[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6139355,"mediaKeyId","5581055-a180937c1a7efb31732978c2a16f5330","parentId",5581055,"title","DRB closes hearing on after‑the‑fact Tesla outdoor display; staff cites non‑waivable gated‑access rule","audioSeconds",246,"startMs",1196000,"endMs",1442000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5581055-a180937c1a7efb31732978c2a16f5330&start=1196&end=1442","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5581055-a180937c1a7efb31732978c2a16f5330/thumbnail_1196000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6139355/South-Burlington-City/Chittenden-County/Vermont/DRB-closes-hearing-on-afterthefact-Tesla-outdoor-display-staff-cites-nonwaivable-gatedaccess-rule","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6139355-b999a0299153e09462c076b5f18e80e1/orig.mp4?Expires=1771215335&Signature=Rsdiff6Wa9BKSIPPESkA-B6vnAqh0FfBxfOMMqoTNkrURPCHeOM18-qCI9IYM9x~jl20Tl2wTFmI6o~xmokXWrqzNAij01eDQ~a-kIRAmdpV695~iNpspfOgUD3iEr8DE35Pa-63zimpVWSnFhbCxrO1wR4KEYMgzdbgxT7b1WspQSXm3mZwFEVACXHCM3ikvrA7UsFA9QeIBebLvICOelPrFJ0xH-0Qe3e4D-mNnky6GQh47DAFNoOztfAljGzig0z8azPdUQ9Wr6I4FGMxN3Is5NDq2m5D7tSMlLXO4Mzx8Pqb0yN2YBOlHrkVg~RrQglXEZ3U~3nCOi52rrb0IA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","South Burlington City, VT","date","2025-08-07T16:01:14Z","article","The South Burlington Development Review Board on Aug. 5 closed the public hearing on Tesla’s after‑the‑fact site plan amendment for an outdoor display area at 218 Hannaford Drive after the applicant described the change as an oversight and staff identified a non‑waivable gated‑access restriction.

What was before the board: Tesla applied for an after‑the‑fact amendment (SP2529) to add an outdoor display area at its Hannaford Drive site. The draft decision in the packet noted that the applicant had installed lockable gates across some vehicular access points and that “15 a, 10 a, 5 c prohibits gated access to neighborhoods in all circumstances and is not a waivable criteria.” The draft directed that the gates be removed prior to issuing a certificate of occupancy for the outdoor storage.

Applicant response: Kevan (applicant, development/planning representative) said the display was not included in the original filing due to “a mistake…a misunderstanding of what would and what wasn't allowed.” Michael Seager, who identified himself as part of the Tesla team, estimated the display area might need space for about “75 to a 100” unregistered vehicles as a conservative upper bound but said the site typically moves vehicles quickly and that it would be “pretty much always be under that number.” William Port also appeared for the applicant.

Zoning and nonconformity: Planning staff explained that the frontage parking/layout was a preexisting nonconformity inherited from the site’s prior use as a Hannaford supermarket, developed before the current rule prohibiting front‑of‑building parking. Staff told the board that converting the front area to an outdoor display for unsold vehicles does not increase the degree of nonconformity; the board discussed that framing but did not take a final position at the hearing.

Security and compliance: Staff read the draft decision language requiring removal of the gates prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The applicant said the gates had already been removed at the time of the meeting.

Public comment and outcome: No members of the public offered comment. The board closed the hearing; staff will prepare a final written decision clarifying conditions for the display, including the requirement that any retained gates be removed before final occupancy certification.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","South Burlington Development Review Board - 8/5/2025","oneSentenceSummary","The South Burlington Development Review Board on Aug. 5 closed the hearing on Tesla’s after‑the‑fact site plan amendment for an outdoor vehicle display at 218 Hannaford Drive after staff flagged a non‑waivable restriction on gated access and the applicant described the installation as an oversight.","taxTitle","South Burlington City, Chittenden County, Vermont","taxId",2752,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6139360,"DRB closes review of Burlington International Airport hangar amendments after design, wetlands and screening questions",446,170000,616000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5581055-a180937c1a7efb31732978c2a16f5330&start=170&end=616","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5581055-a180937c1a7efb31732978c2a16f5330/thumbnail_170000.jpg","/articles/6139360/South-Burlington-City/Chittenden-County/Vermont/DRB-closes-review-of-Burlington-International-Airport-hangar-amendments-after-design-wetlands-and-screening-questions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6139360-759fbc8343c1da08bf04f5c26163249b/orig.mp4?Expires=1771215335&Signature=nDjFjfdgnaYcIecd7jj3Z4OcZWzslR~cBHw~WUGUtTvz2YFenhUx4QQdyh1nPZNt4FPkLclKNhA2rAlATi3cwCUZhUCoJejuqAKqxjsRqgLUxcsKG3~YzVG-pT~moX44Q~JWml0Nbj3Egj4-qJUMhhEZKYVcK8idFPKd00EHpXWjje2AlVWxmP57tFiCxg9Rh36uYpu5xkJUC9lRywRMujAnHlPNzwjkn5fMTAaMqHWLsthqMtmI4zG8wUn-4F-zSaJjFHp1RqOMKvC0FkhJvee9Zv5Zubyd0CR4J6noGRN454ur2nwDBECnXkDBVYv37QMJpuBjiYrCvySxnipUgw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The South Burlington Development Review Board on Aug. 5 closed hearings on two related Burlington International Airport applications after staff and applicants addressed design, wetlands and screening issues.

Board members reviewed a master‑plan amendment (MP2501) that the packet describes as adding a 14,200‑square‑foot hangar accessed via Aviation Avenue at 1200 Airport Drive and a site plan (SB2527) that the packet describes as constructing an approximately 13,800‑square‑foot hangar at the south end of the master‑plan area.

Staff and applicants: Staff asked the board whether revised architectural drawings meet the board’s suggested design criteria and raised three technical items: (1) confirmation that the project’s footprint does not contain wetlands and documentation to demonstrate that; (2) landscaping and screening material and placement; and (3) screening around a previously un‑screened utility cabinet. Applicants present included Chris Gendron of Stantec, Cynthia Silvey of Wagner Hudson and Larry Lackey of the Burlington International Airport; Marla Keane and Betsy Brown represented city staff.

Why it matters: The hangar additions are part of the airport’s concurrent master‑plan amendment and site plan work and touch on environmental compliance (wetlands), airport operations and how the building will be screened from adjacent areas.

Wetlands and documentation: Chris Gendron told the board that “there was a wetland delineation done in 2021 or so for the road, and the wetlands are very far away from this project site,” and that the applicants had provided that report to staff. Staff asked the board whether that existing delineation was sufficiently close to the new apron and hangar area or whether an additional, focused delineation should be required; staff said the 2021 study had been provided after the packet was published.

Design and landscaping: Board member Mark Baer, who led the design discussion at the prior meeting, said the revised drawings were an improvement and added: “I think it’s okay for what we’re reviewing here.” The applicant said they had revised the building entry and added windows at the lobby area to improve the façade facing public ingress and egress.

Screening and site amenities: The applicant revised its planting plan after board feedback. Red twig dogwood proposed for screening near a utility enclosure was replaced with a loose arrangement of about nine arborvitae planted at a size that complies with a sitewide plant height limit described in the packet (applicants said they would not exceed the hard 25‑foot limit for plant material). Applicants also added juniper shrubs, roughly 4–5 feet tall, to screen a utility cabinet and proposed surrounding an existing utility structure with a 6‑foot black chain‑link fence for security; arborvitae will be planted outside the fence to provide screening. Staff noted the deciduous species would be leafless in colder months and asked whether the revised plant list provided adequate winter screening; the applicant responded by substituting evergreen material for the critical screening locations.

Public comment and board action: There were no public comments on either application. After discussion the board closed both hearings; the motion to close MP2501 was made and seconded on the record and the board voted in favor. The packet recommendation to continue was revised in light of the supplemental materials submitted between packet publication and the hearing. The board indicated decisions will follow after staff prepares final findings and a draft decision for each application.

What remains: Staff had flagged the wetland documentation question for the record; applicants said the 2021 delineation had been provided to staff and that wetlands are distant from the immediate project area. The board did not vote to approve construction at the hearing; it closed the public hearings and will issue formal written decisions after staff finishes final conditions.

","The South Burlington Development Review Board on Aug. 5 closed hearings on two related Burlington International Airport applications after staff and applicants addressed design, wetlands and screening issues.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

DRB closes hearing on after‑the‑fact Tesla outdoor display; staff cites non‑waivable gated‑access rule

DRB closes review of Burlington International Airport hangar amendments after design, wetlands and screening questions