[{"_1":2,"_84":-5,"_85":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":59,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":65,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},"mediaId",6486803,"mediaKeyId","5732040-e932bd510c4510d2e1751dda9e2cb6b4","parentId",5732040,"title","Property owner told to survey and plat to record 24-foot right-of-way for storage units and duplex access","audioSeconds",484,"startMs",571000,"endMs",1055000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5732040-e932bd510c4510d2e1751dda9e2cb6b4&start=571&end=1055","thumbnailUrl","https://d352y6ypj4mjo3.cloudfront.net/AudioPlaceholder.png","articleUrl","/articles/6486803/Fielding/Box-Elder-County/Utah/Property-owner-told-to-survey-and-plat-to-record-24-foot-right-of-way-for-storage-units-and-duplex-access","mediaUrl","author","Fielding Planning Commission","date","2025-09-04T18:00:00Z","article","A property owner asked the council for guidance on creating a recorded right-of-way through one of their parcels to preserve access to storage units, a duplex and a separate building; council members advised surveying, platting, and working with a title company to record a minimum 24-foot right-of-way or easement.

Why it matters: The owner said the access is currently a gravel driveway used by renters and a neighboring storage-unit operator under a verbal agreement; without a recorded right-of-way or easement, future property sales could remove access for tenants or the storage operator.

At the meeting the owner presented parcel maps and said the existing gravel drive connects lots about 250–255 feet from the street to rear buildings. Council members and attendees discussed the technical difference between a right-of-way (access) and an easement (often used for utilities), and advised the owner to have the access surveyed and platted so the legal lines are recorded with the county. A council member said 24 feet is generally the minimum width for a private access lane and that utilities usually have separate recorded easements. The owner was told existing driveway use would likely be grandfathered but that the paperwork — a survey and recorded plat/easement — is needed to protect access in future transactions.

Council members recommended the owner consult a title company or an engineer/surveyor to prepare the easement/right-of-way and to bring the plat back to the council for review if needed. They cautioned that a recorded, general right-of-way should be described by the parcels and permitted uses (for example, access to the duplex, garage and storage units) rather than by individual names so future ownership changes do not create conflicts.

No formal council action was taken at the meeting on the right-of-way request; attendees were advised to return with a recorded plat and survey for any formal variance or frontage questions.","mediaType","Audio","parentTitle","Planning Commission Meeting Sept 4 2025 - PC 09-04-25","oneSentenceSummary","A property owner seeking to formalize an existing gravel access was advised to obtain a survey and a recorded right-of-way or easement; council members said 24 feet is the typical minimum width and recommended consulting a title company and recording a plat to protect access rights.","taxTitle","Fielding, Box Elder County, Utah","taxId",79994,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":50,"_51":81,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":82,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":83,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},6486808,"Council approves variance to permit ADU on parcel slightly below lot-size ratio",286,234000,520000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5732040-e932bd510c4510d2e1751dda9e2cb6b4&start=234&end=520","/articles/6486808/Fielding/Box-Elder-County/Utah/Council-approves-variance-to-permit-ADU-on-parcel-slightly-below-lot-size-ratio","The council approved a variance to allow a homeowner to use the accessory dwelling unit (ADU) rule on a combined parcel where the lot-size ratio is 0.74, short of the 0.75 required by the code.

The decision lets the property owner convert the existing house to an ADU and designate a new primary dwelling on the combined parcel, subject to usual setback and septic requirements. Council members said staff would sign and record the single-parcel plat and issue a letter confirming the variance.

Why it matters: The variance removes a technical barrier the owner said was preventing progress on a planned new primary residence and an ADU arrangement. The council’s action formalizes an exception to the lot-size ratio in order to allow the property to be platted and building permits pursued.

At the meeting a homeowner (identifying the project as a “Fielding” home) told the council that county health staff had reviewed septic locations and approved the siting, and that lot lines had been redrawn to address health-department concerns. The homeowner said the ADU code requires a lot-size ratio of 0.75 but their combined lot would be 0.74 and that the existing house could be designated the ADU while a new roughly 5,500-square-foot primary house would meet the ADU-size relationship (the ADU must be no more than 40% of the main home under code). The homeowner said a new septic could be installed if necessary.

A council member moved and another seconded the variance motion. After the motion was seconded, the chair called for the question and members said “aye.” The council member who will prepare paperwork said staff and a council signatory would record the parcel and that the homeowner would receive an emailed letter containing the variance.

The council did not state a roll-call vote or list individual yes/no votes on the record; the motion was carried by voice vote.

The council and the homeowner discussed follow-up steps: platting the combined parcel, recording the plat with the county, confirming driveway and setback locations, and providing the health-department approval that the homeowner said had already been obtained. Staff told the homeowner to provide plat and septic documentation when they were ready; the council indicated it could sign and record the paperwork once submitted.

The council did not change the ADU ordinance itself and did not require any additional hearings; the approval was an individual variance for the described lot and circumstances.

The homeowner thanked the council and said they may not build immediately but wanted to avoid further delay.","At a regular council meeting, members approved a variance allowing a homeowner to use accessory-dwelling-unit rules on combined parcels where the lot-size ratio is 0.74 rather than the 0.75 required by code; council directed the homeowner to record a single parcel and staff will issue a letter with the variance.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Property owner told to survey and plat to record 24-foot right-of-way for storage units and duplex access

Council approves variance to permit ADU on parcel slightly below lot-size ratio