Residents Demand Stronger County Intervention Against Excel's Solar Project Plans

The St. Croix County Board of Supervisors faced intense public scrutiny during their meeting on September 2, 2025, as residents voiced strong opposition to a proposed solar project that could cover over 5,000 acres of farmland. The meeting featured passionate public comments highlighting concerns about the environmental and economic implications of the project, which is being developed by Xcel Energy.

Kevin Conard opened the public comment session by questioning the projected $1.4 million revenue from the solar project, emphasizing that such figures are contingent on optimal weather conditions and may not materialize. He urged the board to consider the potential downsides of the project, which could leave local townships without any financial benefit.

Laura Conard expressed her apprehension regarding the board's resolution to authorize intervention in the project, arguing that it lacked clarity on whether the county intends to support or oppose the solar initiative. She called for a more definitive stance and the hiring of experts to ensure effective intervention, stressing the importance of protecting local agricultural interests.

Other residents echoed these sentiments, with Jan Sapirik criticizing the lack of transparency in the development process and urging the board to take control rather than relying on external legal advice. Bonnie Smith and John Van Dyke both emphasized the need for the board to prioritize the community's health and safety over corporate interests, with Van Dyke warning of potential environmental hazards associated with the solar panels.

Carrie Willoughby highlighted the risks of groundwater contamination and the long-term inefficiency of large solar complexes, arguing that the project would not provide tangible benefits to the community. She urged the board to reject the joint development agreement with Xcel and to intervene against the project at the Public Service Commission (PSC).

The meeting underscored a growing divide between community members and the county board regarding the solar project, with residents demanding more accountability and a commitment to preserving local farmland and environmental integrity. As the board prepares to make a decision, the implications of their actions could have lasting effects on the community's agricultural landscape and overall well-being.