Midvale Residents Oppose Property Tax Increases Amid Safety and Service Concerns

In the heart of Midvale, residents gathered at the city council meeting on August 19, 2025, to voice their concerns over proposed property tax increases. The atmosphere was charged with apprehension as citizens expressed their worries about how these changes would impact their daily lives and financial stability.

One resident, Doug Wright, articulated a common sentiment among attendees, stating, “I say no to all property taxes and certainly to an increase.” He highlighted the burden that rising taxes place on homeowners, arguing that they could push people out of their homes and hinder others from purchasing property. Wright's comments resonated with many, as he questioned the allocation of tax funds, suggesting that the city’s spending priorities were misaligned with the needs of its residents.

Concerns about public safety were also prevalent. A long-time Midvale resident shared his fears about unsafe driving conditions caused by curb parking, which he felt jeopardized his safety when exiting his driveway. He implored the council to ensure that the additional tax revenue would address such pressing local issues.

Lana Stewart echoed similar frustrations, pointing out that despite paying for streetlights, her neighborhood lacked adequate lighting. She also raised concerns about noise pollution from nearby State Street, emphasizing the need for better management to enhance the quality of life for residents.

As the meeting progressed, other attendees voiced their skepticism about the city’s financial decisions. Matt Bjornsson warned that once the tax increase was implemented, it could lead to further financial demands on residents. He urged the council to consider budget cuts instead of raising taxes, reflecting a broader concern about government spending.

The discussion also touched on the perceived lack of transparency in how tax dollars are spent. Diane Bjornson criticized the city’s budget practices, arguing that residents deserved clearer communication regarding expenditures and the rationale behind tax increases.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that the proposed tax increase had sparked a significant dialogue among Midvale residents. Many left the council chamber with lingering questions about the future of their community and the financial decisions that would shape it. The council's challenge now lies in addressing these concerns while balancing the city's budgetary needs.