Board of Adjustment Approves Variances for King William Pool and Garage Setbacks

The San Antonio Zoning Board of Adjustment convened on August 18, 2025, to discuss several variance requests, focusing on properties within the King William Historic District and other areas. The meeting addressed two primary cases, both involving requests for variances from established zoning regulations.

The first case involved a request for multiple variances related to a residential swimming pool located on East Gunther Street. The applicant sought a 2 foot 5 inch variance from the minimum 5 foot side setback, a 13 foot 5 inch variance from the minimum 20 foot garage entry setback, and a 3 foot 6 inch variance from the minimum 15 foot driveway clear vision area. The property, situated within the historic district, had previously received a permit for the pool, but an inspection revealed that it did not comply with the required setbacks, leading to the need for these variances.

During the discussion, staff recommended approval of the variances, citing that they would not impact public safety or alter the district's character. The board received 32 notices regarding the request, with two in favor and one opposition from the King William Neighborhood Association, which opposed only the side setback variance. The applicant, Jason Gallardo, explained that the pool's construction had been halted due to the setback issue, despite having received prior approvals. After deliberation, the board unanimously approved the requested variances, emphasizing the unique circumstances of the property and the lack of significant opposition.

The second case presented by Vanessa Rubio involved a request for a 3 foot 4 inch variance from the minimum 5 foot side setback for a new residential structure on Elks Drive. The applicant aimed to preserve the historically established side setback of the original home, which had been reduced over time. Staff recommended approval, noting that the variance would maintain the historical character of the property. However, the Tierra Linda Neighborhood Association opposed the request, citing potential risks to the neighborhood.

Rubio, who purchased the property with her father, expressed her commitment to following proper procedures and obtaining necessary permits. The board discussed the opposition and the applicant's lack of prior contact with the neighborhood association. Ultimately, the board's decision on this case remains pending as further discussions are needed.

In conclusion, the meeting highlighted the board's commitment to balancing historical preservation with the needs of property owners, as well as the importance of community engagement in the zoning process. The board's decisions reflect a careful consideration of the unique circumstances surrounding each variance request.