[{"_1":2,"_121":-5,"_122":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,110],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6490319,"mediaKeyId","5555417-5dc428b529ef9f74ca1359d4bdfd7a23","parentId",5555417,"title","Votes at a glance: selected items approved by Los Angeles City Council","audioSeconds",2267,"startMs",901000,"endMs",3168000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5555417-5dc428b529ef9f74ca1359d4bdfd7a23&start=901&end=3168","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5555417-5dc428b529ef9f74ca1359d4bdfd7a23/thumbnail_901000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6490319/Los-Angeles-City/Los-Angeles-County/California/Votes-at-a-glance-selected-items-approved-by-Los-Angeles-City-Council","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6490319-0f4052c564c3856289d3a742495e3771/orig.mp4?Expires=1773585908&Signature=IAsb8jdRR7-HpEMZ0jRevpB3JFxjjJrdtc8bPBsuAiwRYeYmn8G~RFc4CeWCPxwQTlpftQI~OOwIQWy-b~JrXCfjrEHO~8Ma9sZHmiWSHWA5d5cGV1oF5B4XJcUmtr~Kw7P6lPH~6VYHqX5OYjaWwQF3-R7TxnVEDIT-f~gk6kUZGEN0I6ZjAeg65FlMTfrFEHmpyHkZQvVDOLXmkd2ZEaty6bUHHKHF13-9yxyiMc5r8HQkjJGjZhoJOk23ckcqoiZmQlhhaS0G1gMVXLFUFVeNnAhu5Kzvvi-pFY35UZVLgm~I0-TY3YOnd5yUyq1Bx-OUHh6zTq3ExHvvqPHipg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Los Angeles City","date","2025-08-08T15:03:57Z","article","This is a concise summary of recorded votes and formal council actions found on the meeting transcript. It lists the item, a one‑line description, and the recorded outcome (as stated in the transcript). Details are limited to what was explicitly recorded during the meeting.

- Items 2, 3 and 4 (Planning and Land Use Management matters): Item 3 recorded as approved \"3 as amended\"; roll prepared and recorded as approved (11 ayes noted for one roll call). Specifics of the planning case are on file and the Planning and Land Use Management Committee motion was substituted as described on the record.

- Items 5, 6 and 7 (Ordinances): Approved on the record; separate roll calls referenced (tallies varied; one recorded 13 ayes in related business).

- Items 9, 10 and 11: Approved as recommended by council with roll calls.

- Item 12 (transfer of abandoned-vehicle enforcement to DOT): Approved as amended; transcript records a 13‑vote affirmative tally during the item.

- Item 17 (clean‑fuels policy): Approved as amended (two friendly amendments added to evaluate retrofit technologies and ultra‑low sulfur diesel testing); transcript records 14 ayes.

- Item 22 (extensions for three security contracts): Motion to extend contracts approved; transcript records 14 ayes.

- Item 8 (library bond oversight model): Called special and approved as reported; staff to provide follow-up schedule.

- Item 25: Held on the desk for later consideration; when taken the transcript records a 12‑vote affirmative tally on the item when called.

Where the transcript recorded specific roll tallies, those tallies are shown above. If the transcript did not print a roll tally adjacent to an item, the summary states approval as recorded on the meeting floor without an exact numeric tally. For detailed vote records and ordinance texts, see the official posted minutes and the city clerk record.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Regular City Council - 05/31/00","oneSentenceSummary","Summary of key council votes recorded in the transcript: planning substitutions, committee reports, ordinance approvals, item continuations and notable motions including the clean‑fuels policy and security contract extensions.","taxTitle","Los Angeles City, Los Angeles County, California","taxId",4025,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6490327,"Council approves short extensions for three city security contracts; members press for on-site evaluations",381,4316000,3935000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5555417-5dc428b529ef9f74ca1359d4bdfd7a23&start=4316&end=3935","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5555417-5dc428b529ef9f74ca1359d4bdfd7a23/thumbnail_4316000.jpg","/articles/6490327/Los-Angeles-City/Los-Angeles-County/California/Council-approves-short-extensions-for-three-city-security-contracts-members-press-for-on-site-evaluations","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6490327-f4d21ee1623e1a3ea1244f7371f2be74/orig.mp4?Expires=1773585908&Signature=j4TJabEJu1c0aXUh1reWnQr~0b4wOPctyO8j95DKRaCgvhF3VMyTz~gyEmEXBSDf5ebF3eqbcskipYYlmhAb4aNbENiNFXkzVYwzjNcBliSLFbgHoNQn9WpA3-5XElGXPT9MbroaG5jwrq-e6QtAyj4EkC40gDN4SsfOU-p8pdtVp1Ar2IxiuK2R-7trMA4kPDqmrt3ANrYU35myAMN0Yc-9pOpNaGXG~u3WrB6affhlso1u0GDd~Y60gTX05miSulIsZ65Wd5eNzyMsO5g6BADunbnhVnUhlh5eci9R4DDjL4EQIjz2n0o~t-VU8cbM1Dfke9qLjBMwdZSATTtgjw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Los Angeles City Council approved extensions to three citywide security contracts while the Department of General Services (GSD) completes a new request for proposals (RFP). Council members pressed GSD on contractor performance, living‑wage compliance and the need for on‑site evaluations before extending contracts further.

Councilmember Janice Goldberg called item 22 special and asked whether the three contractors had been evaluated for compliance with the city’s living‑wage ordinance and for service problems raised by council offices. Tony DeClupe of the General Services Department said GSD had worked with the contractors after the living‑wage ordinance was adopted and, to the department’s best knowledge, the firms were in compliance. DeClupe said GSD is seeking a 3‑ to 6‑month extension so it can finalize a complex RFP and bring it to the ITGS committee; staff reported roughly 60 contractors have expressed interest in bidding.

Councilmembers described repeated complaints about performance at particular municipal sites, including the San Pedro Municipal Building, and urged that the RFP process include performance evaluations and on‑site verification (employee interviews and wage checks). Councilmember Savornich said his office had poor experiences with two contractors and asked whether proprietary departments use the same contracts; GSD said the citywide contracts are available to all departments, including proprietary departments.

GSD committed to expedite the RFP and to terminate incumbent contracts as soon as replacement agreements are in place; the council approved the brief extension and asked that the RFP and contractor evaluations proceed promptly. The vote on the motion was recorded as 14 ayes.","The council approved brief extensions to three security contracts while General Services prepares a new RFP; members urged on-site audits and raised complaints about past contractor performance and living‑wage compliance.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6490347,"Council hears update on library bond program; Bureau of Engineering serving as program manager",521,3822000,4343000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5555417-5dc428b529ef9f74ca1359d4bdfd7a23&start=3822&end=4343","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5555417-5dc428b529ef9f74ca1359d4bdfd7a23/thumbnail_3822000.jpg","/articles/6490347/Los-Angeles-City/Los-Angeles-County/California/Council-hears-update-on-library-bond-program-Bureau-of-Engineering-serving-as-program-manager","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6490347-1ecefc6cbdb8e831e5b0ff0b1a5d6928/orig.mp4?Expires=1773585908&Signature=T8ZLHOfzPzkZcDvl2AJu1vTbRul0mgXdHfdaJgidlyocrLTXRrnKFMnNIXh38NRUfh5Yhe35RBrIwrbF2txhNJn3vZIRxS~X3s0dwPDzYTXdFYnFq0ajUcY9iNQet0fdxSnqsm9JcAa27ePPTim8qaf8wQlR4kkvfd57g00HK~b3YtzI5AS13VQEmf7ZS-Wfa3pdNnpHNTcQB9fNc60wdIw4UIkqay8LMvSLiTTfUu1QidLRW9BB4vsNkJNCEt5i0cui4Tdp1Vg84mjHLlDaGomR-386WOqtWBIKY0Tqs7IVOcKtv9-JnnWxC6DpUE7YiNbWA8ZQebaLbP~CEouOQw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Councilmembers received an update on the city’s library construction program and the Bureau of Engineering’s role as program manager for bond‑funded library projects. Staff reported the program is largely on schedule and on budget, and the council asked for a compiled schedule of anticipated completion and opening dates for each site.

Councilmember Rita Chick raised questions about the Bureau of Engineering’s expanded role and whether the arrangement is saving money and improving oversight. City staff described a steering committee model that includes the Bureau of Engineering, the City Administrative Office, the library department and outside construction managers; staff said the approach was intended to streamline project delivery and cut through internal city delays.

City staff reported there are 32 projects in the program, one was behind schedule, about half were ahead of schedule, and the remainder were on schedule. Members asked for a detailed list of anticipated construction start and opening dates; staff offered to provide a site‑by‑site schedule with projected completion dates and noted anticipated construction starts in November and January for some projects. Councilmember Hernandez asked about the Pico Union site, which staff said is near completion of escrow for two of the three properties being considered for that library.

Councilmembers praised the steering committee model for reducing internal delays and asked staff to continue tracking time, budget and quality for the remaining projects. The item was approved by the council as called special.","City staff told the council the Bureau of Engineering is acting as program manager for the library bond construction program; members heard that 32 projects are underway, one was behind schedule, and most are on budget, and they asked for a follow‑up list with anticipated opening dates.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":46,"_47":104,"_49":105,"_51":106,"_53":107,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":108,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":109,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6490356,"Council adopts alternative-fuels policy, creates interdepartmental task force for city fleet",1151,2017000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5555417-5dc428b529ef9f74ca1359d4bdfd7a23&start=2017&end=3168","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5555417-5dc428b529ef9f74ca1359d4bdfd7a23/thumbnail_2017000.jpg","/articles/6490356/Los-Angeles-City/Los-Angeles-County/California/Council-adopts-alternative-fuels-policy-creates-interdepartmental-task-force-for-city-fleet","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6490356-1cff291ba103a3716b302ba953c9ea33/orig.mp4?Expires=1773585908&Signature=n8j-YLdJI5yNtB5gorxDWlDy2kBK~0y8JGWV~vIOMDIquQx-cEjVSvd3Z1kyEoG~s3DUSpLoWtJh9FaO4J8GPN~1597K9ETqmGtIr9soBL~PGaHxTkRHfwzrUOhQuGLzcVaNHUe2aFufCJPeonQZ44hKTkfTIxuMD4WrQq2jL3k4ARjjC9kzv-~TDhj5k5NPxsQMC9ROP4VG905-y7FSYZGHfToO3Yp8kz9OsfQ67~PNT-2xxr1-Gc5F4952MnNpVUIOD~9ZBcri9kAElhJXpCHTRHC4qTK-16J6n9u3~pmCIhZ7bypnKg3PzWfpATjUqvNLDoEfgGEAj-6CiYAR7Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Los Angeles City Council approved a policy supporting alternative fuels for city vehicles, directed establishment of an interdepartmental alternative‑fuel task force, and accepted two amendments to place retrofit testing and evaluation of ultra‑low sulfur diesel and particulate traps on the task force’s agenda.

Councilmember Mark Ridley‑Thomas introduced the policy recommendation and the implementation plan, saying the motion resulted from two public hearings and that the council should balance environmental benefit with safety, efficiency and cost. Ridley‑Thomas asked the new working group to report to the Environmental Quality Committee with specific instructions and set a hearing in Environmental Quality for June 7.

Public testimony included representatives from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD), industry (Cummins Engine Company), environmental groups (Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, Coalition for Clean Air), fuel companies and a regional coalition. Jack Broadbent of AQMD urged the council to proceed because diesel particulate is a major contributor to cancer risk in the South Coast, while industry speakers such as Peter Whittingham (representing Cummins) urged a fuel‑neutral, voluntary, incentive‑driven approach, warning of high infrastructure costs for mandated conversions.

Councilmember Brunson offered two amendments — one calling for an ultra‑low sulfur diesel test program and another directing consideration of retrofit particulate filters (CRTs or similar) for existing vehicles — and characterized them as friendly. Ridley‑Thomas accepted both; he also recommended adding CARB (California Air Resources Board) to MTA and AQMD for certification/participation in testing. The council recorded a 14‑vote affirmative tally on the amended motion and approved implementation steps forthwith.

The motion creates a timeline for the task force to meet and report within two weeks to the Environmental Quality and Waste Management Committee and schedules a committee hearing on June 7 to consider recommendations, testing and potential retrofit strategies.","After public testimony from air‑quality agencies, industry and environmental groups, the Los Angeles City Council approved a clean‑fuels policy and directed formation of an interdepartmental alternative‑fuel task force with a tight schedule and consideration of retrofit technologies.",{"_33":111,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":112,"_41":90,"_43":113,"_45":114,"_47":115,"_49":116,"_51":117,"_53":118,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":119,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":120,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6490366,"City council approves transfer of abandoned-vehicle enforcement to Department of Transportation",1331000,1852000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5555417-5dc428b529ef9f74ca1359d4bdfd7a23&start=1331&end=1852","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5555417-5dc428b529ef9f74ca1359d4bdfd7a23/thumbnail_1331000.jpg","/articles/6490366/Los-Angeles-City/Los-Angeles-County/California/City-council-approves-transfer-of-abandoned-vehicle-enforcement-to-Department-of-Transportation","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6490366-8b67741aa8e912f392152c233e0130df/orig.mp4?Expires=1773585908&Signature=F0Up5ZRHIhS3Yg~eowaCIy9IxpDGby90KjS3z0i5fZkmDSkHptYeE44qxGcbQKWHibdCZrAIZ1ur6kFCwcgu0g6mC85SclCzcyj-btBvN3nxHUxmLDGVvCNl1yD9p6BASM~ILHlXrgjXat1TwcHxPJzjyHVNmDez5tNe2Z0wCw2SObJvVeRGwvVOEYDXbRK52NeAc54CtpM1-2JaXmF6mq7WS9YmQ-APj6eu1wq0UiSqLfeJsEwykBFCKVBBQAMJN3WFaSxrvRpH0JuJYzXV7~9cyYxDPiVqESKESnCE06N~vJl4BpgI4C7VUWPmn~hQesBKoL-~uZwLvjc37vSmIQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Los Angeles City Council on an administrative motion approved transferring the function of citing abandoned or illegally stored vehicles on private property from the Department of Building and Safety to the Department of Transportation (DOT). Council members amended the recommendation to require report‑backs and coordination with other city agencies before implementation.

Councilmember Rita Chick, who called the item special, asked for additional detail about safety, training and whether the shift would actually improve service. She emphasized concerns about officers entering private property and the risks they might face, including aggressive animals or hostile residents.

Jimmy Price, chief of parking enforcement operations at the Department of Transportation, told the council his agency and Building and Safety have been working in a joint task force since November 1999 to prepare for the transfer. Price said DOT intends to respond to complaints, coordinate with LAPD and Building and Safety, and deploy a specially trained “elite corps” of officers who will receive training from Building and Safety and be equipped with defensive gear including pepper spray.

Members raised concerns about overlapping responsibilities: several speakers noted that the Housing Department already inspects multifamily properties and may report abandoned vehicles as part of systematic code enforcement. Councilmembers asked that DOT coordinate protocols with Housing and Building and Safety so the transfer does not create service gaps or duplicate inspections. Councilmembers also emphasized the need for clear public contact points so callers know which agency to contact.

After discussion, council approved the item as amended, with members directing DOT to coordinate with Building and Safety and the Housing Department and to report back to relevant oversight committees. The transcript records a 13‑vote affirmative tally recorded during the item.","The Los Angeles City Council voted to transfer authority to cite abandoned or illegally stored vehicles on private property from the Department of Building and Safety to the Department of Transportation, with amendments requiring coordination and report‑backs to oversight committees.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: selected items approved by Los Angeles City Council

Council approves short extensions for three city security contracts; members press for on-site evaluations

Council hears update on library bond program; Bureau of Engineering serving as program manager

Council adopts alternative-fuels policy, creates interdepartmental task force for city fleet

City council approves transfer of abandoned-vehicle enforcement to Department of Transportation