[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},"mediaId",6191817,"mediaKeyId","4413485-a246dfcc4f6152424f6ee15188311dee","parentId",4413485,"title","Layton reports substantial completion of St. Petersburg sidewalk project after extensive root removal","audioSeconds",379,"startMs",4681000,"endMs",5060000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=4413485-a246dfcc4f6152424f6ee15188311dee&start=4681&end=5060","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/4413485-a246dfcc4f6152424f6ee15188311dee/thumbnail_4681000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6191817/Utah/Layton-reports-substantial-completion-of-St-Petersburg-sidewalk-project-after-extensive-root-removal","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6191817-af92423d137df60f80d8afd9835fd699/orig.mp4?Expires=1771086028&Signature=B-M3JSMMn4FxrtScUo9Tfp-I3GqDMTnh07fkt~mnc24cFhUZ7Q3YStYSEqVKwGSpcq1W9LFNHAAMHi4TY7MmVvEXk645rSwwBY1fYhvBKccTMcx2I4cgXfQ3b3z3R22m18w9yV3EL5Ljr77SKa2TwrFxktkyLdI9FPUjOLg~8dtuvnYwDmlEY89bDCgiUre0WZdZq9-1bHfnVGfqVPs1VKDCAEBV-r0GZvyaLnGDmzUHAoPnv5fj8JjIIJMIvsuDPUe86QSbR9Xc8OT44qzfAylk7NsXGZzn5Sq9GiaP-uDWTVMMPJ13ZNs0~zqgCzdsgUtL602KJ0ubhe9sh0GXTQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-06-20T14:40:06Z","article","Public works staff reported the St. Petersburg Drive sidewalk replacement project is substantially complete at the June 19 meeting, but said the extent of underground tree roots and related utility conflicts increased the scope beyond original estimates.

Staff described the work: crews removed damaged sidewalks, excised large tree roots that had lifted concrete and pinched irrigation and conduit lines, replaced 5,633 feet of sidewalk (more than initially estimated), replaced and repaired numerous ADA ramps and removed about 206 trees where roots had compromised walkways and utilities. Project photos showed root masses wrapped around sprinkler pipes and conduit and extensive park‑strip excavation in several yards.

Contractors are finishing punch‑list items and staff said about 70 percent of property owners had agreed to the standard payment arrangements (the city had offered a 50‑percent match on certain items and payment extensions in some cases). Roughly 30 percent of property owners had not responded; staff proposed sending reminders and reconvening the item at a future meeting for direction if owners do not settle.

Public‑works staff and council members discussed the timeline for collecting assessments and whether to proceed with the notices currently scheduled; staff recommended consistent treatment across property owners and asked the council to direct when to start the formal collection process for those who have not responded. The council asked staff to return at a future meeting with a recommended plan for closing the project and handling delinquent assessment notices. No final action was taken at the June 19 meeting beyond the status report.

Staff said the project’s larger-than-expected scope was driven by multiple mature trees whose roots had damaged sidewalks and buried utilities; the extra work increased the amount of sidewalk replaced compared with initial estimates but resulted in more durable repairs and restored ADA access for affected blocks.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Layton City Council Meeting June 19, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Public works told the council the multiweek sidewalk project repairing sidewalks lifted by tree roots is substantially complete; crews removed more concrete than expected, replaced hundreds of ADA ramps and removed 206 hazardous trees, and staff will follow up with property owners about assessment payments.","taxTitle","Layton City Council, Layton, Davis County, Utah","taxId",23419,"location","Utah","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6191822,"Layton Fire to issue RFP for EMS provider after state licensing changes; city seeks to remain provider",446,3179000,3625000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=4413485-a246dfcc4f6152424f6ee15188311dee&start=3179&end=3625","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/4413485-a246dfcc4f6152424f6ee15188311dee/thumbnail_3179000.jpg","/articles/6191822/Utah/Layton-Fire-to-issue-RFP-for-EMS-provider-after-state-licensing-changes-city-seeks-to-remain-provider","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6191822-92ef3ff44d95479fc962a3a8eaa13b35/orig.mp4?Expires=1771086028&Signature=ftmtAnhSGQslTPX8snrAQy9t-4wPhEkKH6IOgHRT793PVRRMnFErRMtoacnLlzd8ekee~ybBrLw1qQsBEF-CvejdlPBn~3btZNaKkARxgdebpvxcu4KTcJ9r3mNrVhlzWY14VlrzBqTJzvvblJjM6U5zeIG6c1HifpB6w-KidSKwiojdxHA2PvZJ1y2i0p7a4KJZtn3V3xhGTitbUZVALDWDZBlvgVpH-5vJcBBxV2pntZMWKL3tRv8f7YHq5BO5VRuL8XbnvadSFLJLKOc~z87oMeyzu3ffWTiYYzg8TuRjsv9K2sj3cUNLO-MGmwmnkMpy3YsMJ0m~9seC3~I1ww__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Layton City Fire briefed the council on June 19 about a statewide revamp of ambulance licensing and relicensing under Senate Bill 215 and related rule changes, explaining a short compliance timeline and staff plans to issue a required request for proposals (RFP).

Assistant Chief Scott Mahl and fire staff told the council that SB 215 followed a legislative audit and reorganized how ambulance services and interfacility transports are licensed. Staff said the state’s rules were not finalized at the time of the meeting (rules expected in October), but the city’s current ambulance license expires July 31; the state issued a checklist to help agencies comply. Chief staff explained the new law gives the governing body the ability to designate its EMS provider for both 9‑1‑1 response and interfacility transport, and it requires a formal procurement process in many cases.

Fire staff described Layton’s current operational model: five ambulances staffed 24/7 as minimum staffing, clinical capability (about 84 licensed paramedics/advanced EMTs), physician medical‑director oversight, rapid response performance (staff reported 92 percent compliance with the 5‑minute, 20‑second standard), and in‑house ambulance billing that collects roughly 96 percent of collectible revenue. They outlined the department’s revenue mix, noting an EMS enterprise fund supports a portion of fire staffing and that interfacility transports (about 2,059 in 2024) are billed to patients rather than hospitals.

Staff told the council they will post an RFP the following day and keep it open for 10 days as required by statute; if respondents propose alternative service models, the city must evaluate them. Staff indicated they will seek a letter of intent from the council to state Layton Fire Department’s desire to continue as the municipal EMS provider, and they warned that contracting EMS to an outside for‑profit provider can reduce local control over response quality and integration with fire operations.

Council members asked practical questions about dispatch, radio integration, response times and how a contractor would operate from city fire stations. Staff said any outside provider would need to be colocated at or post near fire stations to meet response-performance expectations. No formal action was taken; staff asked the council to authorize the procurement process and to provide a future letter of intent once proposals are received and evaluated.","Following statewide legislative changes to ambulance licensing, Layton Fire briefed the council on Senate Bill 215 impacts, said it will issue a 10‑day RFP as required, and requested council support to remain the city’s EMS 9‑1‑1 and interfacility transport provider.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6191826,"Layton staff outlines off‑leash options; council hears trade‑offs and suggests trial corridor",2015,2538000,4553000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=4413485-a246dfcc4f6152424f6ee15188311dee&start=2538&end=4553","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/4413485-a246dfcc4f6152424f6ee15188311dee/thumbnail_2538000.jpg","/articles/6191826/Utah/Layton-staff-outlines-offleash-options-council-hears-tradeoffs-and-suggests-trial-corridor","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6191826-b9dba524c6632fd76f751b30d9edca76/orig.mp4?Expires=1771086028&Signature=J3Skl7yRxV1bkyER1ClI9Cpnh2ApIigBK~R77~iuWm3382pQnLqh9DrC10tJmP3F9OcoBa5mln9AUhES7VQWoYGnf2X0ZGgh72BtYyrhnVyGSDCwcMvu0yo-oabUvjaHEBGgkIvXqaVg3F20NbB7dguztfF4hU-0Nkh8o6R4AMqER2~Dvi61PUOD9~yy7MzMiYAXU7oraFKQZV7etqlqeacRtR8BdqSeexXv36Fsx7oPQ-lbS4g9mBf1t8QZbepqYWRXJnUmHKoscNmoFZMtMjbNW8klsY0pmWsvi6OD~ATqqSMFKcD~pXx0wxbAHMBkrL~ppXjvtFhowLYltpR7ZQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Parks staff presented a study of options for allowing dogs in Layton parks on June 19, describing four models — the current on‑leash policy, fenced off‑leash dog parks, shared‑use off‑leash windows in existing parks, and off‑leash trail corridor areas — and laying out capital and ongoing maintenance costs and operational challenges for each.

Staff said Layton has permitted dogs on leash since a 2016 ordinance and already provides signage, bag stations and routine maintenance in neighborhood parks. The study noted that a fenced off‑leash dog park typically requires a larger upfront capital investment (staff estimated up to about $1 million for a full facility with parking and restrooms) and higher annual maintenance ($~12,500 per acre annually), plus recurring surfacing repairs and high concentration of use that can increase noise and conflicts.

A shared‑use approach (hours or days when an underused part of an improved park is open off‑leash) has lower capital cost but moderate operational costs and higher public-education needs. An off‑leash trail corridor model — allowing dogs off‑leash on specified trails or trail segments — carries medium capital cost and relatively low operational cost (staff estimated about $5,560 per acre annually) but raises risks to native vegetation, conflicts with cyclists and mobility‑impaired trail users, and public perception challenges.

Staff outlined two candidate corridors that could serve as a pilot: the Bamberger Trail (existing ~0.6‑mile segment, roughly 7 acres) and the East Ridge Nature Park trail system (16 acres, with parking and restrooms nearly completed as part of planned development). Presenters said average drive time from within Layton to existing off‑leash facilities in neighboring cities is about 16 minutes, but staff emphasized Layton’s larger geography and higher demand could justify a local option.

Council members and several public commenters urged the city to create a local dog park. Speakers from the audience described neighborhood nuisance from dogs at school fields and the community-building benefits of dog parks; they urged the council not to rely on smaller neighboring cities. Council discussion favored a cautious, lower‑cost approach: staff recommended a trail‑corridor pilot to test demand and impacts before committing to a full fenced park. Staff also suggested the city could try a 12‑month trial period on a selected trail corridor and monitor maintenance and conflict metrics before deciding on larger capital investment.

No ordinance or vote was taken; staff said they will return with more detailed cost estimates, operational plans and possible trial period parameters if council wants to proceed.","Parks staff presented a multi-option study for allowing dogs in city parks — on-leash citywide, off-leash fenced parks, shared-use off-leash hours or off-leash trail corridors — and recommended a cautious approach with potential pilot testing on trail corridors rather than building expensive fenced dog parks.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6191831,"Layton victim advocates warn federal VOCA cuts will shrink housing assistance",220,1566000,1786000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=4413485-a246dfcc4f6152424f6ee15188311dee&start=1566&end=1786","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/4413485-a246dfcc4f6152424f6ee15188311dee/thumbnail_1566000.jpg","/articles/6191831/Utah/Layton-victim-advocates-warn-federal-VOCA-cuts-will-shrink-housing-assistance","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6191831-3ece7a805c6050a3f9bfdba2143abfd2/orig.mp4?Expires=1771086028&Signature=KfMHlFFjwgLS8GKz-RqI26rKonRCRhmuBlyY47tdzJsMHZVGGJ1jDKG16lw8lXQtq2wkk2R0Vnswe2DaWI~g8z~~qdphB1YkYsVpUgc3GCwIoKOoZxARagqkF4c2iMS5C78b6b8Rgpo5-AGqtNScr2knbpsaJt4d5O9szWfDMUy1hY3PnJ21~v6U2sfKC2J0JasZgP8P03SCFO76baUlB255zyiHSYl0BQblu7oe3wJK9AXGP7wdMABLEmvjWW3X0q7q3YVeh7OMnNY5fY8qith~c-xjpnyzt1HuEjOjtsQC20HbEU9ErZbz8SyA~wvpKb36ELJgKfEDYRliSsMRGQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Layton City’s victim advocates told the council on June 19 that federal cuts to VOCA (Victims of Crime Act) funding will substantially reduce housing assistance available to local victims and force a programmatic shift toward short-term emergency support.

Chrislyn (identified in the presentation as a victim advocate) and Kelly (housing advocate) detailed the 2024–25 victim-services caseload and the city’s VOCA-funded housing program. They said the program helped dozens of households with relocation, safety enhancements (like window and lock replacement), transportation to hearings, temporary hotel stays and utility payments. One extended success story described a survivor who suffered severe injuries, accrued medical bills and lost work hours; VOCA-funded help covered roughly $2,000 in utility assistance to stabilize the household while prosecutors pursued criminal charges.

The advocates said Layton’s VOCA allocation was cut by $63,000 for the 2025–27 award period (about $31,500 per year), leaving only roughly $8,000 per year available for housing assistance under the new award. As a result, staff said the program must prioritize emergency-response items — safety enhancements, hotel stays and similar immediate needs — over rent and longer-term housing assistance. The advocates said Clearfield’s analogous program suffered parallel cuts, and that the reduction will increase unmet need in the region.

Advocates described caseload activity for 2024–25: about 52 housing-related services for 21 victims in the housing stream, and roughly 1,000 total victims served to date across victim services (court support, protective-order assistance, safety planning and referrals). They said advocates also coordinate with prosecutors to seek restitution in criminal cases, but restitution often takes months or years to materialize, which is why emergency VOCA-funded payments are important.

Council members asked how recipients are prioritized under the smaller award; advocates said they are revising policies to focus on the most urgent needs (home invasions, broken locks and direct safety threats) and to route clients to partner agencies when possible. Staff and council members discussed local coalitions, the Safe at Home mail-forwarding program and other referral networks. Prosecutor Mark (identified as a city prosecutor) and staff praised the advocates’ work and highlighted a recent case in which joint advocacy and prosecutorial action led to an arrest and six months in jail for a man who threatened a survivor — a result advocates said produced immediate safety and measurable benefit to the victim’s children.

No formal action was taken; advocates requested continued council support and flagged the need to monitor federal funding and to coordinate cross-agency referrals as VOCA funding declines.","Layton's victim advocates described a reduction in VOCA funding that will sharply limit housing support, shifting resources toward emergency safety needs and increasing demand for referrals to partner agencies.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6191835,"Layton Council adopts midyear amendments and adopts proposed 2025–26 budget with no tax increase",5034,563000,5597000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=4413485-a246dfcc4f6152424f6ee15188311dee&start=563&end=5597","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/4413485-a246dfcc4f6152424f6ee15188311dee/thumbnail_563000.jpg","/articles/6191835/Utah/Layton-Council-adopts-midyear-amendments-and-adopts-proposed-202526-budget-with-no-tax-increase","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6191835-077c5ee53f4f63736a95edeb7ba6d929/orig.mp4?Expires=1771086028&Signature=oY7uL2JzYuMQ0jxB06wk7SvwxxVO7Swb2nfqdBCrUlOgbVW0NfuZYg-mETysbynuDekh0XBd5DZH6RuH0OdDms2F3535aXmZBNcdD3d1CfIDjPZabB30zU1rQlXzhbBsxNZViDisISLUVwlMqlMIr~Vo5KqDhgZSmyNE1jnFkqwIIJM4xyNPHwvvHxdDBScsGn1kEOBuDYegER5cp8kpCQ73AArqhLeg9kSQvUAIcJA5Ozqgj0eA331UnA2uQc39edSqcI61x1HFqq98AgU9IVY987t5HsPKNq14obHdz3GWlkykgBE1g4708WmwM1yupoOtA1WRwBMcQ8z~ajU7Dg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Layton City Council approved amendments to the current fiscal-year budget and adopted the city’s proposed budget for fiscal 2025–26 during its June 19 meeting, voting unanimously on both measures.

The amendments to fiscal 2024–25 increase the general fund appropriations by about $1.8 million, of which roughly $500,000 is an appropriation of fund balance; staff said about $300,000 of that was a bookkeeping correction and roughly $200,000 represents additional midyear spending. The council also approved recognizing about $1.1 million of unanticipated revenues, including reimbursements for wildland fire deployments, police special services, fire academy activity and smaller donations and grants.

The council then adopted the proposed 2025–26 budget, which carries no property-tax increase. The general fund budget is about $48 million and the total citywide budget (including utilities) is roughly $129.8 million. Planned spending includes roughly $2.9 million for equipment and $23.6 million for capital projects, with a number of large projects in the utility funds. The budget keeps the city’s reserve policy near its long-standing target (staff said Layton generally maintains reserves near 15 percent rather than the statutory maximum).

Tracy Probert, presenting the amendments and budget on behalf of city staff, told the council the adjustments are necessary to comply with state law and accurately reflect revenue and grant awards that were not known at the time the original budget was adopted. He explained that some city activities, such as sending crews to wildland fires, are first funded by the city and then reimbursed, which is why midyear amendments are sometimes required.

On rates, the council approved implementing the North Davis Sewer District increase (a district decision) and a city-side increase tied to the district: North Davis raised its monthly sewer fee by $2.50, and Layton’s adopted city-side increase is $2.64 per month for residential customers; commercial variable charges also rise 25 cents per thousand gallons. The council noted these increases are tied to district-level costs rather than a new local tax.

The adopted 2025–26 budget includes market merit and cost-of-living adjustments for city employees (excluding elected officials), continued funding for capital projects such as the dispatch/communications center and pool-dome work, and targeted street and park projects. Staff emphasized that property tax makes up less than 9 percent of total city revenue and that sales tax is the largest single revenue source in the general fund.

Council members asked staff questions about reserve policy, the timing of projects and whether midyear amendments represented recurring shortfalls; staff repeated that most amendments reflect one-time reimbursements or grant recognitions rather than structural deficits. The council voted by roll call to adopt the amendments (ordinance 25‑14) and to adopt the proposed 2025–26 budget (ordinance 25‑13).","The Layton City Council approved amendments to the current fiscal year budget and adopted the proposed fiscal 2025–26 budget, including modest sewer rate increases tied to North Davis Sewer District and planned capital projects funded largely from utilities and reserves.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Layton reports substantial completion of St. Petersburg sidewalk project after extensive root removal

Layton Fire to issue RFP for EMS provider after state licensing changes; city seeks to remain provider

Layton staff outlines off‑leash options; council hears trade‑offs and suggests trial corridor

Layton victim advocates warn federal VOCA cuts will shrink housing assistance

Layton Council adopts midyear amendments and adopts proposed 2025–26 budget with no tax increase