The St. Mary's County Police Accountability Board (PAB) meeting on August 21, 2025, focused on the impact of the Maryland Police Accountability Act of 2021, as highlighted in a report by the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF). The discussion revealed significant challenges in measuring the effectiveness of the Act due to inconsistent implementation across various jurisdictions in Maryland.

PERF's report indicated that the lack of standardized data collection methods among law enforcement agencies has hindered the ability to assess the Act's impact accurately. The report noted that many agencies do not track the same metrics or use consistent definitions for misconduct, making comparisons difficult. As a result, PERF was only able to answer four of the key questions posed regarding the Act's implementation.

Initial findings suggested that police officers are charged with misconduct less frequently under the Police Accountability Act compared to the previous Law Enforcement Officers' Bill of Rights (LEOBR). The sustainment rate for allegations was reported at 22% under the PAA, compared to 32% under the LEOBR. Additionally, disciplinary outcomes appeared to be less severe under the PAA, with only 1% of sustained cases resulting in termination, compared to 12% under the LEOBR.

The meeting also addressed the frequency of trial board requests, with some agency heads indicating that trial boards are being requested more often under the PAA due to the absence of options for negotiated settlements. This has led to a backlog in trial boards, particularly in larger jurisdictions like Baltimore City, where the costs associated with these boards can be substantial.

Another significant point raised was the recommendation for the state to revise the Police Accountability Act to clarify statutory definitions, which could alleviate the burden on agencies dealing with minor incidents. The discussion highlighted concerns about the ease with which complaints can be filed under the PAA, as complainants are no longer required to swear to their statements, potentially leading to frivolous accusations.

Overall, the meeting underscored the need for improved data collection and standardization across law enforcement agencies in Maryland to better evaluate the effectiveness of the Police Accountability Act. The PAB members expressed a commitment to addressing these issues and ensuring that the implementation of the Act serves its intended purpose of enhancing police accountability.