[{"_1":2,"_82":-5,"_83":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":59,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":65,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},"mediaId",6588464,"mediaKeyId","5609420-1b682212ff6b201d3fb219e1324889fe","parentId",5609420,"title","Council member moves to lease 20 town‑square parking stalls north of Cafe Galleria amid debate over residential parking","audioSeconds",1678,"startMs",0,"endMs",1678000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5609420-1b682212ff6b201d3fb219e1324889fe&start=0&end=1678","thumbnailUrl","https://d352y6ypj4mjo3.cloudfront.net/AudioPlaceholder.png","articleUrl","/articles/6588464/Midway/Wasatch-County/Utah/Council-member-moves-to-lease-20-townsquare-parking-stalls-north-of-Cafe-Galleria-amid-debate-over-residential-parking","mediaUrl","author","Midway","date","2025-08-19T18:00:00Z","article","Councilmember Jeff moved to approve leasing 20 parking stalls around the town square north of Cafe Galleria and to prohibit leasing or creating parking south of the business, a proposal he described as a way to satisfy the property’s parking obligation without forcing structural change to the historic building.

The vote on Jeff’s amended motion was called after a second by Councilmember Karianne Lisonbee. The transcript records at least one councilmember saying “My vote is aye,” but does not include a complete roll-call tally or a formal recording of the final outcome.

Why it matters: the town square parcels mix long‑standing residential uses and newer commercial activity. Council discussion focused on how to meet current code parking requirements for businesses while avoiding the spread of diagonal or curbside parking in front of homes, preserving neighborhood character and access for agricultural uses nearby.

Council context and motion details

Jeff said the intent of his amendment was narrow: “we approve leasing 20 parking stalls around the town square, north of Cafe Galleria, and that we do not approve leasing or creating any parking south of the business.” He described the measure as tied to a particular property and said the city had already invested in creating some spaces to avoid forcing the business to tear down and redevelop the historic structure.

Other councilmembers and the mayor pressed for clarity about which spaces counted as the business’s on‑site requirement, how many stalls were already secured by private lease, and whether the city’s right of way was being converted to long‑term commercial parking. Council discussion established these points from the transcript evidence:

- Current code calculation: the property’s total requirement was described as 19 stalls under the city’s current code. Council discussion indicated the 19‑stall figure is the code requirement used for current compliance calculations.
- On‑site vs. leased: councilmembers stated that some of the 19 required stalls were being met on private property (nine stalls were described as being met “over in the post office parking lot”), leaving the city to provide the remaining stalls (described in the discussion as 10 stalls that the city would provide or lease).
- Lease geography limit: Jeff’s amendment, as clarified on the record, limited the lease to stalls north of Cafe Galleria and specified no leasing or creation of parking south of the business.

Substantive concerns and points of disagreement

Councilmembers repeatedly framed the issue as an interface problem: long‑standing residential uses sit adjacent to commercial zoning, and the conversion or operation of businesses in older buildings can push parking demand into residential frontages. Some members said that converting right of way into diagonal stalls directly in front of residences could set an undesirable precedent. Others said the leased stalls were a practical compromise to avoid requiring the business to demolish or substantially rebuild a historic structure to meet stricter on‑site parking standards.

Council members also discussed operational details the motion did not specify and asked staff to clarify them if the council moved forward:

- Exactly which curb spaces are counted toward the 19‑stall total and which are subject to a lease.
- Whether the city would remove or alter signage and cones placed when the city previously created on‑street stalls.
- How the arrangement would be limited to the specific parcel or considered a one‑off for historic structures.

Process and next steps recorded in the transcript

The council debated whether to continue the item to allow members who were not part of prior meetings to review the lease details. Multiple members recommended continuing the item so staff could present clear maps and counts. The transcript records a formal motion from Jeff, a second by Karianne Lisonbee, the mayor calling the vote, and at least one “aye” recorded; the full recorded tally and formal outcome are not included in the provided transcript.

Clarifying details captured from the discussion

- Required stalls under current code: 19 (described during council discussion).
- Private stalls already pledged: described as nine stalls provided at the post office parking lot; the city would provide the remaining stalls (described as about 10) through lease or on‑street stalls.
- Jeff’s amended motion: lease 20 stalls north of Cafe Galleria; do not lease or create parking south of the business (mover: Jeff; second: Karianne Lisonbee).

What the council did not decide (per the transcript)

The transcript does not include a full roll‑call or the final tally. The council discussed but did not resolve on the record: exact striping or signage changes, whether the leased spaces would set a precedent citywide, and how to formalize which curb stalls count toward a business’s on‑site requirement. Several members asked staff to return with clear site maps and a written clarification of which spaces are part of the lease.

Ending

Council members agreed the interface between commercial activity and long‑standing residential uses requires a precise, site‑specific approach and asked staff for clearer documentation. The transcript shows the council acted on an amended leasing motion (moved by Jeff and seconded by Karianne Lisonbee) and called a vote; the provided record does not include the complete vote result or subsequent ordinance or contract language.","mediaType","Audio","parentTitle","Midway City Council Regular Meeting - Council - 20250819 - Regular - Audio - Part 2","oneSentenceSummary","Councilmember Jeff moved to approve leasing 20 parking stalls north of Cafe Galleria to meet the property’s parking requirement and to prohibit leasing or creating parking south of the business; the council put the amended motion to a vote but the transcript does not record a full tally.","taxTitle","Midway, Wasatch County, Utah","taxId",68985,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":44,"_43":77,"_45":77,"_47":78,"_49":50,"_51":79,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":80,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":81,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},6588460,"Council hears Recyclops presentation on opt‑out curbside recycling; staff asked for cost and operational details",1669000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5609420-1b682212ff6b201d3fb219e1324889fe&start=1669&end=1669","/articles/6588460/Midway/Wasatch-County/Utah/Council-hears-Recyclops-presentation-on-optout-curbside-recycling-staff-asked-for-cost-and-operational-details","Midway City Council heard a presentation from Recyclops (Ryan Smith and company representatives) on options for citywide curbside recycling, including an opt‑out model intended to increase participation and an array of pricing tiers and add‑ons for weekly service or glass recycling.

Recyclops described an operational model that uses locally contracted drivers pulling logoed trailers or small vehicles rather than heavy garbage trucks, with mixed recycling collected in bags or small curbside bins and glass collected as a separate add‑on. Ryan Smith told the council that he sends Midway material to Salt Lake area material recovery facilities; he said Waste Management recently built a roughly $24,000,000 recycling facility in the region and that those facilities markedly reduce the share of recyclable material that ultimately lands in a landfill compared with the national average.

Key points from the presentation and council questions

- Participation model and rates: Recyclops said Midway currently has about an 18% opt‑in subscription rate. The company estimated an opt‑out model (where service is provided by default and households can opt out) typically yields roughly 75–80% participation in comparable communities.
- Pricing options discussed (city chooses the base program): examples presented included a base, every‑other‑week program at about $17 per month (no glass); a weekly program at about $23 per month (no glass) and roughly $25 per month with glass included. Individuals could also add weekly pickup or glass for an additional per‑household fee. Recyclops said the city could choose which level to standardize and allow residents to opt into add‑ons.
- Operational method: Recyclops described a bag or small bin approach for residential curbside collection, using local independent contractors rather than heavy collection fleets; flattened cardboard is handled separately and glass is collected only if a resident selects that add‑on.
- Contamination and recovery rates: Recyclops reported contamination rates in the 5–8% range in its operations and said Salt Lake facilities typically yield lower rates of discarded recyclables than the national average (the transcript cites the national average of material put in recycling that still ends up in landfill at 25%).
- Service reliability and past issues: several councilmembers raised prior reliability concerns with earlier contractors — missed collections, difficulty obtaining replacement bags, and inconsistent pickup — and asked how Recyclops would prevent recurrence. Recyclops said the company’s national metrics show a 99.5% on‑time completion rate and described internal improvements after a period of rapid expansion.
- Billing and administration: the council asked whether the city would bill residents or Recyclops would bill directly. Recyclops presented multiple models: the city could manage opt‑in/opt‑out lists and bill residents (which creates staff time, credit‑card fees and customer support burdens) or the company could bill residents directly under contract. Councilmembers asked staff to provide a budget estimate for any city billing, customer support or software needs.

No formal vote; council direction and next steps

The recycling discussion was presented as a workshop item; no motion was on the agenda and the transcript shows councilmembers asking clarifying questions, airing prior concerns, and asking staff to return with a cost analysis and implementation options. The mayor and several councilmembers indicated interest in pursuing further information; the council gave a general thumbs‑up to continue work on the idea and requested follow‑up on program costs, staffing impacts, procurement options and service guarantees.

Clarifying details captured from the discussion

- Current opt‑in subscription level in Midway: approximately 18% (Recyclops figure).
- Expected participation under opt‑out: Recyclops estimated roughly 75–80% participation in comparable communities.
- Sample pricing tiers from Recyclops materials: $17/month (every other week, base, no glass), $23/month (weekly, no glass), $25/month (weekly with glass); individual households could add weekly pickup or glass for additional fees.
- Operational equipment: pickup trucks with trailers or vans used for collection in Midway; smaller vehicles and trailers are designed to reduce emissions and road wear compared with heavy garbage trucks.
- Reported performance metrics from Recyclops: contamination ~5–8%; company reported a 99.5% on‑time successful completion rate nationally.

Ending

Councilmembers asked staff to return with a detailed financial and operational plan — including the cost to the city for billing and customer support, options for contractor oversight or direct billing by Recyclops, and contract language to protect service levels. The item was left for additional staff work and possible future action.","Representatives from Recyclops outlined a citywide curbside recycling proposal that would use an opt‑out model, tiered pricing and contractors for collection. Council members raised operational concerns (bags vs. bins, contractor reliability, billing and staff workload) and asked staff to return with cost impacts and procurement options.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Council member moves to lease 20 town‑square parking stalls north of Cafe Galleria amid debate over residential parking

Council hears Recyclops presentation on opt‑out curbside recycling; staff asked for cost and operational details