[{"_1":2,"_100":-5,"_101":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6503022,"mediaKeyId","5596959-e77706cc63a09539ad963aebc7b9a8e0","parentId",5596959,"title","Votes at a glance: Assembly passes several concurrence bills and resolutions June 4, 2025","audioSeconds",44,"startMs",8139179,"endMs",8184000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5596959-e77706cc63a09539ad963aebc7b9a8e0&start=8139&end=8184","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5596959-e77706cc63a09539ad963aebc7b9a8e0/thumbnail_8139179.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6503022/California/Votes-at-a-glance-Assembly-passes-several-concurrence-bills-and-resolutions-June-4-2025","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6503022-9e84e59c7bbf8e13e7e7c06c9d367740/orig.mp4?Expires=1773556879&Signature=jocvnJRXW1ZSjTZJchxhfMReVHU1mj5mIEGL7JFWgZH2~x56S~uo1IC6ienh7JHC9CZPPPAkla08gvUs9j~Wg-hPMH1p~FWgd~u8OqGhoW-g9LFE6sySnxDMzkxvBexDnfbuyRP2sYyLQnJM33884NxOFx0NKlolbNIBr0tnbgtIt1eCwTtDqVH44bBpbP2Y42cIJX0i~4cnb-p~PgmEx~Ww3JmR7CJt3llA6cA992Y8cTV2g6FtB5ArP8jRpJ5VbeANeWL9yLRrrzM6BLLmqDFM38ZAecL1unASknUEBQkHaBIS-Q6TVBHv4NbpNY4fR4ZX05F~pxp7~Y8rPqkajw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","California State Assembly","date","2025-08-18T00:00:00Z","article","The California Assembly on June 4, 2025, passed a set of bills on concurrence and adopted several resolutions and recognitions. Most measures were noncontroversial and received unanimous or near-unanimous support on roll-call or voice votes.

Key floor actions and outcomes recorded in the transcript:

- AB 829 (Sharp Collins) — changes the name referenced in a neurodegenerative disease program to the Richard Paul Lehi Parkinson's Disease Program and makes an appropriation; sponsor described the amendment as technical. Roll-call recorded: Ayes 70, Noes 0. Senate amendments concurred.

- AB 463 (Michelle Rodriguez et al.) — emergency medical services-related bill returned on concurrence with minor technical amendments; sponsor said the bill \"will help save the lives of our public safety partners.\" Roll-call: Ayes 71, Noes 0. Senate amendments concurred.

- AB 493 (Harabidian) — closes a loophole to ensure homeowners receive at least 2% interest on post-loss insurance funds held in escrow; sponsor said there was no opposition. Roll-call: Ayes 75, Noes 0. Senate amendments concurred.

- AB 1387 (Quirk Silva) — authorizes counties to create multidisciplinary teams coordinating mental health services for justice-involved individuals. Sponsor reported bipartisan support and no opposition. Roll-call: Ayes 71, Noes 0.

- ACR 102 (Ramos) — Assembly Concurrent Resolution recognizing California Native American Day and the California Indian Cultural Awareness Conference; adopted by voice vote after 71 coauthors were recorded.

- HR 44 (Ward) — House Resolution recognizing homeless service providers; clerk recorded 64 coauthors and the resolution was adopted by voice vote.

- ACR 100 (Kalra) — Concurrent resolution honoring India's Independence Day; clerk recorded 71 coauthors and the resolution was adopted by voice vote.

- HR 48 (Pellerin/Schiavo) — House Resolution marking the 105th anniversary of the Nineteenth Amendment; clerk recorded 73 coauthors and the resolution was adopted by voice vote.

Most concurrence items were passed and retained on file or sent to third reading as required by Assembly procedure. Where roll-call tallies were recorded in the transcript, they are listed above. The transcript does not record any shelving or vetoes of these measures; those actions would appear in subsequent official journals if taken.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Assembly Floor Session (1)","oneSentenceSummary","The Assembly passed several concurrence bills and adopted multiple resolutions on June 4, 2025, with most measures receiving unanimous or near-unanimous support.","taxTitle","California State Assembly, House, Legislative, California","taxId",17099,"location","California","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6503026,"Assembly floor dispute over referrals: appeals sustain speaker and motions on SB 280/ACA 8 split the chamber",175,4070530,4246000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5596959-e77706cc63a09539ad963aebc7b9a8e0&start=4070&end=4246","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5596959-e77706cc63a09539ad963aebc7b9a8e0/thumbnail_4070530.jpg","/articles/6503026/California/Assembly-floor-dispute-over-referrals-appeals-sustain-speaker-and-motions-on-SB-280ACA-8-split-the-chamber","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6503026-5fa5b6e31b2973c2fd384179f639383e/orig.mp4?Expires=1773556879&Signature=ODJDSVgtvYTf3SmycEZznR2F65TBVTEUx68SVB6KoWCCCL5GgZs1OkJcXnt7NTC8U1lEiY9ko7sMNIiK6Z2IuTPDKfLFE91q2B5cDoM-ifIcOzqfqAAtgMyHiRaxUpzzMySBrzA55mHFBW1HMMk0TqXYb9UKSWEo~bw2khMlAWXpAyFEmQw2XuAP0gS6DjLwfmYDlj~ksCagPA10NIgO38lelkS~e55aaD-RiaV6uhwK0V4~9oQ~GGj-4EPV9-wBsQyn67zWc6mU1oVy1NDQtdeIpHcDal2gHS499gnOnGWRo3IRTZKEd5-fzgunGk52~YHyII2iMYyx-TScyFvzhQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","A contentious procedural sequence over committee referrals consumed a portion of the California Assembly floor on June 4, 2025, as members debated how to process SB 280 (Cervantes) and ACA 8.

Speaker Robert Rivas referred SB 280 to the Elections and Appropriations committees under Assembly Rule 77.2. Assemblymember DeMaio raised a point of order citing Article IV, Section 8(a) of the California Constitution and appealed the speaker's referral. The appeal required a second and was not debatable; the clerk recorded a roll-call vote that sustained the speaker's decision, Ayes 46, Nos 18, on the first appeal.

Later, Assemblymember Gallagher pressed points of order regarding germaneness under Rule 92 and sought to have SB 280 and ACA 8 re-referred to Elections and Judiciary committees. Gallagher's motion to re-refer failed on a roll-call vote, Ayes 18, Noes 48.

The chair's rulings were appealed multiple times during the back-and-forth. One appeal of the chair's decision was sustained by a roll-call vote of Ayes 49, Noes 17; another was sustained Ayes 52, Noes 15 in a later challenge. After those rulings, the majority leader successfully moved to re-refer ACA 8 from the Appropriations Committee to the Elections Committee; the roll-call result for that motion was recorded as Ayes 47, Noes 18.

Members also debated suspensions of notice and file requirements to allow informational hearings and faster scheduling for ACA 8 and SB 280. Several waiver motions and unanimous-consent requests were made; where recorded on the roll, they passed by similar margins (examples: 48–18, 46–18, 49–18 on successive suspensions and notice waivers). Assemblymember Gallagher repeatedly argued that the waivers circumvented required public notice and the constitutionally mandated 72-hour requirement for certain changes; the chair repeatedly ruled his points \"not well taken.\" Gallagher and Assemblymember DeMaio urged higher thresholds in the floor debate but were unsuccessful in overturning the speaker's referrals.

Taken together, the floor exchanges show a multi-step process: (1) Speaker refers bills under chamber rules; (2) members raise constitutional and rule-based objections; (3) appeals to the body are taken and the speaker's rulings are sustained in successive roll calls; and (4) the chamber ultimately authorized the Elections Committee to notice ACA 8 and schedule hearings. The transcript records multiple roll-call tallies that reflect the chamber's divided votes on the proper procedural path, but not a final disposition on the substantive merits of SB 280 or ACA 8.

No final committee actions on the merits of SB 280 or ACA 8 are recorded in the floor transcript. The motions documented were procedural: referrals, appeals and suspensions of notice requirements to enable committee hearings and scheduling.","Multiple points of order, appeals and roll-call votes punctuated the Assembly's handling of SB 280 (Cervantes) and ACA 8 during the June 4 session. The speaker's referrals and subsequent motions drew repeated appeals that were sustained; a motion to re-refer ACA 8 to Elections ultimately passed while other re-referral efforts failed.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6503029,"Assembly adopts resolution recognizing California Native American Day, honors tribal leaders and students",1375,5491835,6867000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5596959-e77706cc63a09539ad963aebc7b9a8e0&start=5491&end=6867","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5596959-e77706cc63a09539ad963aebc7b9a8e0/thumbnail_5491835.jpg","/articles/6503029/California/Assembly-adopts-resolution-recognizing-California-Native-American-Day-honors-tribal-leaders-and-students","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6503029-d22623c19ec040b760c7b089b718b7da/orig.mp4?Expires=1773556879&Signature=gpAtvt0hjh66LAebQfJ~j935CoOrfwER5-AOZ08hV1zPZ0DINbrF-MEJGVCsqHr7VHf6hgm4OHAR6E~gbsObLh3FGjjSeHs7RDV~3oTJNe5v9Z8YffcdjDfl79fB-YDr7A4htMK1sNvHIXH54DSq~pbDg9ng0DtbdtxQCzSmJONn5DIMiRzet5uGpmyF18EahYwkqi1AvJJe15SYE-rofC4S8~VDv0S0Mgu~XshoFgk0~bpkYD~XcUrnaZZo-AOPVIkiJlI4eBQbN~2kHhsvrp7dgWimovgD3YaE84DEWrx6p-uOADT7JSM48aU6zJgyv2eKpbq7jdhnUHiso5B9xg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The California State Assembly adopted Assembly Concurrent Resolution 102 on June 4, 2025, recognizing California Native American Day and opening the chamber for a ceremony honoring tribal leaders, educators and high school students.

The resolution, presented by Assemblymember James Ramos as chair of the California Native American Legislative Caucus, drew multiple floor speeches and a ceremony featuring traditional songs and honorees from across the state. \"California is home to the most Native Americans than any other state in the nation,\" Ramos said in remarks before the vote, calling for truthful teaching of the state's history and listing recent legislative steps aimed at tribal partnerships and protections.

ACR 102 acknowledges the annual California Indian Cultural Awareness Conference and the observance of California Native American Day in September. Supporters highlighted recent state actions they said advance tribal co-governance, missing-and-murdered Indigenous persons initiatives, education reforms and repatriation of remains and cultural artifacts from public university systems.

Assemblymembers from multiple caucuses described the resolution as more than ceremonial. \"By recognizing California Native American Day, we do more than honor heritage. We affirm a commitment to visibility, to justice, and to the dignity of every life,\" Assemblymember Heather stated during debate. Speakers recalled historic injustices — including references to early California laws and the governor's 2019 apology — and noted recent policy changes such as the creation of a Feather Alert for missing Indigenous people and new co-management authority for the Natural Resources Agency.

After debate, Ramos requested the first roll be opened for coauthors; the clerk recorded 71 coauthors. The body adopted ACR 102 by voice vote. \"Ayes have it. The resolution is adopted,\" the clerk announced, and the chamber moved into the Native American Day ceremony, which included traditional songs, remarks about honorees and a reception scheduled for the evening.

Honorees recognized during the ceremony included Judge Abby Abinanti (Yurok Tribe), Councilwoman Catalina R. Chacon (Pechanga Band of Indians), the late Rosemary (Rose) Salgado (Serrano/Luiseno communities) and Chairman Frederick Quintin Beau Massetti (Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians), among others. The chamber also publicly recognized three Clovis Unified School District students who asserted their right to wear tribal regalia at graduation.

The Assembly set a reception for honorees later that day and directed members to printed biographies and program materials made available on members' desks. No fiscal action or regulatory change was enacted by adopting the resolution; the measure is a formal recognition and ceremonial observance adopted by the Assembly.

The ceremony and adoption took place on the Assembly floor and were followed by additional routine business.","The California Assembly adopted Assembly Concurrent Resolution 102 to recognize California Native American Day and held a floor ceremony honoring tribal leaders, educators and students. The resolution passed by voice vote after the measure gathered dozens of coauthors.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Assembly passes several concurrence bills and resolutions June 4, 2025

Assembly floor dispute over referrals: appeals sustain speaker and motions on SB 280/ACA 8 split the chamber

Assembly adopts resolution recognizing California Native American Day, honors tribal leaders and students