZcXjpv4XslbnRneNGbH5bY-CtvEg3y1ejWUP~56g9epge25RHXAXkcIAUrfDIA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Village public works staff told trustees on July 28 that the municipal sewer jetter truck — used to clear sewer mains — experienced a high‑pressure pump failure. The truck was taken to a specialist shop for diagnosis.

The shop reported the routed/hydraulic pump needs a rebuild at an estimated cost of $18,332.50. Because the vehicle was already at the vendor and some components are aged, staff also recommended a further maintenance package that would include new steering tires, hoses and routine items while the truck is out of service. The broader package brought the projected work total to approximately $21,000, though staff noted some line items could be removed to lower cost.

Board action and rationale
Trustees approved the emergency pump rebuild and the recommended maintenance while the vehicle is at the vendor to reduce future downtime. Staff said a full replacement truck would cost in the high hundreds of thousands of dollars and that maintaining the current vehicle is more cost‑effective. The work will be charged to the sewer utility operating fund.

Operational impact
Public Works noted that if the jetter truck were out of service for an extended period, the village’s ability to respond to sanitary sewer blockages would be reduced; rapid repair preserves operational capacity. The vendor is expected to complete the rebuild and return the truck to service in short order.

Follow up
Staff will proceed with the vendor work, return invoices and report completion of the repair to trustees.","Public Works reported failure of the high‑pressure pump on the sewer jetter truck; trustees authorized an $18,332.50 rebuild and approved a broader maintenance package while vehicle is at the service vendor. Funding will come from the sewer utility.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6147113,"Village awards 2025 street maintenance contracts and approves sidewalk replacement plan; board discusses funding options",470,6415000,6885000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5522109-ff756dfd54e625d49a25ffc881fd887b&start=6415&end=6885","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5522109-ff756dfd54e625d49a25ffc881fd887b/thumbnail_6415000.jpg","/articles/6147113/Wisconsin/Village-awards-2025-street-maintenance-contracts-and-approves-sidewalk-replacement-plan-board-discusses-funding-options","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6147113-70e51c9930baa6c2e5754823fcac0ff0/orig.mp4?Expires=1776324227&Signature=IWPXhEMBuuBi8F9HwmDU04KU5P0CgfoJ9nR-S1jvQiULHgnPrXz2Q2YEJ-GBBvlPB88TNIWrsw9A5OMAtsOotLqkmvBTlfTIUoa7btYPlT4edXVMUD2JeZNvLK0C8AhXRQaC~c0Su3ViS5sB6vSGKe3SEzNNFa5fAoHZYWq2UZylJCMdHrKiorvoRSfSRU5EZ02hfhq1ezsFJ6F67L~F7p8Pp7FPlXCI2J8b-1cZVEU6Xcb1Yikpahh957In6KWFDQiKPIYY1oFUdgrr465KSfIsDzihVMNsQRGHX~Gm3-rJl-YxFtn-2lL-HmdPFscTpkdGcituYzKtQoDxO6IoeA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Village Board on July 28 awarded the 2025 street maintenance project base bid and selected alternates to Payne & Dolan and approved a sidewalk replacement contract following a single responsive bid.

Street maintenance
Public Works staff reported a bid opening on July 24. The low and responsive bidder for the base package — resurfacing and spot repairs on several streets — was Payne & Dolan with a base bid of $217,503, close to the pre‑bid estimate. The board approved the base bid and directed staff to include alternates where feasible. Alternate 1 (Saint Francis Street work) and Alternates 2 and 3 (miscellaneous patches and the treatment plant driveway) were discussed; staff also secured a supplemental unit‑price item for future repairs in 2026–2027 at set unit rates so the village can call on the vendor for patch work without requiring a separate full competitive bid.

Sidewalk replacement
Staff received one timely bid for identified sidewalk segments and recommended awarding the 2025 sidewalk replacement contract to Town & Country (bid of $32,000). The board approved that award and directed staff to notify affected property owners consistent with the village sidewalk policy; homeowners typically pay 50% of replacement costs where policy requires shared cost.

Funding and budget discussion
Board members discussed options for paying the incremental cost of the selected alternates and the supplemental pricing. Staff explained the village can use fund balance or borrow for capital maintenance; trustees expressed a preference to borrow for pavement maintenance if needed, to preserve general fund balance for other priorities and to avoid compressing next year’s capital plan. Trustees asked staff to bring final financing options and the bid tabulation to the next meeting.

What was decided
The board awarded the 2025 street maintenance contract to Payne & Dolan (base and selected alternates and supplemental unit pricing) and awarded the sidewalk replacement contract based on the single responsive bidder; staff will coordinate contract finalization and homeowner notifications under the sidewalk policy.","Trustees awarded base and alternates for 2025 street maintenance to Payne & Dolan and approved a sidewalk replacement contract after receiving single bid. Board discussed budget, borrowing and use of fund balance and directed staff to proceed.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6147118,"Cross Plains board authorizes bid documents for new village hall and police station; bid review slated for August",119,5911000,6030000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5522109-ff756dfd54e625d49a25ffc881fd887b&start=5911&end=6030","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5522109-ff756dfd54e625d49a25ffc881fd887b/thumbnail_5911000.jpg","/articles/6147118/Wisconsin/Cross-Plains-board-authorizes-bid-documents-for-new-village-hall-and-police-station-bid-review-slated-for-August","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6147118-1da9e3b905f2aa534804015ebdda53d3/orig.mp4?Expires=1776324227&Signature=A5hyjc3beV8GAwL1b4EMowZb4fjB~Hr4N3Oy1UsF3bBH6CR1ZeCHj-558AgwQ5XBWF03UG8COfvPSuhugCqHHVsbxmMhJncfCnJb7w2Z9d5ANPlb1TfCI15~VEjwU2bPznnIzPXPdGq2a3ASMKax6VgmDqS4ouJLg-L5wEeABJZPeaWUnqAgr2jdMB6Fm2XTpoTYbx3-LnG-fy6qwNPi2WRsdt7XvuTh-5asp-KcLqLHCiZsrMrubfYzxqu1tsLnJBTM9vTzaA6tvzb1Uvk76tA3B~dOisQsv~LL2s-R49DeRQi0RYy20VZIUdql6jW44DE08Hi7s6P0A7sifpVP-Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Village Board on July 28 authorized staff to issue bid documents for a combined new Village Hall and Police Department building after the architect completed a detailed review of construction documents.

Village Administrator and staff said the design team completed a line‑by‑line review of the hundreds of pages of construction documents and that several clarifications remained to be incorporated. The board directed staff to proceed with solicitation of bids once those items were incorporated.

Timeline and process
Staff outlined an expected schedule: bids will be solicited after the remaining clarifications are made, a bid review is planned for late August, and the board expects to receive a recommended bidder at the September village board meeting. Trustees said they will evaluate bid results against budget constraints and are open to discussing alternatives if bids exceed available funding.

What was authorized
The authorization covers the issuance of formal construction bid documents; it does not bind the village to accept any bid, nor does it approve a construction contract or final financing. Trustees asked staff to provide final cost estimates and identify alternatives before committing to an award.

Why it matters
The combined building will house village administration and the police department. The village has worked with an architect and reviewed the documents with external design reviewers and an internal neighbor with municipal plan experience, and staff said the documents will be publicly available for review at Village Hall.

Next steps
Village staff will confirm final clarifications with the architect, issue bid documents, and return to the board with bid results and a recommendation in September.","Trustees authorized staff to issue bid documents for a combined Village Hall and Police Department building after finishing construction documents. The village expects a late‑August bid review and a recommended award at the September board meeting.",{"_33":113,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":114,"_41":115,"_43":116,"_45":117,"_47":118,"_49":119,"_51":120,"_53":121,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":122,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":123,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6147121,"Cross Plains residents, volunteers oppose village takeover of Cross Plains EMS; board schedules wider review",3772,2347000,6119000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5522109-ff756dfd54e625d49a25ffc881fd887b&start=2347&end=6119","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5522109-ff756dfd54e625d49a25ffc881fd887b/thumbnail_2347000.jpg","/articles/6147121/Wisconsin/Cross-Plains-residents-volunteers-oppose-village-takeover-of-Cross-Plains-EMS-board-schedules-wider-review","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6147121-a587156c12add369417334f848c21b2e/orig.mp4?Expires=1776324227&Signature=Igq1LcX~oxnLYQbPRJ0SnYq9A02MPF2pYI9CETFA3PhAPAAjTlO5eSgV9bbtxSFOo~pnccFnU4JZX4PjbQTSUkZ0PjMdP2xu1AjkmE8T~-EdXCOMhqhcT1nh53tYM8CL~pRhscJ38S4HzV-JmLwbXtpG22pvo897Oo3~7zS9ik27RL2QB79YE85oQrJbDr1gBkKSHA2unNLkPmUm6DbSUPpdbotzA37WRLR80v2-orlU0oJLQnRpoKSi5dVAfj162T9S9HEw2WZEpJbhevwfy9~EOlKCISo-Iml4RKxzCU-P62ZCGgRHeyxYauPHxlMCry4ngCpqy9u6Ts-IXIP~yA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Hundreds of residents, volunteers and medical professionals urged the Cross Plains Village Board on July 28 to reject a proposal for the village to take over Cross Plains Area EMS, saying the change would harm local emergency coverage and the volunteer culture that sustains it.

The board did not vote to assume control of EMS. Instead, trustees and the village president described an ongoing process: the village finance committee prepared a review and expects to present options publicly before the board considers any formal governance change.

Why it matters: Cross Plains Area EMS serves the village and several surrounding townships. Commenters said the service combines volunteers, part‑time and full‑time staff and provides local training opportunities for students and medical trainees; opponents warned that a municipal takeover could dissolve the volunteer association, decrease local training opportunities and increase costs for the village and outlying towns.

Public comment: volunteers, clinicians and residents
At least three dozen speakers addressed the board in person or remotely. They included current EMS volunteers, full‑time EMS staff and community members who described personal experiences: quick volunteer responses in emergencies, training pathways for students and the role of the nonprofit EMS Association in purchasing critical equipment.

Katrina McKee, an ER nurse and volunteer EMT, said the takeover “undermines everything our community stands for” and argued the village’s finance representative had bypassed established grievance procedures and district agreements. Charles Pierce, the medical director for Cross Plains EMS, wrote in a letter read to the board that “CPEMS operates in a cost effective manner” and urged the village to support, not replace, the current model.

Chief and deputy chief responses
Chief Holly Ellickson, who has led the department for the past 18 months and been a member for 27 years, told trustees the recent budget increase cited by finance predated her tenure and was intended to bring wages closer to comparable agencies. She cited safeguards implemented after a prior embezzlement case and said internal audits and new checks and balances have been applied. Deputy Chief Brian Pitt said the department now has nearly 50 members and argued that replacing the current governance model risks losing staff and volunteer capacity.

Key numbers and governance issues
Speakers and documents cited several concrete points that informed the debate: the village’s share of the district budget reported in materials is about 58.4% (participants noted this sensitivity when discussing voting and representation on the district board). Commenters said the Cross Plains EMS Association, a 501(c)(3), contributed roughly $60,000 toward a new ambulance and has funded equipment purchases such as a mechanical CPR device and pediatric restraint systems. The record also contains mention of prior internal theft of roughly $36,000–$40,000 that prompted new controls; panelists said those issues have been audited and partly recovered through insurance.

Board response and next steps
Village leaders said the finance committee’s preliminary report compiles fiscal and governance information but does not mandate a takeover. Trustees directed staff and finance to organize stakeholder briefings and public community meetings so residents and the EMS district municipalities can review the committee’s findings and alternatives. The village president said finance will present a revised report at its August 4 meeting and that public safety and village board presentations will follow, with a community meeting planned for September. The board asked that an explicit “stay the same” option be included in the presentation materials.

What was not decided
No formal withdrawal from the EMS district or municipal takeover was approved. Several townships and district members indicated they had not agreed to let the village operate service in their jurisdictions; trustees and commenters warned that unilateral changes could reduce district revenue and require the village to assume higher costs.

Implications
Speakers said a municipal takeover could hasten staff departures, reduce student training opportunities, and increase response times or costs for residents outside the village if district towns do not contract with the village-run service. Trustees committed to host expanded briefings and to include the option to retain the current structure in the packet for community review before any formal vote.","Hundreds of residents and EMS personnel urged the Village Board not to take over Cross Plains Area EMS. Speakers warned of volunteer loss, reduced training opportunities and longer response times. Finance committee said it prepared a report and the board committed to an expanded stakeholder presentation and public meetings in August/September.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Village panels approve Phase 1 of Marchstone preliminary plat with conditions; residents press for water and traffic studies

Village approves emergency rebuild of sewer jetter truck pump; additional maintenance also authorized

Village awards 2025 street maintenance contracts and approves sidewalk replacement plan; board discusses funding options

Cross Plains board authorizes bid documents for new village hall and police station; bid review slated for August

Cross Plains residents, volunteers oppose village takeover of Cross Plains EMS; board schedules wider review