The gubernatorial candidate interview with Bob Ferguson took place on June 9, 2024, focusing primarily on education funding and policy in Washington State. The discussion began with Ferguson addressing the state's obligations regarding education funding, stating that he believes the state is currently falling short. He emphasized that, despite a significant investment of $7 billion following the McCleary lawsuit, there has been a noticeable decline in funding since that time, which has not kept pace with the growing needs of students, particularly in special education.

Ferguson highlighted the increasing demands for educational resources, including mental health support in classrooms, which he noted as a critical issue affecting both students and the overall learning environment. He expressed a commitment to prioritizing education if elected governor, suggesting that the governor's office should take a more active role in educational matters, which has traditionally been limited.

The candidate proposed that the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) should be part of the governor's cabinet to enhance accountability and streamline educational governance. He supported the idea of making the superintendent a non-elected position, which could lead to more cohesive educational policy and implementation.

Ferguson also addressed the low college-going rate among local students, despite Washington's high per capita rate of college degrees. He identified the need for better communication regarding financial aid opportunities, particularly the FAFSA form, which he noted many students are unaware of. He suggested that the governor's office could play a crucial role in promoting these resources to high school students and their families.

Regarding charter schools, Ferguson clarified his historical stance, indicating that while he defended the charter school initiative as attorney general, he has not been a strong supporter of charter schools or vouchers. He acknowledged the need to examine the funding disparities between charter and traditional public schools but did not express a definitive position on granting charters access to levy funds.

In conclusion, Ferguson's interview underscored his commitment to addressing educational challenges in Washington State, advocating for increased funding, better governance, and improved access to higher education for local students. His proposals reflect a desire to enhance the state's educational landscape through focused leadership and collaboration with the legislature.