Cedar Island Lake Council Approves Variance for Impervious Pavers Despite Community Concerns

In the heart of Stearns County, Minnesota, the Board of Adjustment convened on August 14, 2025, to address pressing concerns surrounding a property on Cedar Island Lake. The meeting unfolded under the watchful eyes of community members and officials, as discussions centered on a proposed addition of patio pavers that sparked a complex debate about environmental regulations and property rights.

The property in question, nestled within a shoreline overlay district, faced scrutiny due to its existing impervious surfaces. The applicants, Michelle and Jeff Bertram, sought to add 375 square feet of patio pavers, exceeding the 250 square feet limit allowed within the shore impact zone. Initially, they had considered using a pervious paver product, which would have required engineering and periodic assessments to ensure functionality. However, time constraints led them to opt for impervious pavers instead, raising concerns among board members about the potential impact on the lake's water quality.

As the discussion progressed, it became clear that the property had a troubled history. Previous owners had left behind an illegal gazebo and other unpermitted structures, complicating the current owners' efforts to comply with regulations. Board members expressed frustration over the lack of oversight in past property transactions, noting that without proactive inquiries from buyers, many issues remained hidden until now.

The board weighed alternatives, including the possibility of using permeable pavers, which would not require a variance and could mitigate runoff concerns. However, the applicants indicated that they could live without the pavers, emphasizing their desire to create usable outdoor space rather than merely seeking to increase property value.

Ultimately, the board voted to deny the variance for the impervious pavers, citing concerns over environmental impact and adherence to shoreland protection ordinances. In a separate motion, they approved the applicants' request to replace and reduce the size of an existing deck and garage structure, recognizing the need for safety improvements and compliance with current regulations.

The meeting concluded with a sense of resolution, as the board navigated the delicate balance between property development and environmental stewardship. As the Bertrams move forward with their plans, they will need to consider alternative solutions that align with the county's commitment to preserving the integrity of its natural resources. The outcome serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges faced by property owners in navigating the complexities of local regulations while striving to enhance their homes.