Williamson County Constable Jeff Anderson advocates for salary increase amid compensation disparities

On August 15, 2025, a salary grievance hearing was held in Williamson County, Texas, focusing on the compensation of elected constables. The meeting highlighted concerns regarding the disparity in pay between elected constables and their staff, who are compensated under the county's established salary structure, known as the "L chart."

Constable Jeff Anderson, representing Precinct 2, opened the discussion by emphasizing the dedication and service of elected officials in law enforcement. He pointed out that while constables are responsible for significant public safety duties, their compensation does not reflect the level of commitment and training they have undertaken. Anderson, who has served in law enforcement for nearly four decades, argued for a salary increase of 2% above that of chief deputies, regardless of whether constables are placed on the L chart.

The committee addressed questions regarding the definition of tenure and experience, clarifying that the county uses verified years of service from the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement (TCOL) rather than solely counting years served in Williamson County. This distinction is crucial as it impacts how salaries are calculated for constables returning from previous law enforcement roles.

Additionally, the meeting touched on the liability concerns faced by elected officials. It was noted that there have been very few instances—less than ten in the past five years—where elected officials faced personal lawsuits, with the county typically covering legal costs. This support underscores the county's commitment to its elected officials, provided they operate within their authority.

The discussions during the hearing reflect broader issues of compensation equity and the recognition of public service roles in law enforcement. As the committee considers the salary grievance, the outcome could set a precedent for how elected officials are compensated in Williamson County, potentially influencing future policy decisions regarding the L chart and the treatment of constables.

In conclusion, the hearing not only addressed immediate salary concerns but also raised important questions about the value placed on public service and the need for fair compensation in law enforcement roles. The committee's decision will be pivotal in shaping the future of elected officials' compensation in the county.