Rock Hill Planning Commission Denies Rezoning Request for Trucking Operation on Saluda Road

September 03, 2025 | York County, South Carolina


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Rock Hill Planning Commission Denies Rezoning Request for Trucking Operation on Saluda Road
The York County Council convened on September 2, 2025, to address several zoning matters and public concerns regarding local developments. The meeting began with a public hearing session, where community members voiced their opinions on various rezoning proposals.

The first item discussed involved a proposed convenience center service station at the busy intersection of Highway 274 and Highway 161. A resident highlighted previous traffic impact analyses indicating that the intersection could face significant congestion, potentially reaching an "F" service level by 2027, despite past improvements. The resident urged the council to consider the implications of increased traffic in this area.

Next, the council addressed a rezoning request for a property at 1365 West Main Street. Local residents, including William Cureton and Lawrence Berry, expressed their opposition to the construction of additional storage facilities in their neighborhood, citing existing congestion and the presence of multiple storage units already in the area. They argued that the community does not need more storage buildings, emphasizing the negative impact on local traffic and aesthetics.

The council then moved to the first public hearing item regarding a rezoning action for a property south of Rock Hill. The applicant sought to rezone the land from Rural Development (RUD) to Light Industrial (LI) to allow for a trucking operation. However, staff recommended denial of the request, citing inconsistencies with the comprehensive plan and concerns about spot zoning. The Planning Commission had previously voted unanimously against the proposal. After public comments, the council voted to deny the rezoning request.

Following this, the council considered another rezoning case to subdivide a property into three lots for residential development. Staff recommended approval, noting that the proposal aligned with the character of the surrounding area. The council unanimously approved this request after a brief public hearing.

The meeting concluded with discussions on additional rezoning actions, maintaining a focus on community input and adherence to planning guidelines. The council's decisions reflect ongoing efforts to balance development with the needs and concerns of local residents.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments