Muni Operators Protest New Personal Necessity Policy at SFMTA Board Meeting

The recent San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) meeting highlighted significant concerns from transit operators regarding a new policy affecting their ability to take necessary breaks during shifts. Operators voiced their frustrations over the "702" personal necessity policy, which they argue undermines their safety and well-being.

During the public comment section, several Muni operators expressed that the new policy, which restricts their ability to take breaks, could lead to dangerous situations on the road. Operators like Bridal Bartholomew and Sincere Kamisher emphasized that the ability to take breaks is crucial for maintaining focus and ensuring safety while driving. They argued that the policy disregards years of training that prioritize safety over strict adherence to schedules.

The operators shared personal stories, highlighting the physical and mental toll of working long hours without adequate breaks. Many pointed out that the lack of scheduled breaks is not only a health concern but also a matter of dignity. They stressed that operators are not machines; they are human beings who need time to address personal necessities, including medical conditions and family responsibilities.

Union representatives also joined the discussion, calling for the immediate retraction of the policy. They argued that the SFMTA's approach has created a hostile work environment and has led to a decline in morale among operators. The union leaders highlighted that the agency's claims about lost service time due to breaks are misleading and do not reflect the reality of operators' experiences.

The meeting concluded without a resolution, leaving many operators feeling unheard and undervalued. As the SFMTA continues to navigate these challenges, the voices of transit operators remain a critical part of the conversation about safety, dignity, and the future of public transportation in San Francisco. The ongoing dialogue underscores the need for a balanced approach that respects the well-being of those who keep the city moving.