Residents Oppose Masonic Cornerstone Proposal at Waller County Courthouse

In a recent Waller County Commissioners Court meeting, community members voiced strong opposition to the proposed installation of a Masonic cornerstone at the courthouse. The atmosphere was charged as residents took turns expressing their concerns, emphasizing the perceived conflict between the values of Freemasonry and their religious beliefs.

Jolene Reed, a local educator with 25 years of experience teaching in the county jail, was among the first to speak. She passionately argued against the cornerstone, describing Freemasonry as an organization rooted in deception. Reed highlighted her commitment to truth, stating, "We have to live in truth; otherwise, we're sunk." She urged the commissioners to consider the implications of supporting an organization she believes contradicts the teachings of Christianity.

Following Reed, another resident, identified as Shannon, echoed similar sentiments. She and her husband had reached out to local officials, requesting that the court vote against the Masonic cornerstone. Shannon characterized Freemasonry as a secretive organization that diverges from the foundational beliefs of the nation. "Although this organization has done many good works, there are many other organizations...none of which need to be honored with the structure on our courthouse," she stated, reinforcing the call for the court to respect the views of the community.

As the meeting progressed, the voices of concerned citizens painted a picture of a community grappling with the intersection of tradition, faith, and civic representation. The discussions reflected a broader concern about the values that should be celebrated in public spaces, with many residents advocating for a focus on religious principles over affiliations with organizations they view as secretive.

The commissioners now face the challenge of balancing these passionate opinions as they consider the future of the courthouse's symbolic representation. The outcome of this debate could have lasting implications for the community's identity and values, leaving residents eager to see how their voices will influence the decision-making process.