Santa Rosa reviews missing middle housing design standards and development requirements

In the heart of Santa Rosa's city hall, a pivotal discussion unfolded on August 21, 2025, as the Design Review and Preservation Board delved into the intricacies of missing middle housing. This innovative housing concept aims to bridge the gap between single-family homes and larger apartment complexes, offering a solution to the growing demand for diverse housing options in the community.

The meeting highlighted the importance of lot size and design standards in facilitating the development of these housing types. Board members discussed how larger lots could accommodate multiple duplex units without the need for subdivision, allowing property owners to build and rent several units while maintaining ownership. This flexibility is crucial for addressing housing shortages, as it enables developers to maximize the use of available land.

A key point of clarification emerged regarding the terminology used in the zoning code. Board members emphasized that "lots" in this context do not refer to legal property lines but rather serve as design guidelines for placing units on a property. This distinction is vital for ensuring that developments meet the minimum width and depth requirements necessary for construction.

The board also examined a table outlining the primary housing types permitted in various zoning districts. It became clear that smaller building types are favored in certain areas, while larger structures are restricted to designated zones. This zoning strategy aims to create a harmonious blend of residential units that align with the character of Santa Rosa's neighborhoods.

As the discussion progressed, the board explored the design elements that contribute to a pedestrian-friendly environment. Emphasizing the importance of street interaction, members noted that parking should be situated at the rear of properties, reminiscent of early 20th-century development patterns. This approach not only enhances the aesthetic appeal of neighborhoods but also fosters a sense of community.

Frontage types were another focal point, with various options available to developers to encourage engagement with public spaces. The board underscored the necessity for shared public areas and private open spaces, particularly in neighborhoods lacking proximity to parks or trails.

While the board acknowledged that Santa Rosa is not starting from scratch, they expressed optimism about the potential for infill projects that could revitalize existing neighborhoods. The conversation concluded with a recognition of the standards in place for larger block developments, should opportunities arise in the future.

As Santa Rosa navigates the complexities of housing development, the insights shared during this meeting reflect a commitment to creating vibrant, inclusive communities that cater to the diverse needs of its residents. The board's discussions mark a significant step toward shaping the future of housing in the city, ensuring that it remains accessible and adaptable for years to come.