Parole Revoked for Anthony Kenner Over Gun Incident and DNA Evidence Dispute

On August 6, 2025, the Louisiana Board of Pardons and Parole convened to address the parole status of Anthony Kenneth, who faced allegations of violating parole rules related to a vehicle chase incident. The primary focus of the hearing was Rule Number 5, which involved accusations of fleeing from law enforcement and discarding a firearm during the incident.

During the proceedings, Kenneth acknowledged his arrest but maintained his innocence regarding the actions he was accused of. He emphasized that he had been acquitted of the charges in federal court, where a jury unanimously found him not guilty based on the evidence presented. Kenneth argued that the DNA evidence linked to the firearm did not conclusively match his identity, stating that it only indicated a potential match with a male, which could include individuals with similar blood types.

The board members scrutinized the DNA evidence, which suggested a significant probability of it belonging to Kenneth. However, Kenneth countered that the evidence was not definitive and pointed out discrepancies in the testimonies of law enforcement officers involved in his case. He expressed concerns about the integrity of the evidence and the motivations of the detectives, claiming they were biased against him due to his prior parole status.

As the hearing progressed, the board members deliberated on Kenneth's fate. One member voted for revocation based on the DNA evidence and the circumstances surrounding the incident, while another member proposed a transitional work program instead of revocation, citing Kenneth's acquittal and the time he had already spent in custody.

Ultimately, the board reached a decision, with two out of three members voting to revoke Kenneth's parole. This decision reflects the complexities of parole hearings, where the board must weigh legal outcomes against perceived risks to public safety. Kenneth's case highlights ongoing discussions about the reliability of forensic evidence and the challenges faced by individuals navigating the parole system, particularly those with prior convictions. The implications of this decision may resonate within the community, as it raises questions about justice, rehabilitation, and the role of evidence in determining an individual's future.