[{"_1":2,"_88":-5,"_89":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6487296,"mediaKeyId","5680825-056f475d9dd15c69eac029dc68a576d6","parentId",5680825,"title","Child nutrition program at risk: Wake County projects revenue losses if federal eligibility changes reduce CEP participation","audioSeconds",2425,"startMs",2897000,"endMs",5322000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5680825-056f475d9dd15c69eac029dc68a576d6&start=2897&end=5322","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5680825-056f475d9dd15c69eac029dc68a576d6/thumbnail_2897000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6487296/North-Carolina/Child-nutrition-program-at-risk-Wake-County-projects-revenue-losses-if-federal-eligibility-changes-reduce-CEP-participation","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6487296-cd9cf903a61b461e8e1a6ea722ee2874/orig.mp4?Expires=1773555872&Signature=HBG48YwseLtqh352LbO7TwkToeYoed6pcAyyZiRGSmbNHl1aQdhXLooVVlM9yDovl8Hfg28aCGVpUKW7PdSJ-QflWp7KGHJ4RLNh7IbEBn49v7oI02cvB8E97M4QBmltGiOFPHwPJ5pcTgDx-k393ucjoEjIAhUWB68CdgBZo0QruNKEyf91SK99dtwiTyyuJDV4-kKPyg8JnY2GjIBV7p~JHy~b3Xaeid~0CbwpBpkxUOaHGDrgXGnLYot7XtH5c30ETA40jdomRa72d8p6UNdUduc3mZZCGA-QPtmEINa1L6Fbl3yV0PEaz8bat4jPV~ZkVSPCya4uLdeAw-5fBg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Wake County Schools","date","2025-08-26T20:41:03Z","article","District nutrition staff told the Wake County Public Schools Budget & Finance Committee that a recent federal budget law will change eligibility calculations and could reduce the number of schools qualifying for the Community Eligibility Provision, imperiling program revenue and the district’s expectation of breaking even in its child nutrition enterprise fund.

“Currently, we have 44 CEP schools, which means that all of our students in those buildings eat meals at no cost,” said Miss Lawrence, a district child nutrition staff member. She warned that changes to SNAP and Medicaid qualification criteria included in the recently enacted federal budget bill will affect “direct certification,” the mechanism that identifies students who automatically qualify for free meals and underpins CEP eligibility.

Projected impacts on CEP and revenue

Lawrence presented scenario modeling showing how CEP participation could shrink if district direct‑certification counts fall. “If I lost 10% of my kids, 15% of my kids, 20% of my kids that were directly certified, how does that impact CEP? … If I lost 10% of my student population for DC, the schools that will remain would be about 11 schools instead of the 44, and then we will make $3,600,000 in revenue there,” Lawrence said. She added that a 15% drop would reduce participating schools to six (about $1.2 million revenue) and a 20% drop to four schools, noting that some students may still qualify through household applications but that staff cannot predict how many would be recaptured.

Program finances and reserves

Staff reminded the committee that the child nutrition program operates as an enterprise fund, which should generally break even. Mister Nieder explained the district’s operating‑months target: historically the program carried roughly two months of operating costs in reserve, but the reserve has trended lower in recent years. “We were traditionally operating back in 2014–15 with just over 2 months. … If we looked at it for 24–25, it would be back down in that single month category,” he said. Staff noted the program’s reserve has fallen to roughly one month of coverage in the most recent accounting, leaving little buffer if reimbursements and participation decrease.

Drivers of rising costs

Lawrence and other staff said the program faces two primary cost drivers: food and labor. Staff pointed to long‑running wage pressure for hourly child nutrition workers and recent increases that have raised the district starting rate to $17.75 per hour. They also cited elevated food prices since the pandemic and general inflation as continuing upward pressures. “Costs are going to continue to increase to provide a child nutrition program,” Mister Nieder said.

Options and tradeoffs

Staff outlined the options available if the program’s reserve falls toward zero: raise meal prices or participation, seek additional federal or state subsidies, capture more revenue through household applications, or shift local operating dollars to cover the child nutrition deficit. Mister Nieder confirmed that the board legally could use local funding to cover child nutrition obligations but cautioned that “every dollar that comes over here is a dollar that can't be spent over here,” noting the tradeoffs with classroom and other district priorities.

Committee questions and next steps

Committee members asked about outreach to families to increase household applications, local procurement and farm‑to‑school partnerships to control food costs, whether additional staff could help families navigate verification changes, and the potential for county or state action to offset federal reductions. Staff said they already conduct outreach and can expand efforts, and that some federal procurement and product‑specification rules limit local purchasing flexibility.

Ending

Staff presented the child nutrition briefing as informational and recommended continued monitoring; they said they will return to the board with updates if direct‑certification or reimbursement changes materialize and that the district will track potential options, including targeted outreach and budget tradeoffs.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","2025-08-26 Budget & Finance Committee","oneSentenceSummary","Staff told the Budget & Finance Committee that changes in federal eligibility rules tied to SNAP/Medicaid could sharply reduce schools qualifying for the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP), risking millions in lost child nutrition revenue and pushing the district toward using local funds if federal or state relief does not arrive.","taxTitle","Wake County Schools, School Districts, North Carolina","taxId",14083,"location","North Carolina","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6487301,"Wake County budget update: interim budget holds as state enacts limited ‘mini‑bill’; federal grant terminations reduce revenue",1676,430000,2106000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5680825-056f475d9dd15c69eac029dc68a576d6&start=430&end=2106","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5680825-056f475d9dd15c69eac029dc68a576d6/thumbnail_430000.jpg","/articles/6487301/North-Carolina/Wake-County-budget-update-interim-budget-holds-as-state-enacts-limited-minibill-federal-grant-terminations-reduce-revenue","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6487301-b55680f29e3b72755a7ad2409772ea06/orig.mp4?Expires=1773555872&Signature=oDm0IazVpf1iteBmWsWnlzCE1ZW6LBisY1w96LiocVW78h7KccsdMVc~iuXWqBLTc9EkzVfwt0qXpmo45n~CU43Zfznnta6oYkCFFI5FQHGxROUgEoyIBkZQkZSG-gkqoHMHOfcQOJH5abRabK84GP-MMrUuW6SsjN2AxdS7gbJwHzfPnrAfZNhB04UsKif-uD7B0YqyTkFubzoNLnl2f1wdGBvWgEbWzlnLZ5rZX-yM4fzXd1HVnhgqDw1Lrlar7EJOZpAeCXzIeAagVK0z4DgJLzmHzI0NU7yxIaf5g5HB5ilZUlvmXkUoGC3z~FiBQHihtqlX3pJCkMvkQ7OhsQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Wake County Public Schools finance staff told the district’s Budget & Finance Committee on Aug. 1 that the board is operating under an interim budget while it awaits final state actions and that recent federal grant terminations and a limited state “mini‑bill” will change next year’s revenue and compensation calculations.

The committee received two updates: an operating budget review and a deeper look at child nutrition finances. “We talked about what the state has done, because now the state has taken some steps since June 24 to put in place a budget,” said Mister Nieder, a district staff member, summarizing the committee briefing. He added: “We don't make recommendations to the board on finalizing its overall budget for a fiscal year until we know what the major implications will be.”

The interim budget: why it matters

The board adopted an interim budget earlier this summer after the county approved an increase in its appropriation but before a final state budget was in place. Mister Nieder said the interim budget allows the district to continue operating on prior‑year spending levels but “we can't really start doing anything new,” because the district cannot responsibly finalize appropriations while major state actions and compensation rules remain uncertain. He and other staff noted that about 80% of the operating budget pays salaries and benefits, making legislative compensation changes particularly consequential.

Federal grants and funding uncertainty

District staff told the committee that two federal grants were terminated earlier in the year: the teacher and school leaders grant (focused on recruiting teaching staff) and a school‑based mental health grant (for counselors and social workers). “Those 2 grants together were multi‑years and the value of them was approximately... $30,000,000 combined,” Mister Nieder said. Staff said the district had begun hiring with those dollars and that termination was disruptive, but they did not report any reduction in force.

Separately, staff described a nationwide freeze in certain federal formula funds in June that temporarily halted Title II, Title III and Title IV funding even after congressional approval; those funds were later released. Staff also said one magnet grant (the Nexus grant) remains unresolved and funding that was expected in spring has not yet been released; staff are using carryover funds but said they will not be sufficient to cover the full year if the grant is not restored.

State action: House Bill 125 and certified staff steps

Staff reviewed the limited state budget enacted this summer (referred to in the briefing as House Bill 125), which they called a “mini‑bill” that addresses a narrow set of items rather than a full biennial budget. Miss Kimsey, a district staff member, told the committee that the mini‑bill included technical corrections to average daily membership (ADM) allotments and adjustments for certain allotments (transportation, exceptional children and limited English proficiency), which corrected preliminary state allotments that had been lower than expected.

The mini‑bill also authorizes a step increase for certified employees (teachers and some instructional staff) but does not change the step schedule itself, staff said. “Compensation drives a large portion of the budget. We all know that about 80% of the operating budget goes towards staff, salaries, and benefits,” Mister Nieder said. Doctor Mattel (district staff) told the committee the district plans to implement the certified‑staff step increases with the September payroll and to make the increases retroactive to the start of the year where applicable.

Who is not included

Staff emphasized which employee groups the mini‑bill did not cover: principals, central office administrators on banded pay schedules, classified school‑based support staff (bus drivers, child nutrition workers, custodians, office staff, instructional assistants) and many central office categories. “There is no current legislation for any compensation increases for school principals, for central office administration, and our banded employees,” Mister Nieder said.

Budget next steps and board timing

Staff told the committee they will not recommend a finalized district budget until they can see the full implications of state actions and any further federal developments. Mister Nieder said it is possible the legislature will take no further action beyond the mini‑bill, that it could pass additional mini‑bills, or that it could reconvene to pass a comprehensive biennial budget. He suggested the district may have an updated picture soon after Labor Day but said that if the situation remains unclear by November, staff will return with recommendations to finalize the budget.

Questions from committee members focused on practical impacts: whether new programs already approved by the board can be started before final state funding arrives, how the county’s increased appropriation affects new‑school staffing, and what flexibility the district has to contract or scale back existing programs if expected federal dollars do not arrive. Mister Nieder said there is latitude to adjust contracts and reduce spending, but doing expansion before funding is certain carries financial risk.

Ending

Staff presented the operating budget update as informational and opened the meeting for committee questions. Committee members asked staff to provide additional clarifications on enrollment growth counts used by the state, the district’s carryover assumptions for unresolved grants, and the timeline for bringing a final budget recommendation to the board if state actions stall.","Wake County Public Schools staff told the Budget & Finance Committee an interim district budget remains in place while state and federal funding shifts, including two federal grant terminations (about $30 million combined) and a limited state budget (House Bill 125) that authorizes modest step increases only for certified staff.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Child nutrition program at risk: Wake County projects revenue losses if federal eligibility changes reduce CEP participation

Wake County budget update: interim budget holds as state enacts limited ‘mini‑bill’; federal grant terminations reduce revenue