In a recent meeting of the Forest Hills Board of Education, a significant discussion unfolded regarding the future of the Odyssey of the Mind (OM) program, a creative problem-solving initiative that has positively impacted hundreds of students. The board members, many of whom are parents of children involved in the program, expressed concern over a recent contract change that reduced the number of OM coordinators from one per school to just three across the district.

The conversation began with a board member highlighting the program's value, noting that it has historically engaged over 200 students annually, fostering skills that extend beyond the classroom. However, the reduction in coordinators has raised alarms about the program's sustainability and effectiveness. The board was presented with a unique clause in the contract that allows for the establishment of additional positions under extenuating circumstances, a provision that had not been utilized before.

As the discussion progressed, members voiced their apprehensions about the implications of the coordinator cut. One board member, drawing from personal experience in various educational roles, emphasized the importance of adequate support for coordinators, warning that underpayment could lead to a loss of dedicated staff. The sentiment was echoed by others who recognized the program's role in providing a sense of belonging for students who may not engage in traditional sports or clubs.

The board deliberated on whether to invoke the contract clause to restore the previous number of coordinators for the current school year or to maintain the reduced structure. Many members expressed a desire to revert to the historical model, arguing that it would allow for a smoother operation of the program while a more thorough review of the coordinator roles could take place in future negotiations.

Concerns were also raised about the administrative oversight of coordinator assignments, particularly regarding whether coordinators should be compensated when no teams are active in their respective schools. This highlighted a need for clearer communication and accountability within the program's structure.

Ultimately, the board appeared to lean towards restoring the coordinator positions to ensure the program's continuity and effectiveness for the current year. This decision reflects a commitment to prioritizing student engagement and success, with plans to revisit the program's structure and funding in future contract negotiations. As the meeting concluded, the board members left with a renewed focus on the importance of supporting initiatives that enrich the educational experience for all students.