The Public Service Commission of Maryland held hearings on September 3, 2025, to discuss the 9761 Drive Act, focusing on the integration of renewable energy sources and the operational challenges faced by utility companies. A significant point of contention arose regarding the inclusion of battery storage in the legislation, with some officials arguing that the act should encompass a broader range of renewable technologies rather than being narrowly focused on batteries.

During the meeting, representatives from various utility companies discussed their capabilities and limitations concerning grid injection, which refers to the process of allowing energy generated from behind-the-meter resources, such as batteries, to be fed back into the grid. One utility expressed concerns about its inability to track real-time energy injection without advanced monitoring systems, known as Distributed Energy Resource Management Systems (DERMs). This led to questions about why another utility, Baltimore Gas and Electric (BGE), could manage grid injection while they could not.

The discussion highlighted the need for clearer operational procedures to enable safe and effective energy injection from battery systems. Some officials criticized the passive approach of waiting for customers to participate in the pilot program, suggesting that proactive outreach to identify system constraints and potential contributors should be part of the initial rollout.

Additionally, the hearings touched on the topic of third-party ownership of energy resources. While one utility indicated it was open to third-party ownership, it was unclear how this would be implemented in practice.

Overall, the hearings underscored the complexities of integrating renewable energy technologies into existing infrastructure and the importance of clear communication and operational readiness among utility providers. The discussions will likely influence future regulatory decisions and the development of renewable energy programs in Maryland.