[{"_1":2,"_110":-5,"_111":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,86,98],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6790061,"mediaKeyId","5608973-283c8ef4d656a29611d147ddc800fbe4","parentId",5608973,"title","San Clemente council approves limited pilot allowing dogs on a stretch of beach","audioSeconds",3604,"startMs",5542890,"endMs",9147155,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5608973-283c8ef4d656a29611d147ddc800fbe4&start=5542&end=9147","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5608973-283c8ef4d656a29611d147ddc800fbe4/thumbnail_5542890.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6790061/San-Clemente-City/Orange-County/California/San-Clemente-council-approves-limited-pilot-allowing-dogs-on-a-stretch-of-beach","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6790061-7ef9bad52ea86f0cb5c146869673b907/orig.mp4?Expires=1773580529&Signature=bOlKbZ0rE10TU5Qkw1VXolCza4y0v0Peh2BqdSca3FWmDiTJSmpYUWtTJz~ziQh8HFBdTowPUqyIhTkHEm2oSoo32h9xWmjCBRbG6JZ~pfIGho1roZFcausot5ZlOR3ZMejDHYoq1N1hndJSgajJzEZhjsp5RV5ri10pauZ5bu2~bwZd-7DpENkrK4xVIVDu1dtSHSicMI0AQS3o6igOauWR~ecAi1dpdihUDj49UcMFrybzLz3lmvgxjJxAxtQyz7hM5FIl7GdiHsF7lsRrabqGkptAz83yeElmvUt1RvI2V8ShljxZw3Zur~KdWAnELu6FlH~ggmnqDocH-MMgKw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","San Clemente City","date","2025-08-20T21:25:28Z","article","The San Clemente City Council voted unanimously Aug. 19 to approve a six‑month pilot program that will permit dogs on a defined section of the city’s beaches under specified conditions.

Staff described a Parks and Recreation Commission recommendation for two possible locations and operating rules; the council accepted a friendly amendment to locate the pilot near South T Street (roughly the restroom area down to Tower 9) and to limit hours to early morning and evening. The approved parameters require dogs to be on a leash no longer than 6 feet, to be licensed, and for owners to pick up waste; the pilot will include signage and a sunset clause. The council specified mornings (6–8 a.m.) and evenings (after 6 p.m.) as allowed times and excluded high‑use weekend periods during the pilot.

Supporters argued a controlled pilot meets the needs of local dog owners who already use beaches early in the day; opponents said designated dog areas would harm water quality, family use and the reputation of key visitor beaches. Amanda Quintanilla, who reviewed regional water‑quality studies during public comment, warned that earlier tests found canine contributions to bacterial indicators and urged caution. “North Beach is not going to be—we already have problems with the drain there,” she said.

City Attorney and staff told the council that Coastal Commission involvement and CEQA review may be required because San Clemente does not yet have a certified Local Coastal Program; the motion directs staff to return with any required permitting steps and to implement signage and enforcement plans. Council members also instructed staff to ensure the pilot includes monitoring and a sunset so the program can be adjusted or ended before a summer season if results are negative.

The council framed the pilot as a time‑limited experiment that aims to reduce unsafe or illegal early‑morning activity and give residents a controlled access option; it does not create a permanent change until the council takes further action after evaluation and any required regulatory approvals.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City Council Meeting August 19, 2025 (Complete Meeting)","oneSentenceSummary","The San Clemente City Council approved a time‑limited pilot to allow dogs on a defined stretch near South T Street (Tower 9) with limited hours, leash and licensing rules, mandatory pickup and signage. The six‑month trial will start after any required Coastal Commission review; council passed the action unanimously.","taxTitle","San Clemente City, Orange County, California","taxId",4846,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6790046,"Council reports closed‑session approval to opt into Purdue/Slacker settlements",0,5433875,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5608973-283c8ef4d656a29611d147ddc800fbe4&start=5433&end=5433","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5608973-283c8ef4d656a29611d147ddc800fbe4/thumbnail_5433875.jpg","/articles/6790046/San-Clemente-City/Orange-County/California/Council-reports-closedsession-approval-to-opt-into-PurdueSlacker-settlements","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6790046-20492a7ea3af21f4192ed7593ccddbe3/orig.mp4?Expires=1773580529&Signature=QJNgsbkFot0y3ll1VwAR34xgBWPKwtpH2~kANJzApvUBkq0RD3SuUG5pkhOgDz-0imJKEC2CXr3QGeY7mcMd0A0stqrod5ecs7SELqaZsTfJ~6UNJb1Dd6fbHhZuO6KmqLF8ItYSVwEf7BoK-d8RzSeMqif2LvbwOZPrmMYfbMK8UYzgL~LjQquOL5spA1hwCii-sI4KMA-OLy0W~0hmd2VpM~hT7ofNngp2Q~HwZWGCo-iXO8kDFawEsSfnai~Ek4VpMnoUWxa-J3WZyRuu28xdfZtBukMoRIfVLe-D3pugFI~Hw697wIto3LUD9-Rq3PMOrgAQPz3ZmXMPsAKskg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The City Attorney reported that the City Council met in closed session earlier and on a 5–0 vote approved a settlement agreement to opt the city into the Purdue/Slacker family opioid settlement. The council authorized the city manager to execute necessary documents to implement the city’s participation, and directed staff when feasible to allocate the city’s designated share of settlement funds to the County of Orange.

The city attorney provided a public link for the settlement documentation and confirmed copies would be available in the city offices for public review. The action was reported out in open session with no additional public testimony at that time.","In closed session the council approved a 5–0 motion authorizing the city manager to opt the city into the Purdue/Slacker family settlement agreement and to execute necessary documents; staff noted designated settlement-share allocation to County of Orange when possible.",{"_33":87,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":88,"_41":89,"_43":90,"_45":91,"_47":92,"_49":93,"_51":94,"_53":95,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":96,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":97,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6790051,"San Clemente approves weed‑abatement contract, extends goat‑grazing pilot and backs hazard‑mitigation grant application",515,11217615,11733425,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5608973-283c8ef4d656a29611d147ddc800fbe4&start=11217&end=11733","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5608973-283c8ef4d656a29611d147ddc800fbe4/thumbnail_11217615.jpg","/articles/6790051/San-Clemente-City/Orange-County/California/San-Clemente-approves-weedabatement-contract-extends-goatgrazing-pilot-and-backs-hazardmitigation-grant-application","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6790051-d0f66db8bb3042b343b2ab282713d028/orig.mp4?Expires=1773580529&Signature=PRDH~A1Ix0qL5aXiO2TRy50XOFuWgnaGXKH2anur4~rr9mMh9FmmZ5~B3OxeN3u7qJxQlglh8RzG7QiXKyNQ2AG-72JvRXxL9c1Fz9CZnahMBSmhV7FumgL3w6VXrzWxRAiuxRtBKUPH87iieu~XEEEA2HLmCCLjVfc1iM57iCtM-npqG2F0~GBK1UAqyrOVlRgc3xOOXN4nbJQI8yq4-wNpocurG8Rg6R5PWHQshl8OzjtxSggy-n3zrZLfhfXVT3IluXnQCTt2S4luZaGU8QNwCMQDjFhScwLnym4xo3gtZUyIMKyrvide8Oym~e7DOIEd6Mw21MxXe3VRHZs58g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Clemente City Council adopted a package of wildfire‑prevention measures Aug. 19 that would expand weed abatement, continue and enlarge a goat‑grazing pilot, and position the city to apply for larger hazard‑mitigation grant funding.

Community Development staff summarized three elements: a short‑term extension of the Vista Hermosa goat‑grazing pilot with a requested supplemental appropriation (up to $100,000) to bridge implementation until Cal Fire grant outcomes are known; a Cal Fire Wildfire Prevention Grant application to treat selected public open‑space parcels; and a Hazard Mitigation Grant program application seeking $8.55 million with a proposed 25% match that staff intends to meet largely through in‑kind contributions (staff time, volunteer labor and partnership commitments) rather than a large direct general‑fund outlay.

The recommended expansion of the weed‑abatement contract with Ed Stewart & Associates (local firm with prior experience on similar work) would increase the contract to $256,060 to address additional defensible‑space buffers and city‑owned properties identified under updated fire hazard severity zone mapping.

Council members asked detailed procedural questions about scope, CEQA and biological constraints; staff said certain grant activities would require biological review and CEQA compliance and that the Cal Fire grant decision is expected in December. Several public speakers supported the measures and urged the council to maintain momentum; one speaker highlighted neighborhood insurance impacts where properties face rising fire‑risk premiums.

The council approved the staff recommendation (motions to adopt the cited resolutions passed 5–0), with an instruction to use grant and in‑kind match options to limit general‑fund exposure where feasible and to return to the council with implementation details as grant awards or additional approvals are needed.","The council adopted resolutions to expand the city's weed‑abatement contract (Ed Stewart & Associates), approved a short‑term extension and funding request for a goat‑grazing pilot, and authorized pursuit of a Hazard Mitigation Grant (approx. $8.55M project) with a 25% match option. Council adopted the related resolutions unanimously.",{"_33":99,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":100,"_41":101,"_43":102,"_45":103,"_47":104,"_49":105,"_51":106,"_53":107,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":108,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":109,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6790056,"Residents press San Clemente council for transparency over alleged damage to San Onofre fuel canisters",285,3294450,3579580,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5608973-283c8ef4d656a29611d147ddc800fbe4&start=3294&end=3579","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5608973-283c8ef4d656a29611d147ddc800fbe4/thumbnail_3294450.jpg","/articles/6790056/San-Clemente-City/Orange-County/California/Residents-press-San-Clemente-council-for-transparency-over-alleged-damage-to-San-Onofre-fuel-canisters","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6790056-7c7fbde1bdeb0d76f94b9fd0ac04370a/orig.mp4?Expires=1773580529&Signature=eL~e8QAHzQXR51zq4r2Jm7s2IACeXiOdPFmWKOO9crZZRIC6dXOzBTgZrMWsfl-TS~WkZiGAZ4kqmZGsuf0DFE8F9mCQHNLva2gaF67RxRFCYDHMiyONK3Z-NZLB705DCBCaHFW37WCPEXqOgGKRvpUQzXMZkSVXkbDCiDDDxQzXYN~zOQMgvVonvRnnv-1D5AT4yR5uPHP5WIn3tCK8MmpvgQvdXyfrNHkl3LEZ6tM-VwtULIDDVjxV93RP3VE8wUBCuyGamBBOTCSUirXYRbbKHBPmbkZ7KAodIcs9vJMcFD0K4qR0ET4BZc~CxHWUZK8uSz68JWaylNzoVZ5uiQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Multiple San Clemente residents used the public‑comment period Aug. 19 to press the City Council to demand greater transparency and third‑party review of dry‑storage canister inspections at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

Speakers including Gary Hedrick, Jerry Collimer and Ed Schlegel presented photos and argued that some canisters—most heavily cited was canister number 72—showed corrosion, lengthwise gouges and signs consistent with stress‑corrosion cracking. Several presenters said industry and media statements minimizing those images are insufficient and asked the council to request that Southern California Edison release all inspection photos for independent review by the California Coastal Commission or other outside experts.

\"These inspection photos show clear evidence of corrosion and gouging on canister number 72,\" one speaker said while showing slides. Another speaker argued that U.S. canister wall thickness is substantially less than designs used abroad and therefore more vulnerable.

Councilmembers acknowledged the seriousness of speakers’ concerns and asked staff about possible actions the city can take, including requesting Coastal Commission involvement. City staff and council also noted limits to local authority over nuclear‑regulatory matters and the need to coordinate with state and federal agencies; a city attorney previously advised that the council could reaffirm prior resolutions and seek regional or legislative support.

Speakers urged the council to consider a resolution amplifying community concerns and to work with regional partners to press for permanent removal or relocation of the spent fuel. Council agreed to revisit the issue, and the mayor noted earlier council action in support of steps to address the facility.

The public comments were extensive and detailed, with several scientific and historical claims raised; staff and council did not endorse technical conclusions from those presentations but committed to reviewing possible municipal actions.","Dozens of residents urged the city to press Southern California Edison and the Coastal Commission for full access to visual inspection photos and third‑party reviews after they presented images and cited apparent corrosion and gouging on canister #72 at the San Onofre independent spent fuel storage installation.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

San Clemente council approves limited pilot allowing dogs on a stretch of beach

Council reports closed‑session approval to opt into Purdue/Slacker settlements

San Clemente approves weed‑abatement contract, extends goat‑grazing pilot and backs hazard‑mitigation grant application

Residents press San Clemente council for transparency over alleged damage to San Onofre fuel canisters