Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Tri State Proposes Cost Effective Resource Plan With New Gas Facility and Storage Expansion

August 01, 2025 | Public Utilities Commission, Governor's Boards and Commissions, Organizations, Executive, Colorado


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Tri State Proposes Cost Effective Resource Plan With New Gas Facility and Storage Expansion
In a recent government meeting held in Colorado, Tri-State Generation and Transmission presented its preferred resource plan for the upcoming years, emphasizing its commitment to cost-effectiveness and environmental compliance. The plan, which spans from 2026 to 2031, aims to meet Colorado's greenhouse gas emission reduction targets while ensuring reliable energy for its cooperative members.

Tri-State's report outlines six model portfolios, with the preferred plan identified as the least costly option for cooperative members. This plan includes a mix of renewable energy sources: 400 megawatts of wind, 200 megawatts of solar, and 650 megawatts of battery storage. Notably, the preferred portfolio also proposes replacing a gas turbine project with additional storage capacity, reflecting a shift towards more sustainable energy solutions.

The meeting highlighted the importance of transitioning away from coal, with two coal units scheduled for retirement in 2028 and 2031. Tri-State asserts that these retirements are crucial for meeting statutory emission reduction goals and maintaining eligibility for new funding opportunities. The company anticipates that its preferred portfolio will not only achieve the required emissions reductions but will also do so in a financially prudent manner, avoiding significant transmission capital expenditures.

However, the plan has faced scrutiny. Some commission staff expressed concerns about the lack of comparative analysis regarding the gas turbine replacements at Shaffer, which were not evaluated in the initial phase of the resource planning process. Additionally, while the preferred portfolio has garnered support from various stakeholders, including the Colorado Energy Office and local governments, there are dissenting voices regarding the inclusion of new gas resources.

Tri-State's independent evaluator confirmed that the resource planning process was conducted fairly, but the ongoing debate underscores the complexities of balancing economic, environmental, and community interests in energy planning. As the commission prepares to make a decision, the discussions from this meeting will play a critical role in shaping Colorado's energy landscape for the coming years.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Colorado articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI