[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6502917,"mediaKeyId","5689772-b77697f7bb120dc678a28c7ef38ed66f","parentId",5689772,"title","ARB approves addition to landmark property at 83 South Riverview with design conditions, grants footprint waiver","audioSeconds",3054,"startMs",6862000,"endMs",9916000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5689772-b77697f7bb120dc678a28c7ef38ed66f&start=6862&end=9916","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5689772-b77697f7bb120dc678a28c7ef38ed66f/thumbnail_6862000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6502917/Ohio/ARB-approves-addition-to-landmark-property-at-83-South-Riverview-with-design-conditions-grants-footprint-waiver","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6502917-0033024836c91d03fe98b0e91b41128d/orig.mp4?Expires=1770495244&Signature=LxFv7YCQNVtFSJ0g~P7a22HC1L6qMQMznXhRqp3JW82ILDPz~sANrlMP5MuGuAYHJgOx5XQsuJG3EFnsw3Jy6KyZegs7YA3lyNwRvs1-AAFUro9FKY4cuH2r6RHTj32r7FywOd7rVNM-qyqgiAqaETH7jm276b-j1fczdwvh0J8ow6AYPv2q9zlv-fbimhWjzvaUvKZ2NWjGZCV4nMGws0YDKUHgWQ8uFJV7hMj0hdW3aMvrt9iKz-3SlWAH-nWuEbjb5Uf16Vn8SNrBaoobs2nEtBxdvOIClhHVOf83UNvEGz8bqShFney9Cgwd0P4kj5UJBAXLDoEDbZy4ZRaRLw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Dublin","date","2025-08-27T00:00:00Z","article","The Dublin Architectural Review Board approved an addition to a landmark property at 83 South Riverview Street (the Eliade Sells House) and granted a building‑footprint waiver for the project, contingent on a list of design conditions staff recommended.

Planner Miss Holt described the site and the addition plans, noting the property includes historic outbuildings (a blacksmith shop and privy) that staff and the applicant intend to preserve. The applicant requested a building‑footprint waiver because the proposed total footprint would be approximately 28.4% of the lot, above the district’s typical 25% guideline; staff recommended the waiver because the existing historic outbuildings increase the effective coverage and preservation of those features weighed in favor of the waiver.

Board and staff discussed multiple design refinements the ARB wanted addressed before permits: lower‑story window proportions (staff asked for vertically proportioned windows rather than square sash), clearer window and trim specifications (simulated divided lights with spacer bars instead of grills between glass), improved casing details for paired triple windows, capped and coordinated stone water‑table details and mortar color, confirmation of window types on the historic portions, and consideration of a slightly flatter roof pitch on the 1930s‑era addition to improve visual separation from the historic fabric.

The applicant, Jeff Hom, said he had consulted with an independent historic architect (Karen Bocor) and made numerous adjustments in response to informal comments, including simplifying siding material and revising window groupings. Hom stated he preferred some choices Bocor recommended; he resisted an all‑glass hyphen proposal after learning the hyphen would back onto a bedroom. Staff and the board asked the applicant to supply detailed product specifications, physical paint chips and scaled details for windows, columns and stone caps; staff also asked the applicant to reconcile minor conflicts in submitted documents (for example, clarifying that an existing brick patio will be reused and specifying flagstone for the front walkway).

Motion and votes: The ARB first voted to approve the requested building‑footprint waiver (28.4% of lot) to preserve on‑site historic outbuildings. The board then voted to approve the proposed addition with the enumerated conditions; recorded votes indicated unanimous support among members present for both the waiver and the conditioned approval.

Conditions the board required include: submission of scaled column and classical detail drawings; window and door specifications showing simulated divided lights with spacer bars and sash proportions that meet the guidelines; a detail for the stone water‑table cap and mortar matching; confirmation of material and paint chips on file; revised roofing seam widths as considered by staff (optional) and minor roof‑pitch modifications if they reduce impacts to historic fabric; and matte or low‑reflective finishes for chimney caps and roof penetrations.

Staff will verify these materials and details before issuing building permits, and the waiver finding will be recorded in the project file.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Dublin - Architectural Review Board","oneSentenceSummary","The ARB granted a building‑footprint waiver and approved an addition to the Eliade Sells (landmark) property at 83 South Riverview Street, subject to conditions on roof pitch, window proportions, classical column details, material samples and other design refinements.","taxTitle","Dublin City Council, Dublin, Franklin County, Ohio","taxId",72672,"location","Ohio","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6502922,"ARB approves new front porch and rear shed at 85 Franklin Street with design conditions",4261,2602000,6863000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5689772-b77697f7bb120dc678a28c7ef38ed66f&start=2602&end=6863","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5689772-b77697f7bb120dc678a28c7ef38ed66f/thumbnail_2602000.jpg","/articles/6502922/Ohio/ARB-approves-new-front-porch-and-rear-shed-at-85-Franklin-Street-with-design-conditions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6502922-fc306294d0ddec251f110a4228c8d434/orig.mp4?Expires=1770495244&Signature=AFhEq3k-C11wA2frpD~f9fQXBurtGIqiBvGVl4XK92TkM8nkJUKpSjJgLeMGGE41-TCmRhA4OoKgD5tr8~LcV90j4Tx2zbPiSalwYjL77zNflvcFTeFaK9ba8drA4b3mg~sxdYO~N9g~kQP0R8f66Hgt-DSWurfUDWhbaxEo7TbQPZqpVCO64Uip-589-W1lIVwnkRYYZ1UesepfpZ529bdTso4k2JwZnJx~ASA1zP2~fovwfvyLN88UpZxwCMGkjPEYxOduZBTM2Hd9meOlft0SyzOHUr3aWfish8wRgaI0kSu0E1fBklBgvdiJd2kbYglI8F7bKchWsnOcf2Zutw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Dublin Architectural Review Board approved construction of a rear shed and a front porch addition at 85 Franklin Street in the Historic Residential district, adopting conditions and clarifications after extended discussion about setback consistency, porch depth, column spacing and roof material.

Staff presented the case and recommended disapproval of the porch as proposed but recommended approval of the rear shed with no conditions. The board and applicant negotiated design details during the public hearing. The homeowner, Aaron Frank, and architect Heidi Bolliard presented revised plans that reduced porch massing, added classical trim and proposed a seven‑foot porch depth with a 29‑foot, 10‑1/2‑inch width. Frank told the board the porch would mitigate solar heat gain on the front windows after the loss of a mature hackberry and support neighborhood interaction.

Neighbors, including Michael Strang (75 Franklin Street) and Alan Suter (80 Franklin Street), spoke in support, saying front porches increased walkability and neighbor engagement. Board members debated whether the porch would violate the guideline objective of maintaining a consistent building line in the background neighborhood; several members observed that setbacks on Franklin Street vary and that the proposed porch would remain substantially further from the street than many other homes.

The board discussed roof material for the porch (standing‑seam metal versus asphalt shingles) and whether to require four or six columns. Several board members said a standing‑seam roof was practical for the proposed low pitch, and others preferred a six‑column configuration for proportion. The applicant offered to add an additional pair of columns if the board preferred.

Motion and votes: The board voted to approve the rear shed as recommended by staff. For the porch, the ARB moved to approve the front porch addition as proposed in case 25‑071 MPR with the porch dimensions set at 7 feet deep by 29 feet, 10.5 inches wide and with the option of either four or six columns; the motion passed on the recorded board vote. The shed motion and the porch motion both carried by recorded yes votes from the members present.

Clarifying details captured at the hearing: the porch depth is 7 feet; the applicant reported the house’s northeast corner sits about 59 feet from the street and that, even with the porch, the porch would be about 53 feet from the street at the closest point; the applicant noted they had already reduced the porch pitch and inset the porch edges to avoid placing columns in front of windows. The applicant also provided physical paint and material samples at the meeting for staff review.

Staff will require the final construction drawings to show column details, window and trim specifications, mortar and cap details for the foundation water table, and consistent plan/narrative language before permit issuance.","The Architectural Review Board approved a separate rear shed and approved a new seven‑foot‑deep front porch for a home at 85 Franklin Street after discussion about setback, roof material and column spacing; the shed was approved without conditions and the porch approval incorporated board preferences on columns and roof material.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6502927,"ARB clears first rooftop solar installation in Dublin’s historic residential district",898,1726000,2624000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5689772-b77697f7bb120dc678a28c7ef38ed66f&start=1726&end=2624","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5689772-b77697f7bb120dc678a28c7ef38ed66f/thumbnail_1726000.jpg","/articles/6502927/Ohio/ARB-clears-first-rooftop-solar-installation-in-Dublins-historic-residential-district","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6502927-1fe2d57d8b83df93cab7f64f87972d42/orig.mp4?Expires=1770495244&Signature=CwecktSrWE5p0nNCaKZPtCOwa5QPi1UJzxhlQtH5TOhIsa1J0OMNAjpmQvslkUWSoMJTHvU1v-4E7OjQIIKOIjPKwNysg3SNFQ3oyb-0vtNJEsAVhee95vsXr~cHElotCryC1bjhBDrOUGMC9eEkvaRtqHrBIrL6BLUuLQR46g9Eu1nxMRhY6Yu5Lp1O~biwA9lzVvsVP6jMo3oBS5BVvr2MnNQmugrO9a0chQi-rXPU-aifpCsbYYig5AUQ0vQgMDFMfifzzF66P4wkqZJQ4AwD6fv4jesHSgC54CW9bAM5pj7V-GXQ7uJvhD5cRt9Tf7nIUErawsIlQLagCw3IIg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Dublin Architectural Review Board approved a minor project review allowing roof‑mounted solar panels on a single‑family home at 55 Franklin Street, the first such application approved under the city’s recently adopted solar regulations.

Planning staff said the system will place panels only on the side and rear roof slopes and that the applicant proposed 40 black, anti‑reflective panels mounted to a rail system and integrated to minimize visibility. Staff recommended approval, noting the applicant meets the code’s front‑facing color and configuration requirements even though those requirements apply only to front facades under the city’s updated solar rules.

Planner Sarah Noble told the board the city adopted initial solar regulations in June 2023 and amended them in December (procedure described in the staff presentation) to apply certain color and configuration requirements only to front facades; that change raised ARB approval rates for residential panels from roughly 35% to about 95%, Noble said. Noble also described required performance and design standards in the code: panels must be low‑profile (no more than six inches above the roof line where applicable), use dark colors or be roof‑colored on the front, be integrated with the roof design, conceal equipment and minimize light trespass.

Applicant Andrew Christensen, who owns a local roofing company, told the board the rear and side placement and mature vegetation along Mill Lane will keep the array largely out of public view. He said the proposed installation is sized to meet the home’s usage, covering about 90% of household demand, and not to export power to the grid. The applicant provided product information for low‑reflectance panels with a 25‑year product warranty and a 30‑year performance rating.

Board members praised the application as an example for future applicants; one member called the layout unobtrusive and said it should be a model for other homeowners. The board voted unanimously to approve the minor project review.

Motion and vote: The ARB moved to approve case 25‑074 MPR to allow installation of roof‑mounted solar panels on the single‑family structure as proposed; the motion passed with recorded yes votes from the members present.

Staff will complete the standard permit review and ensure final installation matches the approved panel color and configuration and that rails, mounts and penetrations are concealed per code.

This approval was the board’s first solar case since the city’s updated regulations took effect; staff said they will report back to City Council on approval rates and implementation.","The Architectural Review Board approved the first rooftop solar array under Dublin’s new solar regulations for a single-family home on Franklin Street, with conditions limiting visibility from the street.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":92,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6502932,"Architectural Review Board approves aquamarine awnings for Boho 72 storefront",1527,199000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5689772-b77697f7bb120dc678a28c7ef38ed66f&start=199&end=1726","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5689772-b77697f7bb120dc678a28c7ef38ed66f/thumbnail_199000.jpg","/articles/6502932/Ohio/Architectural-Review-Board-approves-aquamarine-awnings-for-Boho-72-storefront","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6502932-89c87db8f0e78974a809f939c9e93619/orig.mp4?Expires=1770495244&Signature=M2CEmZ2-ot4SLS3W4iVSrQdAdcCkQr7O5q-0iFhF0G0DxQhfX~fSr~2Rnf4NVxa9hxwD8CrK0WYBRtYUqvRZnGQytkUbLPZFvHN~34H414SiouIY6X1Wun8~5-dtp-9nPqrSYvVR74xpSOZJk4t9j6f37cxV2KQa0OyjXywy9f1ehYKiyN2v8APRDLgMYj5epV7RokNxCGL6K2NaS1VVJgGGLBpDxIcSer2CB79sy9knSGJRbP4UjgJ3FOlr2ECMcCW0SMc01ao997alqycv7emylJ2T1KgVCrD34KZB4If~ryEUko8iq-oI07ddTK80nVoqg1way9jpclsoIslB9w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Dublin Architectural Review Board on an unnamed evening approved a minor project review allowing aquamarine Sunbrella fabric awnings for the Boho 72 boutique at 55 South High Street in the Historic South district.

Board members debated the owner’s preferred cream-and-charcoal striped awning, but staff brought an alternative solid aquamarine option after the applicant and staff met following the July hearing. The board voted to approve the aquamarine awnings by a 4–1 tally.

Staff planner Sarah Noble told the board the property is a 0.5-acre site zoned Historic South and that the building is a nonhistoric, multistory background structure surrounded by landmark buildings. Noble said the applicant’s original striped proposal had been tabled at the July hearing and that staff had worked with the applicant on a revised palette intended to be sensitive to surrounding buildings and consistent with the previously approved site sign.

An applicant representative said owner Jamie sought higher visibility from passing pedestrians and drivers and described local customer support: a social-media poll run by the owner drew 309 responses over two days, with 233 (75%) favoring the cream-and-charcoal stripe, 38 (12%) favoring olive green and 20 (6.5%) preferring the aquamarine staff proposed.

Board members disagreed about which approach best matched the historic district. One member said stripes were not historically consistent with the district and preferred a solid color; another said the stripes risked creating a “circusy” effect if repeated by other tenants. The board’s chair, Miss Pat McDaniel, voted no.

Motion and vote: The board made a motion to approve the minor project review as presented with the aquamarine awning color; the motion passed by a recorded tally of four yes and one no. The record shows Miss Dammeser, Dr. Stetchelty and Miss Cooper voting yes and Miss Pat McDaniel voting no; one board member voted yes but was not captured by name in the transcript.

Because the ARB was one member short that evening, Noble reminded the board that three votes were required for approval.

The decision allows the applicant to install the specified fabric awnings at the two storefront openings described in the application; staff will coordinate final material samples and installation details as required for permits.

The board then moved on to other cases on the agenda.","The Dublin Architectural Review Board approved a minor project review allowing aquamarine fabric awnings for the Boho 72 storefront at 55 South High Street after debate over a previously proposed cream-and-charcoal striped design.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

ARB approves addition to landmark property at 83 South Riverview with design conditions, grants footprint waiver

ARB approves new front porch and rear shed at 85 Franklin Street with design conditions

ARB clears first rooftop solar installation in Dublin’s historic residential district

Architectural Review Board approves aquamarine awnings for Boho 72 storefront