[{"_1":2,"_86":-5,"_87":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6456247,"mediaKeyId","5691928-8746d2dea73222eee368fbd8712fdc90","parentId",5691928,"title","Revere ZBA continues review of 145-foot radio tower for McKinley emergency center after residents raise concerns","audioSeconds",1935,"startMs",80000,"endMs",2015000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5691928-8746d2dea73222eee368fbd8712fdc90&start=80&end=2015","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5691928-8746d2dea73222eee368fbd8712fdc90/thumbnail_80000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6456247/Revere-City/Suffolk-County/Massachusetts/Revere-ZBA-continues-review-of-145-foot-radio-tower-for-McKinley-emergency-center-after-residents-raise-concerns","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6456247-87093b7c55a9bb0b99a47e6a2a70b9cb/orig.mp4?Expires=1774786899&Signature=ZtC4F5C1Nr6sZFzheGF-1qYG~eM6bT~Zay-UQ0kIAEWQyfGHE~8W1HI95U7mLzLnBh0zQGEI5MEYaEAqSeSXwvgUkTDdZdZdmEdgXAa5SK9EAjlaqX-HdHl76PvhBGhaR40wKGtd6BMnj7jk-RqdHHXPipbK-rvV6PhcHCEkn0ndZt73F0-Dr8HSLSjozeeE4SyDtfSIko0vWnXvraR22hzgyhw0rpxHW6VN7QUU9GI2z5UHeGSmogMLvWADeGbGclfgPX3b8nW0sKSSXv~GJ4R2UWMt6-loV2aikVit~hWxsS3K3eLdBt5ZE7vQPgryl4onxOZ8647xUQM4P1QWag__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Revere","date","2025-08-28T10:21:33Z","article","The Revere Zoning Board of Appeals on a unanimous roll call moved to continue consideration of the City of Revere’s application for variances to build a 145-foot radio tower at the McKinley redevelopment site, deferring the matter to the board’s September meeting after neighborhood concerns and a request from the Ward 4 councilor.

City officials said the tower is a critical, locally controlled microwave link to support the Metro North Regional Emergency Communications Center serving Revere, Chelsea and Winthrop. Tom Skorofsky, Chief of Planning and Community Development and project manager for the McKinley redevelopment, told the board the antenna is not a commercial cell facility and that the tower provides a redundant communications path when fiber lines fail.

The tower would sit behind the McKinley building, next to the city’s parking office, and support a new Metro North REC dispatch center to be located in the 1924 wing of the redevelopment. Skorofsky said the overall project includes an early‑childhood center with eight pre‑K classrooms, municipal offices for the parking and retirement boards, training and dispatch space for the regional communications center, and common basement uses. He said asbestos, PCB and lead abatement work is complete, bids for an old oil tank removal were due the next day, construction documents are in progress, the city aims to bid later this year, begin construction in 2026 and open the facility in 2027.

Public‑safety staff provided technical details: Skorofsky and Ivan, the consultant from Introba who worked on the design, said the proposed tower foundation would be about 19 by 19 feet and sit roughly 5.5 feet deep. Ivan explained microwave dishes on the tower connect the dispatch center to remote radio sites. He said the network is owned and maintained by the Metro North REC, not leased from commercial carriers. Ivan told the board the tower needs roughly 110 feet to reach the Winthrop water tower and about 145 feet to reach the Chelsea Soldiers’ Home; most antenna elements will be below 100 feet, but two dish antennas about two to three feet in diameter are planned above 100 feet.

Whitney Morgan, executive director of the Metro North REC, described instances when radio links dropped and dispatchers lost contact with first responders, and said the microwave link would restore communications automatically if the fiber feed fails. Jay Mazzolo, the REC’s operations/dispatch representative, said the city has lost fiber service repeatedly in recent years and that fiber repairs can take days; he said the microwave backup preserves in‑building and street‑level portable radio coverage that officers and firefighters depend on. Fire Chief Jim Cullen and Police Chief Bridal Levita said portable radio coverage inside buildings is a life‑safety issue and that the tower is intended as a resilience measure rather than a continuous transmitting cell site.

Opposition centered on visual impact, timing and possible health and property‑value concerns. Paul Ogenzio, Ward 4 councilor, said he is an opponent and asked for a continuance so the neighborhood, council and others could review communications analyses and alternatives. \"The visual impact in this neighborhood . . . is going to be immense,\" Ogenzio said, and he asked that the design team appear before the city council and evaluate alternatives and cost tradeoffs. Resident speakers also urged consideration of existing infrastructure and urged more independent analysis.

Chair Tucker put the continuance motion to a roll call. Board members Mister Lemina, Mister Lopes, Mister O’Brien and Mister Pelton and Chairman Tucker all voted yes; the board continued the matter to its September meeting. No mover or seconder for the motion was recorded on the transcript.

The city said it would honor the councilor’s request to continue and will provide additional technical materials. Skorofsky said the presentation to the ZBA was a courtesy and that the administration is willing to reduce tower height if a smaller height can achieve required public‑safety communications at reasonable cost.

What’s next: the ZBA will take the item up again in September. City staff and the Metro North REC indicated they will supply additional technical studies, comparative site analyses and answers to questions about alternative sites and equipment configurations.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting 8/27/25","oneSentenceSummary","The Revere Zoning Board of Appeals on a unanimous roll call moved to continue consideration of the City of Revere’s application for variances to build a 145‑foot radio tower at the McKinley redevelopment site, deferring the matter to the board’s September meeting after neighborhood concerns and a Ward 4 councilor’s request for more information.","taxTitle","Revere City, Suffolk County, Massachusetts","taxId",5660,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6456243,"ZBA roundup: driveway denied, storage withdrawal, parking pad and chicken coop variances approved; 6‑story condo variances approved with conditions",0,2720000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5691928-8746d2dea73222eee368fbd8712fdc90&start=2720&end=2720","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5691928-8746d2dea73222eee368fbd8712fdc90/thumbnail_2720000.jpg","/articles/6456243/Revere-City/Suffolk-County/Massachusetts/ZBA-roundup-driveway-denied-storage-withdrawal-parking-pad-and-chicken-coop-variances-approved-6story-condo-variances-approved-with-conditions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6456243-d861dc203f2ed650f585d2e223f399de/orig.mp4?Expires=1774786899&Signature=f-talactbNtCLs8tZX8D5m7L6RYz2v0poJMk8r3ZltL7W~GCh5HDmvJ6Y12wTpVkeY9zHuoPN8AAq36qbl2oM1-EPnPXwi-aLl4J-5mE0u-OBeEP1eMGDRlR3uHDJIDkvbJj-W4DDrZaXviwA0Wo8HsL1Sq7lrPApG7FIjJZhtKe4fQzCQ~oJ6xSFHq3rQtL3LTNIQzT2dquUnxAN6y2FA8Eva8mpRacN6x6K6mxl8tXdriUOVutAX2PC4rX5VzyXWTvhKdCUEMmtZLvyXykRiuA0ucpZMIgx8HpLbN-uGASO4Y5XP7sz-KXZafBdXMQqjX5OwQTtlsNZYceJAzXEQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Revere Zoning Board of Appeals on a recorded vote on multiple agenda items during its meeting: it denied a driveway variance at 70 Warren Street, allowed an applicant to withdraw a proposal for a six‑story self‑storage building without prejudice, and granted variances for front‑yard parking at 218 Bellingham Ave, a chicken coop at 128 Malden Street, and a six‑story mixed‑use condominium at 76–82 Revere Beach Boulevard subject to standard recording and site‑plan conditions.

70 Warren Street (A2514): The board denied the request from Hicham Alam to construct a 13‑by‑14‑foot driveway. Board members voted no on granting relief (Mister Lemina — no; Mister Lopes — no; Mister O’Brien — no; Mister Pelton — no; Chairman Tucker — no). The variance was denied.

Kem’s Development Corp. (A2517): The applicant seeking a variance to build a six‑story self‑storage facility at 195 American Legion Highway submitted a motion to withdraw without prejudice. The ZBA allowed the withdrawal on a roll call vote (all members yes).

218 Bellingham Ave (A2518): Applicant Jeremy Crossgrove sought permission to construct a 23‑by‑22‑foot parking pad in the front yard of a single‑family lot. Crossgrove said the lot has limited usable rear yard space and that the project would remove an unused concrete pool area and return roughly 1,200 square feet to green space while creating two off‑street parking spaces. The board granted the variance subject to standard ZBA conditions: rights lapse if not exercised within one year, the variance must be recorded in the Suffolk County Registry of Deeds, and site‑plan review approval is required before a building permit. Roll call votes: Mister Lemina — yes; Mister Lopes — yes; Mister O’Brien — yes; Mister Pelton — yes; Chairman Tucker — yes.

128 Malden Street (A2519): The board approved a variance to allow a chicken coop and run in the side yard. Neighbors testified supportively at the hearing. The board granted the variance with standard recording and site‑plan conditions. The board noted local ordinance prohibitions on roosters. Roll call: Mister Lemina — yes; Mister Lopes — yes; Mister O’Brien — yes; Mister Pelton — yes; Chairman Tucker — no; the variance was granted.

76–82 Revere Beach Boulevard (A2520): The ZBA granted variances for a six‑story transit‑oriented mixed‑use condominium building proposed by 76 To 82 Revere Beach Boulevard LLC. Nancy O’Neil, the applicant’s attorney, described a 6‑story building with 80 condominium units, one commercial unit proposed as a restaurant, and 82 parking spaces (80 spaces dedicated to the condominiums and two for the commercial unit). The applicants included an affordability component: 10% (eight units) offered at 80% area‑median income. City planning staff supported the project and urged the board to approve the relief as consistent with redevelopment along the beach. Opponents raised concerns about precedent for hardship claims and potential impacts to views and long‑standing small businesses. The board approved the variances subject to the standard recording, one‑year lapse, required site‑plan review, a prohibition on participation in the city’s residential and visitor on‑street permit parking program for the property, and a requirement that any change from condominium to rental apartments requires reappearance before the ZBA. Roll call votes: Mister Lemina — yes; Mister Lopes — yes; Mister O’Brien — yes; Mister Pelton — yes; Chairman Tucker — yes.

The board’s actions included routine statutory and recording conditions and standard site‑plan review requirements. Several public speakers used the hearings to raise broader concerns: one opponent asked the board for an independent third‑party survey and evaluation of hardship claims; a small‑business owner asked for an opportunity to negotiate a presence in the redeveloped Revere Beach property. The ZBA did not change any of the standard recording or site‑plan conditions it routinely applies to variances.

Votes and next steps: the denied and approved variances are subject to recording in the Suffolk County Registry of Deeds and to site‑plan review where required. The withdrawn application was allowed without prejudice; the applicant may refile.","At its meeting the Revere Zoning Board of Appeals denied a driveway variance, allowed a withdrawal without prejudice, and granted several variances including a mixed‑use condominium project at Revere Beach Boulevard with specific conditions including parking rules and a requirement to reapply if dwelling use changes.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Revere ZBA continues review of 145-foot radio tower for McKinley emergency center after residents raise concerns

ZBA roundup: driveway denied, storage withdrawal, parking pad and chicken coop variances approved; 6‑story condo variances approved with conditions