[{"_1":2,"_104":-5,"_105":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74,84,94],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":59,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":65,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},"mediaId",6500814,"mediaKeyId","5701910-0454b181fb93e8aa63a0a01fc1c97f40","parentId",5701910,"title","Pilot asks council for clear hangar policies and pilot advisory board; council and staff raise coexistence concerns","audioSeconds",1422,"startMs",4105000,"endMs",5527000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5701910-0454b181fb93e8aa63a0a01fc1c97f40&start=4105&end=5527","thumbnailUrl","https://d352y6ypj4mjo3.cloudfront.net/AudioPlaceholder.png","articleUrl","/articles/6500814/Richfield/Sevier-County/Utah/Pilot-asks-council-for-clear-hangar-policies-and-pilot-advisory-board-council-and-staff-raise-coexistence-concerns","mediaUrl","author","Richfield City Council","date","2025-08-26T19:00:00Z","article","Joseph Bostic, an aircraft owner and long-time pilot, urged the Richfield City Council to adopt transparent written policies governing hangar leases, approvals and lease renewals at the Richfield Airport and asked for a pilot advisory board to represent tenants’ operational interests.

Bostic described his decades of flying, international competition results using thermals out of Richfield and his plans to invest in a large hangar to host visiting glider pilots. “This airport is just something that is unbelievable,” he said, adding that he is ready to invest resources and asked the council to “please adopt transparent written policies for hangar leases and approvals” and to “establish fair, consistent lease rates for all tenants.” He also asked the council to form a pilot advisory board to provide technical input on airport uses.

Council members and staff acknowledged Bostic’s presentation and said they had been working with him on a proposed hangar; staff confirmed the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) paperwork process is in motion and that FAA Form 7460 clearance (review for proposed vertical development) had been submitted for at least one hangar.

Other airport stakeholders raised concerns about how expanded glider operations might interact with other airport uses. One speaker described operational conflicts in other communities — such as glider or parachute activity overlapping fixed-wing traffic and temporary closures or NOTAMs that affect operations — and warned that firefighting and helicopter activity sometimes require restricting airport operations. City staff and the manager noted that the airport has federal funding obligations and existing infrastructure improvements tied to firefighting and other services. Staff said the FAA clearance process and coordination with federal partners means the city must consider safety, liability and mission-critical uses before formalizing long-term hangar arrangements.

Council members said they were not opposed to private investment but flagged the need for a coordinated policy that balances tenant investment and airport operational responsibilities. Several participants suggested continuing the discussion in a staff-led working group and that the council and staff would return with recommendations on hangar leases, lease rates and a potential advisory board.

No formal policy or ordinance was adopted at the meeting; staff said they had already submitted required FAA paperwork for potential hangar construction and would continue to work with Bostic and other tenants on a transparent process.","mediaType","Audio","parentTitle","08.26.25 Counci Meeting - lmr_20250826_190152","oneSentenceSummary","Pilot and hangar tenant Joseph Bostic asked the Richfield City Council to adopt written hangar-lease policies, set consistent lease rates and form a pilot advisory board to guide investments at the Richfield Airport.","taxTitle","Richfield, Sevier County, Utah","taxId",68867,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":50,"_51":81,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":82,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":83,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},6500818,"Ridgeville 1800 South bike path design mostly finished; council pauses to resolve right-of-way funding gap",1641,2632000,4273000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5701910-0454b181fb93e8aa63a0a01fc1c97f40&start=2632&end=4273","/articles/6500818/Richfield/Sevier-County/Utah/Ridgeville-1800-South-bike-path-design-mostly-finished-council-pauses-to-resolve-right-of-way-funding-gap","City staff told the Richfield City Council the Ridgeville 1800 South bike-path project is approximately 85% complete in design but faces a funding shortfall driven mainly by larger-than-expected right-of-way costs in the UDOT process.

“We’re about 85% finished with the design,” the project presenter said, noting $76,000 had been spent on design to date (including UDOT’s time). Staff told the council the initial right-of-way estimate was $56,000 but a shotgun estimate from UDOT later increased that figure to about $81,000. That change — plus contingency and other adjustments — left the city about $47,600 short of the budget the project currently needs for right-of-way acquisition and to proceed toward advertisement.

Devin (city staff) explained a major increase stemmed from how the city and UDOT classify “prescriptive use” (areas of property that UDOT typically would not compensate because of existing public utility or drainage use). Counsel recommended compensating a portion of that prescriptive area at a reduced value, and staff said they planned to pay property owners 30% of full value for the prescriptive portion. The staff estimate attributed roughly $15,000–$20,000 of increased cost to that change in valuation.

Staff also explained that one parcel behind Good Shepherd Lutheran Church that was omitted from earlier estimates had been added; golf-course frontage on several parcels pushed valuation higher for those holdings. Staff noted the environmental clearance (the categorical exclusion) had been approved in June and that UDOT’s right-of-way process typically requires six to eight months; if the council commits to cover the shortfall and the right-of-way work begins promptly, staff said the project could advertise in spring and construct in summer of the following year.

City staff recommended the council sign a letter committing to cover additional costs so UDOT could proceed. Council member Jared moved to approve the additional funding; another council member then moved to table further action until the council’s next scheduled meeting. The council set the next meeting date as Sept. 9 and the motion to table was entered; staff said if costs grew beyond a preset threshold the council would be asked to return for approval.

Council discussion included whether the city could reduce the offer to property owners for prescriptive areas (the attorney said the reduced offer could be defensible but recommended compensating owners some amount). Staff said they had included roughly $17,000 contingency above UDOT’s estimated right-of-way values and that the entire right-of-way estimate could still change when offers are formally made.

The council did not adopt a final funding commitment at the meeting; members voted to table the item to the council’s next meeting on Sept. 9 so staff could provide additional detail and, if necessary, pursue partners or alternate savings.","City engineers told the council the Ridgeville 1800 South bike-path project is about 85% designed but faces a roughly $47,600 shortfall driven largely by higher-than-estimated UDOT right-of-way costs; the council voted to table action to the next meeting for further review.",{"_33":85,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":86,"_41":87,"_43":88,"_45":89,"_47":90,"_49":50,"_51":91,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":92,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":93,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},6500823,"Developer urges council to ease subdivision hurdles, cites lost homes and impact fees",2463,200000,2663000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5701910-0454b181fb93e8aa63a0a01fc1c97f40&start=200&end=2663","/articles/6500823/Richfield/Sevier-County/Utah/Developer-urges-council-to-ease-subdivision-hurdles-cites-lost-homes-and-impact-fees","Corey Lincoln, a local developer and resident, told the Richfield City Council he is concerned that the city is losing new-home construction to nearby towns and urged council members to make it easier for developers to create lots inside Richfield.

“It concerns me as a citizen that we are letting so many residences be built outside of Richfield City,” Lincoln said, citing a 16-month span in which neighboring communities built 51 homes while Richfield recorded 13. Lincoln added that Richfield currently has few subdividable parcels available and that developers face significant costs and permitting hurdles.

Lincoln said Richfield has about 8,154 water meters and cited monthly water charges averaging $21; using those figures, he estimated that water and sewer receipts total roughly $2 million annually. He also listed the city’s usual impact fees for a new single-family home: water impact fee $8,300–$8,350, sewer $1,265, park/recreation $35.25, street $765, fire $321 and 1-inch water meter $536 — a total he calculated at about $14,666 per new home (not including building permit fees).

Lincoln described a past subdivision he developed after asking the city for assistance to connect to existing sewer lines and said the city’s investment of about $48,000 enabled seven homes to hook onto city water and sewer. He told the council those homes brought recurring utility and property-tax revenue, and he urged the city to consider similar accommodations for future developments.

City staff and council members responded with operational context. Michelle (city staff) said Richfield’s water and sewer operations “come to breakeven, just barely,” and that the city is not in the business of making a profit on utilities. “We’re in the business to provide service,” she said, adding that some grants are unavailable because rates are low enough that the city does not qualify for certain funding.

Council members asked for more details about specific parcels Lincoln mentioned, including a long, narrow Peterson parcel he said would be suitable for small starter lots if the council would consider modest adjustments such as narrower road widths, reduced setbacks and a combination curb-and-sidewalk standard. Lincoln said he has offered to help the Peterson owners and asked the council to indicate willingness to assist them with infrastructure or flexibility in standards.

Council members and staff noted trade-offs: reduced standards can lower per-lot costs but also change neighborhood character and long-term maintenance responsibilities. The discussion included repeated requests that Lincoln and staff bring specific plats or sketches for the council to review. No ordinance or formal motion was introduced during Lincoln’s appearance.

Lincoln closed by asking the council to “help the Petersons however possible” and said he would work with staff and the council if they signaled interest.

The council did not take formal action on any zoning, subdivision rules or the Peterson parcel during the meeting; members asked staff to follow up with details and options for future consideration.","Local developer Corey Lincoln told the Richfield City Council the city is losing home construction to neighboring towns because subdividers face high costs and regulatory hurdles; he urged the council to consider policy changes and help the Peterson family with a potential subdivision.",{"_33":95,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":96,"_41":97,"_43":98,"_45":99,"_47":100,"_49":50,"_51":101,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":102,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":103,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},6500809,"Council reviews short-term traffic change at middle-school drop-off to improve safety",605,5531000,6136000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5701910-0454b181fb93e8aa63a0a01fc1c97f40&start=5531&end=6136","/articles/6500809/Richfield/Sevier-County/Utah/Council-reviews-short-term-traffic-change-at-middle-school-drop-off-to-improve-safety","Trent (city staff) briefed the council on a temporary lane-closure experiment at the middle-school drop-off intended to reduce dangerous turning and queuing behavior.

The pilot closes the outside lane with cones so motorists drop students off in a single-staging lane and avoid swinging wide into the intersection. “We no longer gotta go in this, but I know what you’re saying,” Trent said of the new configuration, which staff reported has been in place about a week and a half.

Trent asked council members to drive by and observe the change; he said if the pilot proves effective staff will pursue longer-term design changes tied to future road connections and school-campus planning. He noted the city previously worked with the district and state agencies on other circulation improvements and that more substantial changes will require multi-year coordination.

No formal action was taken; staff asked council members to monitor the pilot and report back if safety or traffic flow issues persist.","The city has temporarily closed the outside lane at the middle school drop-off with cones to reduce intersection conflicts; the pilot has run a week and a half and staff asked council members to review the change in the coming days.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Pilot asks council for clear hangar policies and pilot advisory board; council and staff raise coexistence concerns

Ridgeville 1800 South bike path design mostly finished; council pauses to resolve right-of-way funding gap

Developer urges council to ease subdivision hurdles, cites lost homes and impact fees

Council reviews short-term traffic change at middle-school drop-off to improve safety