Homeowners Seek Setback Exemption for Vanderbilt Property Renovation

In a recent meeting of the Dallas Board of Adjustments, residents of 5451 Vanderbilt Avenue presented a compelling case for a variance concerning their home’s side yard setback. The couple, who have lived in their home since 2004, faced challenges during a remodeling project that led to unintended construction issues, prompting their appeal for an exemption from the city’s 10-foot setback requirement.

As they stood before the board, the homeowners explained that their property is unique, sharing a driveway with the neighboring house and having a pre-existing setback of only 9 feet. They argued that the construction changes made by their contractor, which included infilling a previously open area, were intended to enhance the home’s appearance and safety, particularly for their children. However, the contractor's failure to secure proper permits led to complications that necessitated their appearance before the board.

The couple highlighted that their request involves a mere 12 square feet of space, which they believe would not negatively impact the neighborhood. They noted that many homes on their street have similar or even smaller setbacks, and they have garnered support from 78% of their neighbors, who signed a petition in favor of their request.

Support for the homeowners also came from Sarah Jane Fiorello, a long-time resident of the area, who praised the aesthetic improvements made to the house and emphasized that the changes do not encroach on neighboring properties. She expressed confidence that the modifications blend seamlessly with the character of the neighborhood.

The conservation specialist present at the meeting echoed this sentiment, stating that the homeowners are not exceeding a nonconforming setback but rather maintaining it. The specialist confirmed that the changes would not adversely affect the property or the surrounding district.

As the meeting concluded, the board members were left to deliberate on the homeowners' request, weighing the implications of granting the variance against the backdrop of community support and the unique circumstances surrounding the property. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for similar requests in the future, highlighting the delicate balance between maintaining city regulations and accommodating the needs of residents.