[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6139394,"mediaKeyId","5581019-82dd20387aaa06b3939afb46a2dd92da","parentId",5581019,"title","Clark County Approves $2,100 Community-fund Contribution for College Park Security Camera After Vandalism Spate","audioSeconds",222,"startMs",7357000,"endMs",7579000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5581019-82dd20387aaa06b3939afb46a2dd92da&start=7357&end=7579","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5581019-82dd20387aaa06b3939afb46a2dd92da/thumbnail_7357000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6139394/Clark-County/Kentucky/Clark-County-Approves-2100-Community-fund-Contribution-for-College-Park-Security-Camera-After-Vandalism-Spate","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6139394-7ec8de31a21fd49f982861f97423c470/orig.mp4?Expires=1775268286&Signature=Ipved2Gd5zp2PlHfgxeVfluf8YPxE~D4ygcloVEHFCs0y46T1vPPKkMliKPvqhjpuqGr7OHkXb6e8NCTLZLRwtygZYDM41sdZVZZi~mGobXw3rI2spFduEoZm5WCOTD4ME9ysn1iSy4Ykt9ZZqmszkzYhobySDL~WoIOjTlcnsrVoh3QFyl4H8qZIjxZ7tcRe7ew~z~D3DEj4KNnu57tqlHJxZD~Qg021aQwllSk-PsTlpeMrUGTdM30Et2RyeVlpyFAxshhSUjR7bBivQwP0XK7auaX3FJcu35HCmkjZXdCR1JGkxBLYnTaghGlemcox8RMakEFOpdA76iJqEC3Zg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Clark County, KY ","date","2025-08-13T14:53:43Z","article","Clark County Fiscal Court approved a $2,100 contribution from the county'community fund to help pay for a security camera at College Park after officials described multiple recent vandalism incidents.

County and city staff described a spike in vandalism at the park over the last several weeks and presented a quote for a 3G/5G-enabled camera that can transmit over cellular networks to the 911 monitoring center. The vendor quote was about $4,397.94 (a demo unit discount from an approximately $10,000 list price), and county staff said the city and county could split the cost. The court approved a motion to cover $2,100 from the community fund for the camera; county police intend to monitor the feed through the 911 center.

Officials said cameras are a short-term measure to catch vandals and that additional capital planning will be needed for longer-term solutions across multiple parks, including the forthcoming splash pad. Court members noted that repeated vandalism can make recent capital investments (play surfaces, courts) vulnerable and argued an active monitoring camera decreases repair costs and supports enforcement.

The court discussed funding source constraints: earlier uses of the community fund and ongoing commitments mean the balance available for discretionary grants is limited, and several members asked for a plan to replenish the fund. Nevertheless, the court voted to contribute $2,100 to the College Park camera project and asked staff to return quotes for other park security and splash-pad protection as part of capital planning.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","August 13, 2025 Regular Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","After repeated vandalism at College Park, the fiscal court approved using $2,100 from the community fund toward a camera; county police will monitor the feed via 911. The full quote for the unit is roughly $4,398, and the court discussed partnership with the city and longer-term capital protection plans.","taxTitle","Clark County, Kentucky","taxId",59468,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6139399,"Clark County Forms Project Development Board to Start New Judicial Center Process",305,4025000,4330000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5581019-82dd20387aaa06b3939afb46a2dd92da&start=4025&end=4330","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5581019-82dd20387aaa06b3939afb46a2dd92da/thumbnail_4025000.jpg","/articles/6139399/Clark-County/Kentucky/Clark-County-Forms-Project-Development-Board-to-Start-New-Judicial-Center-Process","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6139399-d6c2ded629d1bb01c0048eeb41ff4665/orig.mp4?Expires=1775268286&Signature=S48O7-nrGq36fjR6Gs00102V6CGsFk6JEzQveOkdh7JGgiOdokTzpgSjrxExbADlKX6rrM-XEQjHV1-SVxU6lGktKAD4PcK8lNCgL-RKsWc0Wo0RF2~EAxeRdlH38SYpalHYtmZBXgSNTX0DGGMOYA8S0YdK3EPK30lgYiZNat0u0gk872Y-MpsQmHKnAP-7jBfISDo5wY-QJfe-aXlVS-xc-HJvsHypuOWRJP0oENno0o5TYK0yffML7T6eclNo6tEbl3vGVsIjCLGUpFwwnDcfo262-PBw5E86ijCI3-mo4bgze-5VAyxlPLHNXhteI1nTTrlFdIDpQjlkjsYTtg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Clark County Fiscal Court confirmed the formation of a project development board to begin work on a proposed new judicial center, and the court announced the board's first meeting will be Aug. 29 in the courthouse.

Court staff said the project development board is the governing body for planning and constructing the facility. The board will select an architectural firm, coordinate with the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) and the AOC's bond process, and explore site selection and footprints. County staff encouraged public attendance at the board's first meeting, calling it \"educational and interesting for all of us.\"

The court named its chair and members in open comment: the judge executive will chair the board; membership includes the senior circuit judge, the senior district judge, the circuit court clerk (Tony Kirk was named and confirmed as a member), a citizen at large (Ed Berner), and a representative of the Kentucky Bar Association. Court staff said the project is likely to be a multi-year process (staff referenced a six-year timeframe as illustrative) with the architect and site work among the first steps.

Court members clarified the new judicial center would not replace or tear down the existing courthouse; the AOC prefers single-purpose judicial buildings, and once the new facility opens the county would retain the present courthouse and handle custodial/maintenance responsibilities and potential changes in rent or occupancy.

Why it matters: A new judicial center could change space allocations, county operations (maintenance and rent responsibilities), and long-term capital obligations. The court said funding has been pursued through the state and that AOC and legislative contacts have pledged support for the project.

Next steps: The project development board will meet Aug. 29 to begin architect selection and initial planning. The court encouraged public engagement at upcoming board meetings.","The fiscal court confirmed a project development board to oversee planning for a new judicial center; the board will select an architect and begin design and bond planning.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6139404,"Clark County Discusses Short-term Loans, Keiko Financing and Capital Priorities as Cash Tightens",1141,2109000,3250000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5581019-82dd20387aaa06b3939afb46a2dd92da&start=2109&end=3250","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5581019-82dd20387aaa06b3939afb46a2dd92da/thumbnail_2109000.jpg","/articles/6139404/Clark-County/Kentucky/Clark-County-Discusses-Short-term-Loans-Keiko-Financing-and-Capital-Priorities-as-Cash-Tightens","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6139404-d877ff9d62295e59fe0aa48213626576/orig.mp4?Expires=1775268286&Signature=mMe7URARe1CJkYzdDCA2E7yiq74Onr0pUFQncVXR0vlInp1vvb8CNlY0aTksGtj7jIkkO6KHouQBf89exAY-vHfyUeYPm~HsdlvhjTCRgT2XCNUJ3zY2OT9gSKHut0jzH-98Z3UzsFO~fnZj7g0AxJcpqHqTnNBlq3yv4NF2n-elCLTjhw4YVPOalzUWa~Xwo8cUTikSpBZ4btVl32EQK9UmhQm4XON9CmbQ~9odEyVHAltwpn3l6sY4Xx9IOuDqWeyywy1cO5R3fcQf-ns2h7WCOW9sWEOsUuYerGbB47gH69s-KcklLEKWdMUlNQ16cs1vj~HfG8fY-zTr6aKWng__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Clark County fiscal leaders spent a large portion of Thursday's meeting reviewing near-term cash constraints and options to cover urgent capital and vendor obligations.

Court members discussed multiple short-term and medium-term financing tools: a tax revenue anticipation note (borrowing against property-tax receipts until collections arrive), short-term loans from Keiko (as presented in a financing breakdown for 5/10/15-year terms), and longer bonds to consolidate outstanding liabilities. No formal loan authorization was taken at the meeting; the court discussed obtaining a short-term loan large enough to cover immediate needs (participants suggested $400,000'$500,000 as an example) and then rolling short-term borrowing into a bond package later after assembling a master capital list.

County staff and elected officials identified immediate cash needs including a roughly $125,000 Suresco (Park & Rec) payment for a dehumidifier replacement and other capital items the court had previously approved in part. Court members repeatedly said they want a master capital-improvements list from all departments so Compass (a consulting/financing firm discussed in the packet) can evaluate consolidation and bonding options. One commissioner framed it as a multiyear plan: \"we need to come up with a whole capital improvements plan... 5, 6, 7, 10 years so we know...\" (magistrate comment).

Court members raised risks: borrowing more against property tax receipts increases liabilities and monthly debt service; financing large items such as a fire truck or a purchased building would require longer-term structuring and may not address the immediate shortfall. The court discussed using a short-term Keiko loan as a bridge to give staff time to compile the full capital list and work with Compass on a bond package.

On Suresco/payments: staff said the county had paid a $125,000 deposit earlier (ARPA money was used for part of the prior payment), and that a financing path was needed to complete the agreement. The county'administrator and finance staff said they could shift appropriations temporarily (for instance using Parks & Rec appropriations) to produce the cash and then do a budget amendment when loan proceeds or reimbursements are received.

Discussion-only versus action: The court did not adopt a formal loan resolution at the meeting. The court did direct staff informally to seek short-term Keiko financing options, compile a department-by-department capital list for Compass, and evaluate a tax revenue anticipation note sufficient to cover near-term obligations. Staff and the judge said they would return with more detailed loan terms and a proposed financing plan at a future meeting.

Context: Officials noted recurring constraints (workers'comp and insurance bills, increased administrative costs, and lingering CSIP/CS code project payments) and emphasized the need to avoid long-term financing for items with shorter useful lives (for example, excluding automobiles from 10-year financing). The court repeatedly emphasized balancing short-term liquidity needs against longer-term debt service implications.

Follow-up: Staff were asked to contact Keiko to determine maximum short-term loan amounts available and to assemble the capital project inventory for Compass before the court schedules bond or consolidation options for formal consideration.","Fiscal Court discussed short-term borrowing options including a tax revenue anticipation note and financing through Keiko to cover immediate obligations, and directed staff to compile a coordinated capital projects list for bond financing and consolidation of liabilities.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6139409,"Clark County Sets Property Tax Rate at 8% After PVA Questions Compensating-rate Calculation",3539,1349000,4888000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5581019-82dd20387aaa06b3939afb46a2dd92da&start=1349&end=4888","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5581019-82dd20387aaa06b3939afb46a2dd92da/thumbnail_1349000.jpg","/articles/6139409/Clark-County/Kentucky/Clark-County-Sets-Property-Tax-Rate-at-8-After-PVA-Questions-Compensating-rate-Calculation","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6139409-97bb12cc3bb6343ac717e6d0270c7c90/orig.mp4?Expires=1775268286&Signature=M63Q50~I6ETYR~0bOq4nvXA~COj92-nPJHYhfuBXKQ~llzYCOO9tC9wICIWU6uBjYyTnCcMAI9XMFms8nvPXfasZFHdTlm4JHCoFaeHrAdjtxCfcSA~SokzmjjmLjTb6-546FtXauxGl4grzLIsoQWY1waLWL54B~8aClHFEym2m-oBBO1MEiX3FeftzqWg9obL8lUVgIUYDjzNG-jDdhfbzHBaQ8RBnv37Bn9D-vnU1aGEJbHlK4Tf6tuLKar5pyWp2f7P~EMo9Zf6Rsx-RXyLI7ehSfKFHsLtW6PYX2nzSiRAJRycgivH8Z~wF18-wXXBUOWev2wTYnFNhAGCZ3w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Clark County Fiscal Court voted Thursday to set the county'wide property tax rate at 8% for the coming year after a public presentation and internal debate about how the state calculates the compensating rate.

Brady, the county'property valuation administrator (PVA), told the court that rising assessed values in 2025 should produce a lower compensating rate if real and personal (tangible) property are calculated separately. Brady said the Department of Local Government'calculation produced a weighted average compensating rate of 7.8 per $100 of assessed value but that the true compensating rate for real property alone computes to about 7.5443 per $100. \"I know 0.01 feels like nothing,\" Brady said, \"But I'm doing everything I can to abide by the Kentucky constitution and do what's best for Clark County.\" Brady urged the court to consider the lower rate or to reserve the right to appeal the certified rate.

The PVA cited House Bill 44 and KRS 132.10 Section 6 and pointed to an Attorney General opinion and Department of Local Government paperwork in the packet. Brady argued that the first sentence of KRS 132.10(6) excludes personal property from the compensating-rate calculation and that the later use of \"all\" in the statute has produced a weighted average interpretation that combines real and tangible property.

Judge Yates and other court members discussed the legal uncertainty and short-term fiscal needs of the county. The judge made clear the court must \"go based on what Robert Brown is saying,\" referring to the local certification by the state/local finance office cited in the packet. Several magistrates noted the dollar impact on a typical homeowner would be small; Brady estimated the difference between the certified weighted average and the PVA'preferred calculation would be less than $100 on an average single-family bill.

After debate and the statutorily required public hearing earlier in the day, a motion to set the county'wide property tax rate at 8% carried by voice vote.

Why it matters: The compensating-rate calculation determines whether a taxing district can maintain the same property-tax revenue after reassessments. Clark County's large assessment increases this year — Brady told the court the county'wide assessed value grew by roughly $100 million — led the PVA to press whether real and personal property calculations should be separated. The court's choice to set the rate at 8% preserves current revenue but leaves open the legal question Brady raised.

The fiscal court did not adopt any formal legal appeal at the meeting; Brady invited the court or interested parties to pursue clarification through state channels.

The court approved the rate by voice vote; no roll-call record of individual yea/nay votes was given in the meeting minutes.","Clark County Fiscal Court voted to keep the property tax rate at 8% after a presentation from the county property valuation administrator (PVA) that challenged how the state'calculated the compensating rate and explained why assessments are rising.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Clark County Approves $2,100 Community-fund Contribution for College Park Security Camera After Vandalism Spate

Clark County Forms Project Development Board to Start New Judicial Center Process

Clark County Discusses Short-term Loans, Keiko Financing and Capital Priorities as Cash Tightens

Clark County Sets Property Tax Rate at 8% After PVA Questions Compensating-rate Calculation