[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6475829,"mediaKeyId","5732007-9269c2af62a80ee257605695499e6e8f","parentId",5732007,"title","Votes at a glance: Lock Haven Council approves library bylaws, solar project items, winter maintenance changes and VFW ride permit","audioSeconds",478,"startMs",1421000,"endMs",1899000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5732007-9269c2af62a80ee257605695499e6e8f&start=1421&end=1899","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5732007-9269c2af62a80ee257605695499e6e8f/thumbnail_1421000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6475829/Lock-Haven/Clinton-County/Pennsylvania/Votes-at-a-glance-Lock-Haven-Council-approves-library-bylaws-solar-project-items-winter-maintenance-changes-and-VFW-ride-permit","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6475829-f4d8ac5a573a4d5651b6d372e1934d8c/orig.mp4?Expires=1773740489&Signature=oO~abinTpcisGzj9yGKJ2m6jWR2IbvSX5tYq8oHKhe7b9EMQdOOyhVfQLr2sAubN99Bs9TWmSnOtZnU2Obwe8o1x2fnfdanPSpTxf3sURD~ftcsSJ6rHOP~oDnCf0sshVjgZFT7hoLshn0uTbVS9vBuaaRUiE6ZbMeRrCtXvTQSbwEV58XmfHFura1BG8hu1S5pFYtVD0lLVIfEwRHN8Tff1~N1cuX8nGBGWx1Em6PtpjYyT5K~-XPkfvkYDzuLqABfqsoqqrpOUswqfIWzG0SQ4z4afmA1XE9R~2I7yxc099yW6npl8EWdIu2RZp1KwKhE3YRr7mqzsYPW7Z6trrg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Lock Haven, PA","date","2025-09-08T23:00:11Z","article","The Lock Haven City Council recorded roll‑call votes on several agenda items at its September meeting. The council approved the listed items by the tallies shown in the meeting record.

Votes at a glance

- Ross Library bylaws, Ordinance 2025‑08 (second reading, with two word alteration as discussed): Outcome — approved. Roll call in the meeting record: Council member Alexander: yes; Council member Brandon: yes; Council member Brinker: no; Council member Conklin: yes; Council member Masorti: yes; Council member Stevenson: yes; Mayor Long: yes. Tally: 6 yes, 1 no.

- Tangent solar TPA amendment (retain fixed rate $0.0555/kWh; adjust buyout instead of adding escalator): Outcome — approved. Roll call recorded unanimous yes. Tally: 7 yes, 0 no.

- Easement with Tangent for underground electric connectivity (subject to incorporation of Phase 1/Phase 2 archaeological study restrictions): Outcome — approved. Roll call recorded unanimous yes. Tally: 7 yes, 0 no.

- PennDOT winter maintenance agreement, Resolution 2025‑33 (reduced route coverage: removed North Fairview Street, Susquehanna Avenue and Hill; city retains other listed streets): Outcome — approved. Roll call recorded yes votes from council members and mayor. Tally reported as unanimous in meeting record; change reduces anticipated reimbursement by roughly $7,000 for the city under the new terms.

- VFW Post 1630 memorial ride (use of streets on Oct. 4, 2025; alternate route over the levee for safety): Outcome — approved. Roll call recorded unanimous yes. Tally: 7 yes, 0 no.

Notes and context from the meeting record

- The Ross Library bylaws item was a second reading; council incorporated two specific wording changes discussed at the prior session and then voted.

- The winter maintenance agreement with PennDOT reduces the city's contracted route mileage and lowers anticipated reimbursement; staff said PennDOT can amend the agreement later if positions change but that an amendment before winter was unlikely.

- The Tangent items (TPA amendment and easement) were accompanied by staff recommendations and packet materials including archaeological studies; council required those study recommendations be incorporated into the recorded easement.

If a reader wants the full roll‑call transcript for any listed action, the meeting minutes include the verbatim names and votes as recorded at the meeting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Lock Haven City Council 2025.09.08","oneSentenceSummary","At its September meeting the Lock Haven City Council approved the Ross Library bylaws ordinance (second reading), an amendment to a Tangent solar TPA, an easement for the solar field connection, a winter maintenance agreement change with PennDOT and a VFW memorial ride route; vote tallies recorded in the minutes are listed below.","taxTitle","Lock Haven, Clinton County, Pennsylvania","taxId",71833,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6475834,"Council approves Tangent solar contract amendment and easement with archaeological conditions",460,1445000,1905000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5732007-9269c2af62a80ee257605695499e6e8f&start=1445&end=1905","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5732007-9269c2af62a80ee257605695499e6e8f/thumbnail_1445000.jpg","/articles/6475834/Lock-Haven/Clinton-County/Pennsylvania/Council-approves-Tangent-solar-contract-amendment-and-easement-with-archaeological-conditions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6475834-244460657db4f14b30fd4eb8a8507616/orig.mp4?Expires=1773740489&Signature=AhZ2Qr4XBpxJ04x0Ef6Ou~vy3PIfp0HfszwjHIMZ7jkKQFmY9J3~DgB3FsPck9bnZNVIxfhaStgMMro15UYhUtRSEo3mhIXzDajEZM7ZwI08D6MVvhfnMKGFiBUda716v7VmPO591CZmm9EwivQDvFmdlf6MKrI4tXReQgXSDeruCWXIKBRV6vUDE0~vpm1h~q0JUG7syrbcaSFNSQaOdHIpGAJHzKFDJw57G1YO0yhfVttihT~Kuwalrg-5NdhF6jlNYXZDYCtq8Q37DAl5EwXwDx3Xo6TnQ~U8KxqAOCPrTIi3wa0Y2I6ViXOiIolKyBJwl65GPqpDzdwcp3Kixg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Lock Haven City Council voted to accept Tangent's requested changes to the city's solar third‑party agreement (TPA) and to grant an easement needed to connect a planned solar field to the city's meter, after staff advised council to retain the project's original fixed electricity rate while adjusting the buyout terms.

City staff told council the original TPA fixed the price at $0.0555 per kilowatt‑hour for 25 years and included a buyout. “My recommendation to you is to go with the first option, which is to retain the 0.0555 per kilowatt hour and let them adjust the buyout option rather than adjust to an inflation escalator,” a city staff member said. Staff noted the city currently pays about $0.08764 per kilowatt‑hour under a municipal program, making the TPA's fixed rate significantly lower than current supply prices.

Council approved the amendment by roll call. The motion kept the fixed $0.0555/kWh rate and allowed Tangent to modify the buyout amount so that the city would retain the lower per‑kilowatt rate while avoiding an inflation escalator across the 25‑year term.

Separately, the council approved an easement to allow Tangent to run an underground electric line from the solar field to a city‑owned meter at a maintenance garage near the south hangars. City staff included phase 1 and phase 2 archaeological studies for the Business Park area with the council packet and recommended that any restrictions or mitigation measures identified in those studies be incorporated into the easement. Council adopted the easement with that requirement.

Why it matters: keeping a low fixed purchase rate can reduce long‑term electricity costs for city accounts tied to the project; requiring archaeological safeguards aims to prevent damage to potentially sensitive sites during construction.

Council recorded roll‑call votes approving both the TPA amendment and the easement. Questions from councilors focused on the route of the underground line, whether the archaeological surveys covered the full trench corridor and potential added costs if the cable route needed widening to avoid sensitive areas. Staff said the route could be adjusted to avoid interference with identified sites, at an incremental cost, and that the easement will require compliance with the archaeological recommendations.

Both measures passed on unanimous roll calls as shown in the meeting record; council also asked staff to ensure the easement documents explicitly incorporate the phase 1 and phase 2 study recommendations before recording the easement.","Lock Haven City Council approved an amendment to the solar third‑party agreement and granted an easement for underground electric connectivity to a new solar field, with conditions that archaeological findings from phase 1 and 2 studies be respected during work.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6475839,"Lock Haven residents press council over airport fees, fence and access after multi-year dispute",1141,116000,1257000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5732007-9269c2af62a80ee257605695499e6e8f&start=116&end=1257","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5732007-9269c2af62a80ee257605695499e6e8f/thumbnail_116000.jpg","/articles/6475839/Lock-Haven/Clinton-County/Pennsylvania/Lock-Haven-residents-press-council-over-airport-fees-fence-and-access-after-multi-year-dispute","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6475839-60cf3142d892c6e38611e4f748325c73/orig.mp4?Expires=1773740489&Signature=ZWrTNXzgHnselWMFFNXB4~jl96LtGNZOnTC~Gj1xhOiyf5pvhUpf2eqiHNzHEAwKyH9yxK1hF4uSzZ3xCYvQSiaCLGw5Pku0v707TsugDEaUZIjF6ddOGP0U1TdgDurKlS~5lC8MOXuY~sEJRNDOTfWIoWvNfp6FAOho3GzoYaDPxaCpHrlWUFT9szbm6XP9OnKQEkWNDzOBi9Ya5MKCZuypTxNfuwNxPlOvGJMm2PFnK96F~uH07az-zJGFTmb5PiZ2En0E4fwgVf8A2aXmtUXeCYtk5B8~rPkVR3jcZ7Do0ALzVRtm0TKkNoUHhsNZmVKJJxEH4HMxiFxQZSYY2w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Residents and hangar owners pressed the Lock Haven City Council on longstanding disagreements over airport tie‑down fees, temporary fencing and access during public comment at the council's September meeting.

The dispute centers on a set of fence and access rules the council says were required by the Federal Aviation Administration and the state Bureau of Aviation. “It's been 2 years, almost 2 years, maybe a little over 2 years, since we started the process on the [events],” Resident Niles said, calling the situation “costly for the city” and saying hangar owners had lost goodwill and previously provided unpaid maintenance at the field.

The council said it has offered a written agreement and that the city and county are near forming a joint authority to operate the airport. Mayor Long said council has “gone to the county. We have got an agreement with the county that we are trying to get solidified, and we have gone to the FAA.”

Why it matters: the disagreement has budget and operational implications for the city. Council members said the airport operates at a loss and federal and state grants are being used to secure the field; residents warned that continued high charges risk driving private users away. The council also warned that failure to sign the offered agreement could result in locked access for some property owners.

Council and commenters described several concrete points of contention. Resident Niles and other hangar owners argued that if the city had applied FAA tie‑down fee guidelines earlier, the airport would have collected more revenue. Niles proposed arbitration paid by the parties, saying hanger owners were willing to accept an arbitrator's decision. Council members rejected arbitration in favor of the written agreement: “We have a solution. It's been given to you and you don't like it,” Mayor Long said. Several council members said they were not willing to fund or pursue arbitration.

Council also cited an FAA and Bureau of Aviation finding that the airport was not secure while a temporary orange fence remained down. Council said the state and federal agencies have directed installation of a city‑owned fence, and that federal and state grant funds will pay for the work. “The bureau specifically asked you, who took the fence down then?” a council speaker said during the exchange. The speaker said no one answered and characterized the missing temporary fence as proof that the airport was not secure.

Commenters pushed back that the airport serves more than hangar owners: museum visitors, spraying operations and other users were cited as broader beneficiaries of the field. “Somewhere around 3,000 guests came in and used the airport to visit the museum,” one commenter said, arguing for the airport's positive economic impact.

No formal council action was recorded on the record at this meeting to change fees; council repeated that the written agreement is the path to continued access and that new, permanent fencing will be installed consistent with FAA direction. Council members said the city is pursuing a joint county–city authority to manage the airport, and that failing to sign the offered agreement could leave some property owners without access.

Looking ahead: council members said they will continue work on the proposed joint authority and on installing a permanent, city‑owned fence using federal and state grant funds. Several council members expressed frustration at repeated appearances on the topic and urged the participants to accept the written agreement to avoid further lockouts or enforcement actions.","Residents and hangar owners urged the Lock Haven City Council to resolve a multi-year dispute over tie‑down fees, temporary fencing and access to the municipal airport; council members said an agreement was offered and that federal and state aviation agencies directed installation of a city‑owned fence.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Lock Haven Council approves library bylaws, solar project items, winter maintenance changes and VFW ride permit

Council approves Tangent solar contract amendment and easement with archaeological conditions

Lock Haven residents press council over airport fees, fence and access after multi-year dispute