Historic Seawall Project Advances with Concrete Material Decision

The St. Augustine Historic Architectural Review Board (HARB) convened on August 21, 2025, to discuss significant updates regarding the seawall project and other architectural elements in the historic district. The meeting focused on the materials and design choices for the seawall, as well as considerations for lighting fixtures and fencing aesthetics.

The discussion began with inquiries about the reuse of materials from the existing north and south walls of the seawall. Board members highlighted the extensive deliberations that had taken place over the past year and a half regarding the appropriate materials, particularly the challenges associated with coquina stone, which is historically significant but not ideal for construction due to its softness. It was noted that the north section of the seawall has been constructed to resemble coquina using concrete, which has proven to be a more durable option.

The board emphasized that while the north and south walls are historic, the center wall is the most prominent and will utilize a different, more durable material to avoid confusion with the surrounding structures. The decision to use granite for the secondary walls was made to ensure they do not detract from the center seawall's visibility and to enhance longevity.

Further discussions addressed the lighting fixtures planned for the fee booth area. A board member suggested opting for higher-quality fixtures that can withstand the salt air environment, as the current options may require frequent maintenance. The board acknowledged this recommendation and agreed to reassess the lighting choices to ensure durability.

Additionally, the aesthetics of a new black fence were discussed, with concerns raised about its stark contrast against the building's lighter colors. Suggestions were made to consider a bronze or brown finish for the fence to create a more harmonious appearance with the surrounding architecture.

As the meeting progressed, the board expressed overall satisfaction with the project, recognizing its potential to enhance the historic district. A motion was made to approve the project without conditions, although members noted the importance of incorporating wood shingles into the design, reflecting the board's ongoing advocacy for traditional materials in the city.

In conclusion, the HARB meeting underscored the careful consideration of materials and design in preserving St. Augustine's historic character while adapting to modern needs. The board's commitment to maintaining the integrity of the historic district was evident throughout the discussions, with plans for further evaluations of specific project elements before final approvals.