[{"_1":2,"_112":-5,"_113":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6585498,"mediaKeyId","5611544-75f13868978d024ae7dd1390495a0772","parentId",5611544,"title","Votes at a glance: motions presented to Smithville R‑II Board (vote outcomes not specified in transcript)","audioSeconds",4135,"startMs",69000,"endMs",4204000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5611544-75f13868978d024ae7dd1390495a0772&start=69&end=4204","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5611544-75f13868978d024ae7dd1390495a0772/thumbnail_69000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6585498/Missouri/Votes-at-a-glance-motions-presented-to-Smithville-RII-Board-vote-outcomes-not-specified-in-transcript","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6585498-108e2358435bc56dc016b5ffe77db394/orig.mp4?Expires=1773584187&Signature=LeNJaBON9B6A~-bo0FkObq1~5zafktRzXigidHdFbSj2cjNv9t2hXchXMkjIqAfhbGl3YdnVfDctVSOudBtUGOHK897ANyRvnElZvuTk5bndVIaPiBSFXSqtOc6OxVUxcZerJqtNG2-F3cTJWfhLMPW6vBSfYIhIiYTWY7BnZjhd6Om~gxUy~MAjI3KlzddprOQ3ijfohx8YIpbwdvRXI7I76hYYN4RoB40FMnig3V9mXCI6EMiQwIA75Js3koy-8WIajeX6uVysyzWqffsnI0dfIxwM0QtVeDnXls1ZGPF~WAO-WJm7fLdGMjPYCj2~iWEI31bMp-FR-If-9fSM7g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Smithville School District","date","2025-08-21T01:32:50.567Z","article","The transcript of the Smithville R‑II Board meeting records the following motions and seconds. The meeting transcript as provided records motions, seconds and discussion for these items but does not provide explicit roll‑call vote tallies or final outcomes for each motion; where the transcript lacks an explicit result, that is noted below.

1) Consent agenda (minutes, bills for payment, MOUs, supplemental pay schedule, personnel report).
- Motion: “approve the consent agenda as presented.”
- Mover/second: motion and second recorded.
- Outcome: vote not specified in transcript.

2) COP and lease purchase agreement for Navitas projects.
- Motion: “approve the COP and lease purchase agreement for Navitas projects.”
- Mover: board member (moved); Second: recorded.
- Outcome: vote not specified in transcript.

3) Newkirk Novak agreement, Amendment 1 (AIA construction document addendum).
- Motion: “approve the Newkirk Novak agreement amendment 1 as presented.”
- Mover/second: motion and second recorded; discussion clarified the amendment formalizes terms and does not change the guaranteed‑maximum price. The presenter said they anticipate coming in under the referenced amount.
- Outcome: vote not specified in transcript.

4) MSBA policy updates (2025b) — second of three readings.
- Motion: “approve MSBA 2025b policy updates for the second of three readings.”
- Mover/second: motion and second recorded.
- Outcome: vote not specified in transcript.

5) 2025–26 property insurance renewal (property and casualty).
- Motion: “approve the 2025–26 property insurance renewal as presented.”
- Mover/second: motion and second recorded; substantive discussion followed about broker RFQs and market solicitation practices. At least one trustee stated they would vote no because a broader broker RFQ was not conducted as earlier discussed.
- Outcome: vote not specified in transcript.

6) MSBA policy (DFI2) setting tuition for district programs.
- Motion: “approve MSBA policy DFI2 setting the tuition for district programs as presented.”
- Mover/second: motion and second recorded.
- Outcome: vote not specified in transcript.

7) Policy JFCD, student use of personal communication devices (first/only reading noted in transcript).
- Motion: “approve policy JFCD, student use of personal communication devices as presented.”
- Mover/second: motion and second recorded.
- Outcome: vote not specified in transcript.

8) MSBA 2025c policy updates (first of three readings).
- Motion: “approve MSBA 2025c policy updates for the first of three readings as presented.”
- Mover/second: motion and second recorded.
- Outcome: vote not specified in transcript.

9) Board of education calendar/dates (discussion/action placeholder).
- Motion/Action: discussion and calendar presented; action status not specified.

Note on methodology: The transcript contained formal motion and second language multiple times and recorded extended discussion; however, explicit roll‑call vote tallies or definitive 'approved/failed' outcomes were not included in the provided transcript excerpts. Where the transcript continued to subsequent agenda items after a request to vote, that usually indicates the board proceeded, but the official outcome should be confirmed against the district’s posted minutes or recorded voting record.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Smithville School District Board of Education Meeting - Wednesday, August 20, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The meeting transcript lists multiple motions and motions received seconds; explicit vote tallies or final outcomes are not recorded in the provided transcript excerpts.","taxTitle","SMITHVILLE R-II, School Districts, Missouri","taxId",66947,"location","Missouri","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6585503,"Smithville R‑II board debates property‑insurance renewal; some trustees press for wider broker RFQ",1245,2465000,3710000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5611544-75f13868978d024ae7dd1390495a0772&start=2465&end=3710","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5611544-75f13868978d024ae7dd1390495a0772/thumbnail_2465000.jpg","/articles/6585503/Missouri/Smithville-RII-board-debates-propertyinsurance-renewal-some-trustees-press-for-wider-broker-RFQ","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6585503-ec5f0569fba6e3f23478a331300158b7/orig.mp4?Expires=1773584187&Signature=QdSMmgt1x7E8zCWGis4hpedvdRYxUIZ7cnhvlafeFcCOdYgqc3EDIYPXX7DLX38gEkeI98Z-h0Y1dcQeqatmulyT7IJUibUymKStlrewVfdexNVshKU-IU97nXxFFGDeZ7STj9FelTi9MmJy6cnrpJLOaSE0fV8WGb6Nr2lab0V9MEilE4LHy0UjWKhYcY1ao3EeOe1Q6nnlP8Q5dsCo~vLeeQPUa~-JC3dLXgXQU8fm0xLRsyV7RxJnVtotWEoIYuHy~CAuLBD~jzJXSz7web6nN~Yb2dp-58ru~MsJWP~j-FYWKmE4NB3S-HmeJDL4FFtVUczyitGx1H2Gy5AR9A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Trustees at the Smithville R‑II Board of Education debated the district’s proposed 2025–26 property‑insurance renewal, focusing on whether administration met earlier commitments to solicit broker proposals beyond the current broker.

One board member said the administration had previously told the board it would seek broader bids and criticized the decision to renew without a new RFQ. “It’s our job for the taxpayers’ money. We need to go out and ask for an RFQ,” the board member said during discussion.

Administration responded that it had asked the broker (Denali) to solicit multiple insurer responses and that several insurers provided quotes. An administrator acknowledged the RFQ for a different insurance line (workers’ compensation) is being prepared and accepted responsibility for not prioritizing a separate broker RFQ earlier. “I did not run out of time. Did I make it a high enough priority, so I’ll certainly own that,” the administrator said.

The superintendent and other administrators described a seven‑year trend chart included as a late addition to the board packet and said property coverage has driven much of the recent premium increases. A district official cited a representative premium metric (referred to in discussion as “17.4¢”) and said the administration asked brokers to beat that rate where possible. The administration also said they were comfortable the renewal was favorable compared with market alternatives that returned higher estimates.

Trustees pressed whether a change of brokerage would yield access to different insurer markets; administration said that different brokers can have different market access and that the district will pursue a broader broker solicitation ahead of the next renewal cycle. One trustee said they would vote against the renewal because the promised broker RFQ had not occurred.

Why it matters: Property insurance cost and broker selection affect the district’s operating costs and risk management; premiums and deductibles noted in the discussion are material to the district budget.

Board follow‑ups: Administration said it will run a broader market process for the next renewal cycle (beginning in May for future cycles) and will include a workers’‑comp RFQ currently in preparation. Administrators offered to provide board members with the seven‑year trend and insurer response details on request.","Board members questioned administration’s approach to renewing the district’s 2025–26 property insurance, with some trustees saying administration had promised a broader broker solicitation. Administration said multiple insurer quotes were sought but acknowledged it did not run a separate RFQ to change brokers this round.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6585508,"Smithville R‑II board hears bond‑project update: demolition to begin in October, MEP work in September",419,1781000,2200000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5611544-75f13868978d024ae7dd1390495a0772&start=1781&end=2200","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5611544-75f13868978d024ae7dd1390495a0772/thumbnail_1781000.jpg","/articles/6585508/Missouri/Smithville-RII-board-hears-bondproject-update-demolition-to-begin-in-October-MEP-work-in-September","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6585508-84eeeace641aa197271f4a740d9abdad/orig.mp4?Expires=1773584187&Signature=k60YRf338ovnwnVyj3k5KDKKtq0UH3Wymk-iuWcKFHNgpWadYDaALxiHPQBfY~cZDo7Cee-xAsEQmzHXnRpKPdgvFLnKC4yxMLsXJEVrt8J7czkT8nNUjxJDQSoMbx8moNNtJZKcUt8qwzxxRD5UhNI3sZfpZ58Nzj8BexGTliY8PyZplTCMkTM2QsFWaOB4XB4Asf3yPkRcAwd-EGG5gEN3X8Rl39PhU1a02lm5EVVXCchuLjNVJ8NDyJ3S-uwoelmg6JV3qulzdJLdQ7fQ8Je3e0ITkx1OAslZGMuTkDrbZBwj6AVQdJAvsc908kHvQpS23hy3EbYTHx9RkNthNw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","District staff and the Navitas project team told the Smithville R‑II Board of Education that bond projects are progressing and that demolition work at the high school is scheduled to begin in October after mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP) rerouting in September.

A bond-project representative described completed and near‑completed items: new parking‑lot lighting, playgrounds (Eagle Heights complete, Horizon in final stages), turf orders for elementary sites, and multiple HVAC units installed (six of seven units reported installed; one remaining unit requires crane coordination). “They have optical eyes on top of them. So when the sun sets to a certain level, the lights come on,” the representative said about the new lot lighting.

The representative said package 0 (enabling work) is wrapping up, with a temporary gym entry and fencing in place; temporary doors have been delayed by supply logistics. When demolition begins in October, site fencing will extend along the front sidewalk. The district plans to present the next phase of enabling work for board approval at an upcoming meeting to allow mobilization in September.

Renderings shown to the board depict an open high‑school foyer, a rebuilt media center and a combined concessions/merchandise area; the presenter cautioned these were architect renderings and not final materials. Planned work includes a demo and rebuild of the media center, relocation/refurbishing of memorabilia (the school bell and Warriorhead donated by the Class of 1969), and an agricultural/Project Lead The Way space that remains in design.

On athletic facilities, the design team met with coaches to refine layouts for softball and baseball complexes and concessions; a geotechnical survey of soils returned preliminary positive results, the presenter said. Playground turf had been ordered and staff anticipated a September 12 completion date for elementary playground projects.

Why it matters: The high‑school demolition and enabling work will affect school circulation, access and the timing of construction activities during the school year. The board will be asked to approve the next package before mobilization.

Board follow‑ups: Administration said it will bring package 1 (demolition and steel procurement) for approval after enabling work is completed and will present a five‑week plan for MEP rerouting ahead of demolition.","District staff and the Navitas project team updated the board on bond-funded work at the high school and elementary campuses, including completed playgrounds, ordered turf, HVAC installations (6 of 7 units in place), and a phased demolition plan beginning in October.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6585515,"Smithville R‑II principals report smooth start to 2025–26 school year; enrollment growth noted",715,380000,1095000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5611544-75f13868978d024ae7dd1390495a0772&start=380&end=1095","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5611544-75f13868978d024ae7dd1390495a0772/thumbnail_380000.jpg","/articles/6585515/Missouri/Smithville-RII-principals-report-smooth-start-to-202526-school-year-enrollment-growth-noted","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6585515-9f5fe88edbdd23429cde19e6487eab15/orig.mp4?Expires=1773584187&Signature=il89CMlS95Au7ZKg0t7qaYKoyOTFlJET6VdAkknX78CMItXj~SjUk2stuySiy3HwHSS9YNmkgZgzu38-6DTIM4JVYTvsoXMCQoNpd6fqUcc8frlDc5fVB8ICAqc-JnBTrUpAhQ~y3nbiAjVmttbwPT8xMFF2MW3axi3GQBgGlk5bMTPrfdQkzM~zsEsB~TiHnALrsfPEnTyaYBfDBiaPC-yx1tUH754jZWHDCPKHMfqMlEljHyHRYunsPSWzqdwkj5yXqXR8VhCTNcykk7-DHzxul~~r~TxWEAKUxvFTEBUJwNhh4k~5DdPr6ZPgAAGcjA2FlsXQagZG0JlTt1oBfg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Smithville R‑II school principals told the Board of Education that the first two days of the 2025–26 school year were successful, with few operational problems and signs of enrollment growth.

The district’s high school principal, Scott Moore, said construction has been the dominant theme in the building but that staff and students have adapted. “We’re in a place of wonder together,” Moore said, noting that buses were off campus within 15 to 20 minutes during the first day’s dismissal and that fall activities and advanced-course enrollment appear to be strong.

Denise (no last name provided), speaking on behalf of Horizon Elementary, told the board the building had a very positive energy, and she reported that Horizon enrolled 59 students who had not previously attended the school. “They’re really looking forward to the turf playground,” she said.

A middle-school anecdote shared by a staff member highlighted student adjustment to the building: a seventh‑grade student who initially tried to “strut” through hallways became visibly lost until a staff member offered help. The story was offered as an example of the balance of confidence and uncertainty common in early middle‑school transitions.

Maple Elementary’s principal described a calmer second year in the role, praising teacher work over the summer and a positive open‑house response. Eagle Heights’ principal outlined building revitalizations — repainting, lounge improvements and a smoother transportation/dismissal process — and thanked maintenance and custodial staff for summer work across the district.

Administrators also pointed to instructional changes. One principal said the district began a new ELA resource and expects that the curriculum will boost reading comprehension, vocabulary and morphology instruction.

Why it matters: Early operational success reduces disruption to students and families; enrollment increases affect state funding calculations and staffing decisions that the board monitors going into the fall.

Board follow‑ups: The superintendent invited the principals to approach the dais after their remarks for a photo; administrators said they will continue to monitor enrollment and report counts on the state’s September count date.","District principals told the Smithville R‑II Board of Education that the first two days of the 2025–26 school year went smoothly, with transportation running on time and elementary enrollment increases. Horizon reported 59 new students; administrators cited positive staff energy and new instructional resources.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: motions presented to Smithville R‑II Board (vote outcomes not specified in transcript)

Smithville R‑II board debates property‑insurance renewal; some trustees press for wider broker RFQ

Smithville R‑II board hears bond‑project update: demolition to begin in October, MEP work in September

Smithville R‑II principals report smooth start to 2025–26 school year; enrollment growth noted