[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6506479,"mediaKeyId","5680548-0d62f163f8b54dd13eaf8950219336d3","parentId",5680548,"title","Supervisors approve redesigned Signal Hill home within Connell footprint with conditions after months-long dispute","audioSeconds",2598,"startMs",8355000,"endMs",10953000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5680548-0d62f163f8b54dd13eaf8950219336d3&start=8355&end=10953","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5680548-0d62f163f8b54dd13eaf8950219336d3/thumbnail_8355000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6506479/Monterey-County/California/Supervisors-approve-redesigned-Signal-Hill-home-within-Connell-footprint-with-conditions-after-months-long-dispute","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6506479-c582f9dcdb35d9571d55784964e14d2c/orig.mp4?Expires=1773557158&Signature=Zv2PS4EqS1TLVe1GMc0FrmUy~il17aqbWGsZBDqLyXRR2mOQhPnltq4wuU6Zmc~qMI0GLKFydlD8cgxL1WVyEOk~cDtMpf-SPphaIo7a6DZzTK69ByFO3KArarvxHgzU1FNsyv~0weh3iXwJE7iCEFoOU9bZpvYqCRNF9sdxCiM2a3kKukFTslbInStw8I5MBGmSpbYUEfKad9toDsACOaUnm7pzMUj7K3vR1yXc8NuUb3CS3Rz5MnE-qAmcku3c8fVRwFrvfXFwvMwhHYF~XU1g3RYiF8aboAIUwAOap1x4T8F5Ms0EBr3Vle2PnihwEjhGNKk0dLsER2iZjX-0~A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Monterey County","date","2025-08-26T21:24:21Z","article","The Monterey County Board of Supervisors on Aug. 26 approved a redesigned single-family dwelling for PLN 240077 (Signal Hill Road, Pebble Beach) after months of appeals and public controversy over the earlier demolition of the Connell House, a modernist structure. The board\u0000\u0000in a 4-0-1 vote with Chair Lopez abstaining\u0000\u0000accepted staff\u0000\u0000and applicant-proposed revisions that county staff said bring the proposed house within the previously developed footprint and preserve the reduced-height design required under Alternative 6 of the project\u0000\u0000environmental review.

Why it matters: The site has been the focus of intense community debate. Appellants argued the redesign remained larger and taller than the historic house the county had authorized for demolition; the applicant and county staff said the new design meets the board's prior direction to keep the replacement within the original footprint and below the ridgeline.

What the board approved: Planning staff presented a modified design that removed previously contested elements\u0000\u0000including about 780 square feet of coverage by removing development in a previous patio area and an exterior stair; it also reduced the garage to two cars and proposed relocation of two cypress trees with a conservation easement increase. Staff concluded the revised plan is consistent with Alternative 6 in the certified EIR and meets land-use and visual-resource policies for the Del Monte Forest area.

Conditions and appeals: Supervisors approved the design subject to conditions added at the dais: a height-verification condition requiring an on-site benchmark and measurement before final roofing so the permitted height is not exceeded; a requirement that the inner courtyard areas remain pervious or landscaped (not counted as new impervious footprint); and a requirement that landscaping use native dune plants consistent with the EIR and Del Monte Forest requirements. Staff also pointed out that an approval would be appealable to the California Coastal Commission; a denial would not be.

Public comment and controversy: The meeting included testimony from the applicant, Massey Metapour, who said the design fully meets the board's 2023 direction to follow Alternative 6 and remain within the existing footprint. Appellants and preservation groups, including the Alliance of Monterey Area Preservationists, argued the Connell House\u0000the house that was torn down\u0000had been larger or differently measured than the board\u0000s earlier reference and said renderings provided by the applicant misrepresented siting and screening. Appellants also argued the new house remains significantly larger and taller than the Connell House and that the demolition and site work had already caused irreversible change.

Board deliberations: Supervisors debated technical measures (how footprint and height were measured, whether the new plans were staked and flagged on site) and process concerns (ensuring conditions would be enforced during construction). Several supervisors said they wanted additional procedural safeguards during construction and better signage and public documentation showing how the replacement fit within the original disturbed area. County planning staff said the revised plan places exterior walls within the footprint line as measured by the engineer Whitson and that the proposed typical height from average natural grade is about 25.5 feet; the Connell House had been measured in the EIR at about 22 feet from average natural grade.

Vote and next steps: The motion to approve the revised design with conditions was moved by Supervisor Church and seconded by Supervisor Askew. The board voted 4-0-1 (Lopez abstained) to approve the design approval resolution with the added conditions. Staff will include the conditions in the building-permit review and verify height and footprint during inspections; the board also asked planning staff to ensure the landscape plan uses native dune species and that the inner courtyard is pervious or landscaped rather than impervious surfacing.

Quotations attributable to speakers in the meeting:
\"At the last month, you reiterated that you want us to follow the 2023 motion and direction,\" applicant Massey Metapour told the board, asking for approval of the revised plan. (Transcript excerpt.)

\"This is a very difficult item,\" Supervisor Askew said, referencing community distrust and the demolition that preceded the current submission.

Ending: The board closed a long-running dispute by approving a revised design the county says meets the EIR Alternative 6 footprint and height objectives; the approval comes with tight conditions and a plan for heightened inspection and verification during construction. The approval can be appealed to the California Coastal Commission.
","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","County of Monterey Board of Supervisors Meeting 8/26/25","oneSentenceSummary","Monterey County supervisors gave final approval Aug. 26 to a redesigned Signal Hill home (PLN 240077) after a year of appeals, finding the latest plans fit within the previously developed Connell House footprint and meet the EIR\u0000Alternative 6 parameters, subject to conditions on height verification, courtyard surfacing and native dune landscaping.","taxTitle","Monterey County, California","taxId",3728,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6506483,"Monterey County supervisors set framework for Measure AA spending, direct quarterly allocations and early road projects",2080,3837000,5917000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5680548-0d62f163f8b54dd13eaf8950219336d3&start=3837&end=5917","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5680548-0d62f163f8b54dd13eaf8950219336d3/thumbnail_3837000.jpg","/articles/6506483/Monterey-County/California/Monterey-County-supervisors-set-framework-for-Measure-AA-spending-direct-quarterly-allocations-and-early-road-projects","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6506483-5353c3975038a709a862310f7c252022/orig.mp4?Expires=1773557158&Signature=HhbEVojXQ2QnpH2gcnafZQKfKoZ5zTPv74SmpuG2bU95cKdWndTT9iBU0aIyCaC3KwX8XXToKMVU5Zk5Dodgl3O2xD3z3yTP2p2vZdidDtuqVX9gb2t50G1otFw9tuR36DR-jkUcVRxathicG03lCx-tm9p-3ebqEgCIN-rpi3Ib9fr7spFE1YpnP0NaSyLc14dyDIy29DALc8HpKLlufkGqFyXzxFdjfuWAZkAL0iZay7Ou8hcYHXd6v7mbmcIBoKfDJMNJgVHX9TZx9~5B7zoQKhNYCu6WjYAl727MtzBuLcfW~4AXuG63sLB8iCW2~hYP3UVgesDHEKLOtW1szA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Monterey County Board of Supervisors on Aug. 26 affirmed priorities for spending revenues from Measure AA, the county\u0000\u0000one-cent sales tax approved by voters earlier in 2025, and directed staff to allocate receipts on a quarterly basis while prioritizing highly visible road and parks projects and new programs.

Supervisors also affirmed three specific, previously referred budget items and asked staff to develop procedures for spending as revenues arrive. \"Those budget priorities will be the priorities for the next fiscal year,\" county staff summarized during the meeting, and the board voted to use quarterly allocations to move money into projects as receipts are collected.

Why it matters: Measure AA was placed on the ballot and promoted to address long-standing infrastructure and service shortfalls in the county\u0000\u0000particularly road maintenance, parks, homelessness response and other county priorities. Voters approved the tax after polling showed strong support for repairing roads and maintaining infrastructure. County leaders said they want early, visible results to maintain public trust and to match the priorities voters identified.

What the board decided and why: The board\u0000\u0000following discussion that included budget staff, the county administrative officer and the director of public works\u0000\u0000endorsed an ad hoc committee\u0000\u0000recommendation that the spending priorities adopted in an earlier 2024 resolution remain the priorities for fiscal year 2025-26. Beginning with fiscal year 2026-27, the board directed that allocations be made on a quarterly basis to match revenue flow and produce early results. The board also adopted guidance that Measure AA revenue should fund new programs and projects and should not be used to cover ongoing commitments.

County staff and department heads told supervisors they have preliminary \"early success\" proposals ready for the first year of spending, including a proposed secondary-road rehabilitation program focused on unincorporated roads raised by communities in public outreach. Randy Ishii, director of Public Works, said staff\u0000\u0000working from preliminary revenue pacing assumptions\u0000\u0000had identified candidate roads and an initial proposal roughly in the range of $7.6 million that would not exhaust next fiscal year's receipts.

Money collected and commitments: County staff told the board that receipts are arriving in tranches. The county reported about $2 million in collections for the April\u0000June quarter, and later a quarter \"true up\" was reported to be about $5 million; staff cautioned estimates will firm only after a full year of receipts. The board previously set aside about $4.4 million in the 2025 budget and earlier approved a $1.45 million allocation to fund Axon body cameras for the sheriff, plus $50,000 each for an ag-tech initiative and a blue-economy regional project. At the meeting supervisors and staff noted those earlier commitments are already on the county's books.

Public input and oversight: Public commenters included Director Ishii and representatives of local organizations. Several supervisors and members of the public urged the board to establish a citizens' oversight committee and clear project signage so residents can see where Measure AA dollars are spent. The board asked staff to return with recommended committee language and to build communications materials explaining how projects are selected and which unincorporated roads will be prioritized.

What\u0000next: The board's motion instructs staff to use the adopted priorities for fiscal 2025-26, allocate funds quarterly beginning in fiscal 2026-27, and return with implementing language for oversight and project selection. The board also directed staff to preserve flexibility for future budgets while emphasizing early, visible road and park projects for the initial deployment of funds.

Quotations attributable to speakers in the meeting:
\"We\u0000we've already spent nearly 5.9 of that money that has not yet come in,\" Supervisor Lopez said during debate, reflecting board concern over earlier budget commitments relative to early receipts. (Transcript excerpt.)

\"This is something that staff have been considering, have been working on,\" Public Works Director Randy Ishii said, describing early road rehabilitation proposals the department had prepared.

Ending: The board approved the ad hoc committee's recommendations with direction to staff to return with committee and implementation details; supervisors said they expect to revisit allocations annually as revenue patterns become clearer and to publish project-level updates for the public.
","After months of planning and debate, the Monterey County Board of Supervisors affirmed budget priorities for the county\u0000\u0000sales-tax measure (\"Measure AA\") and directed staff to allocate receipts quarterly, prioritizing visible road and parks projects while avoiding funding ongoing commitments, with several small allocations already affirmed.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Supervisors approve redesigned Signal Hill home within Connell footprint with conditions after months-long dispute

Monterey County supervisors set framework for Measure AA spending, direct quarterly allocations and early road projects