Shelby County Ethics Commission Nominees Face Opposition During Board Vote

During the Shelby County Committee Meeting on September 3, 2025, significant discussions centered around the nominations for the Shelby County Ethics Commission, specifically the appointments of Yolanda Hardaway and Duane Thompson. The committee faced a divided response, with several commissioners expressing concerns about the ethical implications of the nominations.

Commissioner Morrison suggested that due to the low attendance, the nominations should be sent down without recommendation, but this motion was later withdrawn. The committee proceeded to vote on the nominations, which sparked a heated debate among members. Commissioner Mills and Commissioner Thornton both voiced their opposition, citing concerns over the perceived politicization of the ethics process and the handling of previous ethics complaints. They emphasized that their votes were not personal against the nominees but were rooted in a broader concern for maintaining ethical governance.

Commissioner White defended the need for the appointments, arguing that the Ethics Commission is essential for addressing accusations and ensuring accountability. He requested clarification from the County Attorney's Office regarding the powers of the Ethics Commission and the potential for expanding its options to better serve the community.

The meeting highlighted the ongoing tensions between the county's executive branch and the commission, with several commissioners expressing a desire for a more transparent and impartial process moving forward. As the committee prepares for the upcoming vote, the implications of these discussions will likely resonate throughout Shelby County, influencing public trust in local governance.