[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6482953,"mediaKeyId","5588440-01b1f3a24d794386c07846b89129909b","parentId",5588440,"title","Farr West planning commission sets Oct.–Nov. timetable for general‑plan update and forms subcommittees","audioSeconds",1079,"startMs",3625615,"endMs",4705220,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5588440-01b1f3a24d794386c07846b89129909b&start=3625&end=4705","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5588440-01b1f3a24d794386c07846b89129909b/thumbnail_3625615.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6482953/Farr-West/Weber-County/Utah/Farr-West-planning-commission-sets-OctNov-timetable-for-generalplan-update-and-forms-subcommittees","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6482953-284eacb86000408b2b5f2bd92f9bcbb3/orig.mp4?Expires=1776238894&Signature=bTqwgAxK4F1bmVXRdEyaXOrRdu1wl6tWRtNU5xweE0EJ7bPwzOfmo7tUkWdJfGosukW2oM3hG9~NN7HHpaZVszrF9WbBljK1eCnnyJRJQENFPUE~wUilVTNT7RxoFUFsD-1jT39zXZdb0fHS1EBdVgTng0-tMzPdfIueXFh2SMxWRQcPP2pBTkvMWSkLUotDDgoqVBH3Eh3GMVcz5slCBD9B5BeEg8EVo9xPM1MHIwc4zg43tZ-AvQX1gTihqxJQEQTABDYtqCwdx64SW82Df1mnWKOA9v8tM653BVSM-l0dhEHmG5lN4l5ssy4nCw0dQDuoRUbJ8V8NQ3UxTHWzPQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Farr West","date","2025-08-14T19:15:52Z","article","At a work session, Farr West planning commissioners reviewed redline edits to the city’s general plan and agreed on a timeline and subcommittee structure to complete the update.

Speaker 2, Planning staff, outlined key dates and deliverables: \"Subcommittees will report on October 9 in our work session. Open house October 22, tentatively. And, public hearing on the new general plan, November 13.\" The group agreed to form subcommittees for roads/traffic/active transportation, parks, and housing; staff also said several technical elements must be updated before public outreach, including maps to match Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC) datasets, and photo updates for a facilities section. Staff noted a name change: Dominion Energy references should be updated to Enbridge and that Meadows Park’s approximate location is 2400 West and 2700 North.

Commission discussion ranged from how strictly to state road design preferences in the general plan (debate over language about half‑cul‑de‑sacs and knuckles) to clarifying access statements for 1900 West. Speaker 6, Committee member, said the economic development and future land‑use pieces would require a joint meeting with city council because they involve broader policy and financial implications.

Practical next steps recorded at the work session: staff will circulate redline drafts to planning commissioners and city council, subcommittees will meet and report on progress by Oct. 9, staff will prepare materials for an open house tentatively set for Oct. 22, and the planning commission will hold a public hearing on the updated general plan on Nov. 13. The commission asked staff to compile map PDFs from WFRC, swap the specified photos, and prepare a short, three‑page development‑agreement template the commission could use for site‑specific cases.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Planning Commission Work Session 8.14.25","oneSentenceSummary","Commissioners and staff reviewed redline edits to the general plan, formed subcommittees (roads/active transportation, parks, housing), assigned technical homework (map updates, photos, naming updates) and set a schedule: report Oct. 9, open house Oct. 22 (tentative) and public hearing Nov. 13.","taxTitle","Farr West, Weber County, Utah","taxId",7500,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6482958,"Staff recommends development agreement for Peterson 28‑acre site; roller‑coaster building must be removed before occupancy",692,553695,1246280,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5588440-01b1f3a24d794386c07846b89129909b&start=553&end=1246","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5588440-01b1f3a24d794386c07846b89129909b/thumbnail_553695.jpg","/articles/6482958/Farr-West/Weber-County/Utah/Staff-recommends-development-agreement-for-Peterson-28acre-site-rollercoaster-building-must-be-removed-before-occupancy","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6482958-34d9f14a1054e25eb17e4d09e91d45c2/orig.mp4?Expires=1776238894&Signature=VD2RbLzVvVbEcca0467yOC5oneaapb5cW9kNw3gypC~dlOohDbQ95ZOiqHgZMT98EvDazDt2yfrKtgIj4ULpa7iz~WYyiLPiNXa04n4fAEcY30a5SwjlLGO63fbJjB2DGxLz9AQUSiEfq0ajucFKw4uAYxk7Xus5m5zYE7NxPNx-lP3cZDBAHe8D7xhBQLcPe01a4LqmjeExj7mQ0LsEVRHK5xsUtnNQNCzzNXWocB48-7unZ-9lr0oY7BdV~FYqoXmqDdVgLQ0dwKYFQ3g9EL3UdMjCVFg6EjXiz~3ZQr~NQMQu6WqADa9QxV4hYQZbWYbYf0aLTojTZnv3NvaLDw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Farr West planning staff outlined a proposed development agreement to bring a 28‑acre site associated with Peterson into incremental compliance with city code. Under the draft approach, a 7‑acre expansion would use a 0.7‑acre park as the open‑space credit for that parcel under a one‑time agreement; the remainder of the site would be subject to full compliance for any future changes.

Speaker 6, Committee member, summarized the proposal: \"This would be 7 acres of where their new building is going to be or new expansion. And that 7 acre site would use the 0.7 acre park that's over here as its open space under a development agreement that allows...\" He said the developer has drafted a development agreement and staff will add requirements and have Liam review it. The agreement would require the developer to provide storm‑drain calculations, utility as‑builts and other technical documents for the entire 28‑acre parcel and to demolish the roller‑coaster building \"before occupancy happens on the new building.\" (Speaker 6, Committee member.)

Staff described why a development agreement is being pursued: the parcel lacks an original site plan, so a standalone addition cannot meet current M‑1 zoning setbacks and the city’s 10% open‑space requirement. Speaker 6 said the approach allows one parcel to be brought into compliance now while requiring that any future work across the remaining acreage must meet code. \"If they do anything else on the whole 28 acre parcel, they need to then bring their rest of the site in compliance as they do it,\" he said.

Commission discussion included stormwater and utility concerns. One participant noted the site’s piping \"is all undersized, but it works\" (Speaker 1, Committee member). Staff said Western Irrigation or other water‑right holders will need to sign or provide agreements where canal siphons are affected. The draft development agreement was described as short and specific; staff planned to circulate it to the commission and to meet with the developer (Matt and Nate) the following morning to confirm technical needs.

Actions described at the work session: staff will finalize edits to the developer‑drafted agreement, have legal (Liam) review the document, and tentatively notice the development agreement for public hearing at the next planning commission meeting. The agreement will state the park may be used once as open‑space credit for the 7‑acre expansion, require full site documentation (storm drains, utilities, as‑builts), and record the demolition requirement for the roller‑coaster structure prior to occupancy. No formal vote or adoption occurred during the work session.","Planning staff described a proposed development agreement allowing a 7‑acre expansion to use a 0.7‑acre park as required open space once, contingent on submitting site‑wide utilities and stormwater documents and demolishing a roller‑coaster structure before occupancy of the new building.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6482963,"Farr West staff to seek minor accessory‑building height increase; setback unchanged",376,44524,421200,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5588440-01b1f3a24d794386c07846b89129909b&start=44&end=421","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5588440-01b1f3a24d794386c07846b89129909b/thumbnail_44524.jpg","/articles/6482963/Farr-West/Weber-County/Utah/Farr-West-staff-to-seek-minor-accessorybuilding-height-increase-setback-unchanged","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6482963-2cb1bc766c8cb4e28909e525cec87f5b/orig.mp4?Expires=1776238895&Signature=X1ng9VRgRqSIKwnTlkGdUd8ndk6~AD31dXWfu~Ne4BeEonXZ2T6vsizV-5bC6aHiYbfUhK2vmBfW2Y1vCCOq8CFNk2Lf4r3rSZV-Hzi2wZSeK5XpUG4EEr0uL-3P6hZ-kbLCo0iYPXAk4K2QqcGbxmscb7Lcz8Z~Lc2FX3jznp~whAYhQ4CKokhfXlyzVnaNsQgWj9~VQPAOQ4Nmh-1uTwNBbyHvS6okPO0rJ20LH3ZgcVhi4mnSCNRphAbZa-XPuggzINuv~UFX0iAhkv7eHU87GfrjgDKjQnRe-AvRtLD3HLBiyMPPjGJxTwepoRpXb9qjaq8ycBizTPfwJHS5dQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Farr West planning staff said they will place a draft amendment on the agenda to raise the maximum peak height for accessory buildings on lots smaller than one acre from 20 feet to 21 feet and the maximum exterior wall height from 15 feet to 16 feet, while retaining the 10‑foot setback requirement.

Planning staff described the change as narrowly targeted to accommodate taller standard garage doors. Speaker 2, Planning staff, said, \"the maximum height at its peak is 20 feet, and the exterior walls is 15 feet. Nate has asked that we increase that at the peak to 21 feet and the exterior walls to 16 feet. The reason being is the standard garage door size is 14 feet, and it will help it'll allow the residents to get high profile vehicles such as RVs and things like that into their garage of their building.\" The staff member added that the 12‑inch increase was considered minor: \"12 inches is insignificant.\" (Speaker 2, Planning staff.)

The commission members present emphasized that the lateral setback would not change. Speaker 2 said the planning office will post the item as a public hearing at the next public meeting so the proposed wording change can be considered formally; staff cautioned against telling applicants a change is final before the city adopts it. \"I wouldn't give him the green light until we've actually sanctioned this in our city,\" one participant said (Speaker 3, Committee member). Speaker 2 confirmed the amendment will be transmitted to Liam for legal review before formal notice and public hearing.

No vote or final ordinance was recorded at the work session; the item was described as being prepared for a public hearing at the next applicable meeting. The staff presentation noted the change applies only to lots under one acre and that applicants already waiting on the amendment had been informed the proposal was in process.","Planning staff proposed raising accessory‑building peak height from 20 to 21 feet and exterior wall height from 15 to 16 feet for lots under 1 acre to accommodate taller garage doors; staff said the 10‑foot setback will remain and the change will go to public hearing.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Farr West planning commission sets Oct.–Nov. timetable for general‑plan update and forms subcommittees

Staff recommends development agreement for Peterson 28‑acre site; roller‑coaster building must be removed before occupancy

Farr West staff to seek minor accessory‑building height increase; setback unchanged