County Discusses Air Ambulance Contracts Amid Insurance Coverage Questions

In a recent meeting held on August 19, 2025, the Grayson County government discussed the future of air ambulance contracts and the supplemental insurance plan that the county provides for its employees. The conversation centered around whether the county should continue funding a $20 supplement for air ambulance memberships, given that many employees are already covered by their Blue Cross Blue Shield insurance.

The county currently pays approximately $3,000 annually for this supplemental insurance, which covers three air ambulance companies in the area. The discussion was prompted by questions regarding the necessity of this plan, especially since the existing insurance reportedly covers air ambulance services. However, some employees expressed concerns about potential out-of-pocket costs that could arise even with insurance coverage.

One speaker, a former first responder and long-time member of the Air Evac family, shared personal experiences highlighting the high costs associated with air ambulance services. He noted that while insurance may cover a portion of the expenses, it often does not cover the total cost, leaving individuals with significant bills. He emphasized that the membership program is not an insurance policy but rather a supplemental service that can alleviate financial burdens in emergencies.

The speaker also pointed out that the membership program has grown in popularity, with around 146 employees currently participating. He suggested that many members would be willing to continue paying the $20 supplement, as it provides peace of mind in case of emergencies, particularly for families with children involved in sports or other activities.

The discussion concluded with a general consensus among commissioners to support the continuation of the air ambulance membership program, recognizing its importance in ensuring timely medical transport for residents in critical situations. As the county evaluates its budgetary priorities, the decision on whether to maintain this supplemental coverage will be crucial for the well-being of its employees and their families.