[{"_1":2,"_98":-5,"_99":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6130261,"mediaKeyId","5740802-e681e850612aac795de7680d152f8fef","parentId",5740802,"title","Committee discusses wastewater approach; members favor closed collection systems for some areas","audioSeconds",36,"startMs",293685,"endMs",330414,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5740802-e681e850612aac795de7680d152f8fef&start=293&end=330","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5740802-e681e850612aac795de7680d152f8fef/thumbnail_293685.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6130261/Livingston-Parish/Louisiana/Committee-discusses-wastewater-approach-members-favor-closed-collection-systems-for-some-areas","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6130261-e61331f794f765bac1b578672ae1e556/orig.mp4?Expires=1775400409&Signature=PoamyICoaSpt5d592fH2OXrympUR2k3OVQY6ceO2xLVquWdMm5OkDVtPgDFE3tAReCo6wen6ElWFoO30gZGmSafhGcpEeh57QhhN9eF2fp8WSH~SRVVIkLNxW0oGpfEULiu~HDYzppgSbHQUAXHvJO-HOrwA3CtnAJviyPCaiBV0Qjd16O8bC7OuB5zqJXhEe6I8OKvmH0FpMnqY1dTMrERqexAUZj5LMnoyD2mctd6mLH8C-2DknCDYGROhtSkbPvSLd3tvJ0KHBpHCOeQEP~5x08tPkZ726TaItuxsxBHC4RIwRKUorATxrGF6gkaq6ZTGZvrSUrUQa0p204w9IQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Livingston Parish Council","date","2025-09-09T03:43:00Z","article","At the Livingston Parish Master Plan Committee meeting (date not specified), members flagged page 60 of the updated master plan and discussed wastewater infrastructure needs and collection system options for parts of the parish.

Committee member Gerald asked that wastewater be added to the next meeting agenda. Several members said a parish‑level wastewater master plan is recommended by the updated master plan and that certain areas currently need sewer collection lines immediately.

Members debated closed collection systems (vacuum or pressurized) versus traditional gravity systems with lift stations. One committee member who described prior work at an engineering firm said closed systems can be cheaper long term because they prevent stormwater inflow and reduce the volume treated at centralized plants. That member cited the city of Biloxi as an example where a pump‑based system allowed a faster recovery after flooding and kept the system operational as power returned.

Why it matters: sewer system design affects treatment plant sizing, environmental outcomes and the parish’s exposure to state or federal sanctions related to wastewater discharges. The committee noted that closed systems reduce stormwater infiltration that can overwhelm gravity systems and increase plant loads.

Committee members also discussed practical considerations: vendor and parts inventories, specification of check valves and other components, the need for design standards, ownership and maintenance responsibilities for in‑home or on‑lot equipment, and potential ordinance changes to define municipal and owner obligations. One speaker noted modern pumps are variable‑speed and can be integrated with alarms to notify homeowners of faults.

Ending: No formal vote was taken. Gerald said he will add 2025 capital outlay (House Bill 2) and wastewater to the next agenda and provide a written breakout of state capital outlay receipts to the committee. Staff and the infrastructure committee are expected to coordinate next steps and identify funding and design proposals for a parish wastewater master plan.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Master Plan Review Discussion 9 8 25","oneSentenceSummary","Committee members reviewed the master plan’s wastewater section and discussed sewer options, with several members expressing support for closed (vacuum or pressurized) collection systems in parts of the parish, citing lower long‑term costs and better performance in flood conditions.","taxTitle","Livingston Parish, Louisiana","taxId",12941,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6130266,"Committee reviews transportation plan, road classification work and complete‑streets tradeoffs",12,172006,184309,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5740802-e681e850612aac795de7680d152f8fef&start=172&end=184","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5740802-e681e850612aac795de7680d152f8fef/thumbnail_172006.jpg","/articles/6130266/Livingston-Parish/Louisiana/Committee-reviews-transportation-plan-road-classification-work-and-completestreets-tradeoffs","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6130266-4863929e8a0b1eaa1e124f75c848b154/orig.mp4?Expires=1775400409&Signature=V96qnyvNzKVCPfN8M6oO-fvjoX7cPDiFbRqxmAcHV9cb716cYKLfSevIuFdeq5fsbzXNExyEp5WoxgdhZgfyLu9JZle-O4rCKBEmaG8lWyvX1RJkEkQpphxGL~tzxxu9PaBGfIQHf4P7RV1VPBFxSxXm-6wMSQ8iTAcB9PPw7nkn~YyQEwGSOWUHe2UYHfgql8ZARkPvFT9JCXzrVgyMgdNLEto5uFk~qkxRKJoTV0wXvqsIVud-EFtN2ksM1CB0KU5MM8HQZzGvcb~QLvte6Vr3n9Ta~SG0LCsqbpruNufepRntjzGCfHnbDLd~V13icOl2a552A2Mo1NNQdPoJ6Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Members of the Livingston Parish Master Plan Committee reviewed the initial draft of a master transportation plan and discussed how the plan’s road classifications, bonding strategy and complete‑streets policies would be implemented.

The chair (name not specified) told members the parish has purchased detailed road scans (GPR) and that those data will be overlaid to help classify roads so the parish can compete for funding. The chair said the council and administration have earmarked candidate projects for bonding and that Jim Ryan (role not specified) would analyze bond timing to seek favorable market conditions.

Why it matters: road classification affects eligibility for state and federal grants; the parish’s backlog of roads and bond timing will influence how quickly repairs and new connections can be funded and built.

Committee members discussed key features of the draft transportation plan, including new connectors to reduce dead‑end streets, safety improvements at deteriorating intersections, and higher‑flow limited‑access corridors intended to move traffic across the parish. The chair said the plan includes projects already in progress by parish staff.

Members highlighted a recent machine‑driven road survey system that grades pavement condition (A/B/C/D) and noted the classification output is required to prioritize projects for bonding and outside funding. The committee asked for the list of candidate roads to be shared with members so they can do research and prepare input.

The group then discussed complete‑streets elements — sidewalks, dedicated bike lanes, multiuse paths, ADA‑compliant crossings and landscaping such as rain gardens. Several members said complete streets make sense in denser, municipal or suburban corridors but questioned applying full complete‑streets treatments uniformly across rural parish roads because of high costs, long time horizons for use, and limited grant funding.

One member explained tradeoffs between open‑ditch drainage and subsurface drainage: subsurface drainage allows narrower right‑of‑way for a given road cross‑section but costs more upfront. Members suggested a targeted approach: apply complete‑streets standards to municipally served corridors, evacuation routes, and areas slated for economic development while using simpler retrofit approaches elsewhere.

Ending: The committee did not take formal action. The chair said he will circulate the transportation plan materials to committee members and that the infrastructure committee and administration are coordinating bond planning; members asked staff to invite parish staff (Robert) to the next meeting to discuss technical details and funding lists.","The committee discussed a draft master transportation plan that includes road reclassifications based on GPR scans, a candidate list for bond funding, and concerns about the cost and applicability of complete‑streets elements in the rural parish.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":91,"_47":92,"_49":93,"_51":94,"_53":95,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":96,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":97,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6130271,"Committee: Master plan maps are final for this cycle; revisions possible later",0,90005,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5740802-e681e850612aac795de7680d152f8fef&start=90&end=90","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5740802-e681e850612aac795de7680d152f8fef/thumbnail_90005.jpg","/articles/6130271/Livingston-Parish/Louisiana/Committee-Master-plan-maps-are-final-for-this-cycle-revisions-possible-later","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6130271-1b49313a5534adfd8e0e52943ac094cb/orig.mp4?Expires=1775400409&Signature=gwgzFEIn-73UJkl7oglgP-cPWoNLVKilkGJIREjJPpCeKXuflCbyGXQ7Pohn5eiEC1rHzjJ787~EBIJzYj42hpT1oFmxdNVDW2OnpoOdIjcHynMRHJIBG0Tm1s9bRQEaihFWq-J9aGTMlaVugztqebdaFx4AgNjJSJFMPbydyf7G3NBQtl~vNAFUh2URhk~mds~5gTjJp~IhyecIpOF60xQePXVOC0ZGdXlIKWb1PFjpTv6TegQ2h5tKPO9WkJsQqQS3Z2fKM2jPhl4rp9wakxRJkQ3YajRg-NTy9Pmj0O207cYKAQhymGz-RCse-0m~qg0I5ckRvwDTuQa4IJK4Dg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","At a meeting of the Livingston Parish Master Plan Committee (date not specified), committee members reviewed the updated master plan and future land‑use map released by consultant WSP and discussed next steps now that the update cycle is complete. Committee members said the planning department and the Planning Commission will carry the approved maps forward to the Parish Council for final action.

The committee’s chair (name not specified) summarized the immediate status: “It’s out for consumption right now… It’s out. It’s over. It’s all been a matter of being approved,” and noted the Planning Commission approves by resolution and the council will act by order. The chair added that the master plan is “a living, breathing document” and can be modified after this approval cycle.

Why it matters: the future land‑use map guides where the parish anticipates residential, commercial, industrial and mixed‑use development, and rezoning requests typically are evaluated against that map.

Committee members described a sequence of approvals and limits for this cycle. The chair said the draft will appear before the Planning Commission in early October and then move to the Parish Council. Several members said substantial changes cannot be made in this cycle; major revisions would require additional consultant work, while smaller edits can be made later by the Planning Department or through the Planning Commission process.

Discussion focused on an earlier committee letter about extending an economic corridor northward and how that letter was handled by the Planning Commission. Committee member Gerald said the committee’s letter was sent to the Planning Commission but was not incorporated into the approved maps and that the commission tabled some recommendations. Gerald asked that the committee prepare a more detailed follow‑up letter; the chair said he will circulate a draft to members before the next meeting.

Committee members also debated high‑density residential designations (R‑4, R‑5 and some planned unit developments) along proposed corridors. One member said opponents at the Planning Commission were not 100% opposed to the corridor concept but were concerned that high‑density housing be placed later in a priority list. The committee agreed it can submit prioritized recommendations—for example, industrial and mixed‑use with commercial and professional frontage first—and that those recommendations can be considered after the plan cycle.

The committee discussed public participation and asked staff to create accessible exhibits for the public before the next meeting. The chair said the committee’s role is to work issues out before they reach the Planning Commission and council and encouraged members to solicit public review of the areas they want to change.

The group identified page 60 of the updated master plan, which addresses wastewater infrastructure, as an item to add to the next meeting agenda for separate discussion.

Ending: No formal motions or votes were recorded at this meeting on the master plan; the committee agreed to prepare and circulate a revised recommendation on the economic corridor and to include public exhibits ahead of the next meeting.","Members of the Livingston Parish Master Plan Committee said the updated master plan and land‑use map have completed this update cycle and will go to the Planning Commission and Parish Council for approval, but the group emphasized the plan can be changed later and discussed sending a revised recommendation on the economic corridor.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Committee discusses wastewater approach; members favor closed collection systems for some areas

Committee reviews transportation plan, road classification work and complete‑streets tradeoffs

Committee: Master plan maps are final for this cycle; revisions possible later