[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6589563,"mediaKeyId","5550221-7c2a452613d9279ad794918b5b700b86","parentId",5550221,"title","Rome planning board recommends clarifications to short‑term rental ordinance before common council","audioSeconds",1127,"startMs",614000,"endMs",1741000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5550221-7c2a452613d9279ad794918b5b700b86&start=614&end=1741","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5550221-7c2a452613d9279ad794918b5b700b86/thumbnail_614000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6589563/Rome/Oneida-County/New-York/Rome-planning-board-recommends-clarifications-to-shortterm-rental-ordinance-before-common-council","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6589563-b451aff7a271c6574aa25982b893d37b/orig.mp4?Expires=1774949226&Signature=HCs2LcQXlZGxFvPPsn7MoZgWr34lZ0AXfTOfH96Z5P7gRFCgOyQoeiUGHtVlBl3H6RNfNFfT1InQs5VOea0z~QYm5uiEzE80aJpHh1t0nek5O9BmwNgF4WsDoYMAijTyAe7Kx8oIu8hepBWEzFJhft6yw6muol68Saeznq-sOfVWA6dsrjJPiKUoXsUWT98E1~st2uMvMKo0OTBySh4uEXnGwZNhQFHFx3dCq5WjjWUO0Zg0eYkwRh9AO00TwknJfJuwVy0nUIcr7C8LH85Vg~720Xn-SekB1sRDCfnfAUUOILu~HAUnpHX0oXjqPbbOssQ~Aj4rsIZ1ixLNC~mPrg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Rome, NY","date","2025-08-06T11:40:13Z","article","The City of Rome Planning Board voted unanimously to recommend that the Common Council adopt Ordinance No. 9807A—an amendment to Rome City Code Chapter 80 that would establish a permitting process for short‑term rentals—while asking the council to clarify several provisions before adoption.

A planning‑staff speaker told the board the draft ordinance generally “does a pretty good job” but recommended specific clarifications: that the permit fee be $150 annually and that the ordinance explicitly state whether the permit applies per address/parcel or per rental unit. The staff speaker said the board should also clarify how the ordinance treats multi‑unit buildings and accessory dwelling units.

The board and staff discussed parking at length. Staff and board members advised that short‑term‑rental permits should not be read to override existing zoning parking maximums. The planning‑staff speaker suggested the permit application require the host to advertise a fixed number of off‑street parking spaces so the advertised maximum matches what is enforceable, and to add a catchall sentence stating that nothing in the short‑term rental section shall override other provisions of the code.

On tenant and host responsibilities, staff recommended language making the host responsible for ensuring tenant compliance with all city rules and regulations, “including but not limited to” garbage and recycling, winter parking, public nuisance, and noise violations. The board discussed how to define a “unit” (staff noted building code typically counts kitchens as the unit divider) and asked the Common Council to consider a clear rule on whether permits are per kitchen/unit or per parcel.

Planning staff said the drafting team had been working on short‑term rental language for about a year and a half and aimed to be neither overly restrictive nor to encourage excessive conversions. The board ultimately moved to forward the ordinance to the Common Council with the planning board’s recommendations; the motion carried unanimously.

The board did not set an enforcement schedule or financial implementation timeline; staff said those details would follow during the council’s deliberations and the clerk/legal office review. The recommendation packet will be sent to the Common Council and to the city’s corporation counsel for further drafting and clarification.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","8/5/2025 Planning Board Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","The planning board voted unanimously to forward a recommendation to the common council on Ordinance No. 9807A (short‑term rentals), asking for clearer language on whether permits are per unit or per parcel, parking limits, a $150 annual fee, and host responsibility for tenant compliance with city code.","taxTitle","Rome, Oneida County, New York","taxId",54217,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6589569,"Rome planning board approves three‑lot subdivision at 310–312 South James Street",273,317000,590000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5550221-7c2a452613d9279ad794918b5b700b86&start=317&end=590","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5550221-7c2a452613d9279ad794918b5b700b86/thumbnail_317000.jpg","/articles/6589569/Rome/Oneida-County/New-York/Rome-planning-board-approves-threelot-subdivision-at-310312-South-James-Street","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6589569-8525f14e4843c8186751b0faf34ad6ad/orig.mp4?Expires=1774949226&Signature=I~TyLMWBr1vhztfYvBjk0ME3KVM~ghTizA2nZsxhdyyM8nYtNYRLJp1tTQd1fHW5Jv~zijc2obTUfqZft4i3wbxvteZtle1vcA7XfoWVlA82MBOK-q1r7gwwl4QxPXIKA25cf1ElH-TPX9ePkU0Q1wnGao8-znoFglwA7jNju7TIGZTCPzNi49tTEhVYtponK2lmTj0wu9XzjYR4jIpIXirjfjc1gkiAD6n~mpWEZ5WWFw71drs907JZxBVraWNqtl1NaVwkW-i9sX2OttwNPdp2mb~Dal1QLLEehiOtcqI9nX0CdDSirznkU-wLZjNF0xqDFRwpscIZnMScQTLsKQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The City of Rome Planning Board unanimously approved a three‑lot minor subdivision for property addressed as 310–312 South James Street after holding a public hearing at its August meeting.

The approval followed a staff recommendation to issue a negative declaration under the city’s environmental review process and a presentation by the applicant’s surveyor. The board heard no public comment during the hearing. Planning staff confirmed there are no mapped wetlands or floodplains on the site.

Jeff Moore of Moore Land Surveying represented the petitioner and described the site as about “almost 3 acres” just below the Access Federal Credit Union and bounded in part by an old railroad. Moore said the proposal would separate an existing pole barn (the former Agway building) onto Lot 1, with Lot 1 having road frontage on South James Street and Ridge Road. He said Lot 1 would be roughly 0.9 acre; Lot 2 about 0.6 acre and largely residual land behind the main building; and Lot 3 about 0.2 acre with frontage on Ridge Road.

Community and Economic Development staff recommended issuing a negative declaration and approving the subdivision as a minor plan; staff told the board the proposal conforms with the zoning code minimums and subdivision regulations. The board first voted to accept the negative declaration and then voted to approve the subdivision review. Both votes carried unanimously.

Because the application was submitted as a minor subdivision, the planning board’s approval becomes final without further subdivision review, the board noted. Board members told the applicant to work with city staff on final signatures and plan copies.

The board did not receive any written or spoken objections at the hearing, and no conditions beyond standard code compliance were attached to the approval. The board chair reminded the applicant that all work must comply with applicable city codes.

The petitioner and surveyor were advised to coordinate with Community and Economic Development staff for final plat filing and any ministerial steps required to record the new lot lines.","After a public hearing with no speakers, the City of Rome Planning Board issued a negative environmental declaration and approved a three‑lot minor subdivision at 310–312 South James Street; the approval becomes final because the plan is minor.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Rome planning board recommends clarifications to short‑term rental ordinance before common council

Rome planning board approves three‑lot subdivision at 310–312 South James Street