[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6478750,"mediaKeyId","5708272-4e8e7e0ddba49550b0e23c9688b3ecb8","parentId",5708272,"title","Advisory committee explores scenario planning, identifies tourism, climate and funding as top uncertainties","audioSeconds",6080,"startMs",1556000,"endMs",7636000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5708272-4e8e7e0ddba49550b0e23c9688b3ecb8&start=1556&end=7636","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5708272-4e8e7e0ddba49550b0e23c9688b3ecb8/thumbnail_1556000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6478750/Juneau-City-and-Borough/Alaska/Advisory-committee-explores-scenario-planning-identifies-tourism-climate-and-funding-as-top-uncertainties","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6478750-cfde5fc543c16df6364abc81c98ad352/orig.mp4?Expires=1773570625&Signature=JTkLlymeI6aJvLg8D~jZx~c2HPTfdivz8r4Mbs2PmJbFgNTK2mw96pi606iJC4IlCxe42omMzZDmhtwF1L-w0jPYXTsIx3x5bNRlVAf~q03X600VNobJM4mBAz0rltxckQfQ6Ry-AIEdvDfD4roOSh7rVGwxwX8TZ-MNjvf0JW8jb00~uWQql382JNx-vW4ym6OyzZeqF97s7hW~TFyq4mnr8lgclILmau47Abgx7Snqe3XRogIdF7JnGjZbV~POcVkQkL72GcHXa7UyJ2BSY8P4MC~imy-shG1u09rJ37r0o2yS95PDB6X9VvZ0ORLnHFGUn-LTxENutrK2X0rreg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Juneau City and Borough","date","2025-09-03T19:29:34Z","article","Juneau City and Borough advisory committee members and staff used the meeting’s main session to introduce scenario planning for the comprehensive plan, define three critical uncertainties, and run a preliminary ranking of 15 “resilient strategies” to test how policies might perform under different futures.

Staff explained scenario planning as a way to test policy options against plausible futures rather than assuming past trends will continue. The committee heard that the project team developed 10 drivers of change from expert interviews and prior meetings; staff said those drivers were distilled into three critical uncertainties that the land‑use scenarios will use for testing: tourism and its spillover effects; climate change and environmental hazards; and federal and state funding and policy decisions (the latter combining several drivers including transportation/infrastructure vulnerabilities and state fiscal stability).

After a short break, participants reviewed 15 strategy cards and used an online poll to indicate which strategies they felt would perform well against each critical uncertainty. Staff cautioned the poll was an initial “temperature check” and not a formal vote. Poll results discussed on the record included counts reported verbally by staff (participants later repeated counts in discussion):

- Tourism and spillover effects: top‑ranked strategies included economic diversification beyond tourism (12 votes), waterfront/downtown development and economic vitality (9 votes each), and multimodal transportation systems (7 votes). Affordable housing and strategic land use received fewer votes than some expected (about 4 votes reported by staff).

- Climate and environmental hazards: mitigation of natural hazards and protecting/restoring environment were top picks; participants emphasized the need to treat mitigation as managing risk and focusing on engineering, stormwater upgrades and sensible siting of new development rather than an absolute prohibition on all development in hazard areas.

- Federal and state funding/policy uncertainty: participants favored strategies that strengthen the local economy’s diversity and support Juneau’s regional hub role, and again flagged affordable housing and strategic land use as important if outside funding declines.

Discussion highlighted specific policy considerations rather than single answers. Participants suggested prioritizing infill and higher density where hazard exposure is low and existing infrastructure can be upgraded; protecting parklands and wetlands that provide flood resilience; investing in multimodal transit and circulators to reduce downtown congestion; and creating more neighborhood‑scale centers (the Mendenhall Mall/Twin Lakes corridor, parts of North Douglas and downtown Douglas were named as possible nodes) to reduce single‑corridor vulnerability and support year‑round commerce. Several participants advocated exploring diversified tourism offerings (longer‑stay visitors, accommodations such as cabins or hut networks) to reduce day‑trip cruise impacts.

Staff and participants discussed feasibility versus aspiration. Several attendees asked poll participants to consider both feasibility (what can be implemented given local authority and likely funding) and resilience (what would perform well across scenarios). Staff said subsequent meetings would run deeper workshops, produce mapped land‑use scenarios and apply quantitative metrics (transport access, water use, emissions, land consumption) to compare outcomes.

The committee closed by restating outreach options: the survey remains open through September; CBJ staff said they would e‑mail the resilient strategies to online participants; and staff noted a potential follow‑up meeting at Douglas Library on Wednesday, Sept. 10, 5–7 p.m., for additional conversation.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","CBJ Comprehensive Plan Update | Advisory Committee Meeting #3","oneSentenceSummary","Juneau City and Borough advisory committee members and staff used the meeting’s main session to introduce scenario planning for the comprehensive plan, define three critical uncertainties, and run a preliminary ranking of 15 “resilient strategies.”","taxTitle","Juneau City and Borough, Alaska","taxId",13703,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6478754,"Juneau advisory committee revises guiding principles, debates wording on housing and economy",1442,127000,1569000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5708272-4e8e7e0ddba49550b0e23c9688b3ecb8&start=127&end=1569","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5708272-4e8e7e0ddba49550b0e23c9688b3ecb8/thumbnail_127000.jpg","/articles/6478754/Juneau-City-and-Borough/Alaska/Juneau-advisory-committee-revises-guiding-principles-debates-wording-on-housing-and-economy","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6478754-a09c17d8977403d84ecc295135a35501/orig.mp4?Expires=1773570625&Signature=TU7Y~PUNV1N1shwO1VRPb8sMHksv-di0KEw1pMIsUC7tEGTTYhjyC6PIP1qVfiaRyp6-WRARcoNjHq7wPdrLEtOmoszbEkp-nCBMFDFQTaogaHY8KHxloi8fs7WtNQBRM~JYbtMMxBVmEn-YQTgj0fh0DLsnIKoTP-j8bm8b7q-xm2G~JwER8KW2YnDrcGf5RejSDd1a-XLfLAk8HZ7AX2iuLa0wqpkGTqCTl3nywEkFvWaMY7mpa5tX89dEjs5naSFR5pd2zUS4Kw5OTqu14fnTpHlY-FykCgmj8eowNFqmbm~aTuoZWRqv9c-9GTaCrpmR4I2t4mJNlsB6-p8a4Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Juneau City and Borough advisory committee members and city staff reviewed a revised set of guiding principles at their third meeting, focusing discussion on housing language, the interplay of housing and workforce retention, and phrasing around environmental and economic priorities.

The committee — which met in person at the Douglas Library with several members online — spent about 15 minutes on each principle, asking whether the revisions captured prior meeting feedback and whether any key themes were missing. Staff said the updated principles were drafted from prior committee input and staff work sessions and reminded members the principles are intentionally high level.

Committee members raised two recurring concerns. First, several participants objected to the word desirable in a housing principle that calls for “affordable, appropriate, and desirable places to live,” arguing desirable risks implying aesthetic standards rather than basic habitability. One attendee said the intent behind desirable was to rule out substandard living conditions — for example, units without running water or with shared kitchens and “hot plates” — but several asked that language be clarified so it does not exclude needed, lower‑amenity housing such as single‑room occupancy or transitional units.

Second, members repeatedly linked housing to workforce recruitment and retention. Speakers noted that professionals hired to work in Juneau sometimes decline offers after failing to find appropriate housing, and that vacancies in the school district and health care sector reflect broader housing and childcare shortages. Committee comments urged the plan to reflect both production of new units and better use of existing housing stock — for example, strategies to convert or better utilize currently vacant or seasonal rental units.

Members discussed alternate words for “accessible” and “desirable,” noting that accessible commonly refers to ADA compliance and may not capture the broader idea of “attainable” or “appropriate.” Several suggested restoring the term attainable or using “appropriate” with a clearer definition (for example: safe, functional and sized to household needs).

On the economic principle, committee members emphasized the importance of year‑round employment and noted shipping and freight costs as a constraint on construction and local businesses. Participants urged that resilience in the economy should explicitly acknowledge seasonality tied to tourism and the legislative session and consider policies to extend shoulder seasons or diversify employer sources so local services and infrastructure remain sustainable.

Environmental and infrastructure language prompted suggestions to broaden references to clean energy beyond hydroelectric expansion; one speaker urged replacing “expanded hydropower” with wording that fosters a cost‑effective local clean energy system that includes energy efficiency and multiple clean energy sources. Members also recommended adding recreation alongside tourism, fishing and mining as responsible uses of natural resources.

Committee members were reminded that the guiding principles are not ranked; staff said the top three principles (housing/family support; economy; and environmental protection) overlap and that revisions would seek to ensure key issues such as aging demographics and workforce recruitment appear where appropriate. Staff encouraged additional written comments via an open survey (a flyer and QR code were distributed) and said the survey would remain open through September.

The meeting closed the guiding‑principles discussion after committee members asked staff to refine language on housing quality, attainability and definitions of terms used throughout the principles.","Juneau City and Borough advisory committee members and city staff reviewed a revised set of guiding principles at their third meeting, focusing discussion on housing language, the interplay of housing and workforce retention, and phrasing around environmental and economic priorities.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Advisory committee explores scenario planning, identifies tourism, climate and funding as top uncertainties

Juneau advisory committee revises guiding principles, debates wording on housing and economy