The Coconino County Board of Supervisors meeting on September 9, 2025, highlighted a significant discussion regarding the terminology used to describe the original inhabitants of the region. The debate centered around the terms "Native American" and "Indigenous," with various perspectives shared by board members and community representatives.

The meeting began with a review of a document that recommended using "Native American" for consistency with federal law. However, several participants expressed concerns about this choice, arguing that it does not fully encompass the identity of those living in urban areas who identify as Indigenous. One board member emphasized the importance of terminology, stating, "Words are meaningful. Words are powerful," and called for a deeper discussion on the implications of these terms.

Community members voiced their preference for the term "Indigenous," citing its broader recognition and alignment with international human rights standards. They argued that this term better reflects the identity of individuals who may not reside on tribal lands but still identify with their cultural heritage. One participant noted that over 50% of Indigenous people in the area live in urban settings, further supporting the need for inclusive language.

The conversation also touched on the historical context of these terms, with some participants highlighting a spectrum of colonialism associated with the terminology. The term "Indian" was described as the most colonial, while "Indigenous" was seen as a progressive term that acknowledges the rights and identities of these communities.

As the meeting progressed, board members discussed the possibility of using both terms in the document—"Native American" in formal contexts and "Indigenous" in more general references. This compromise aimed to respect both legal frameworks and the community's preference for self-identification.

In conclusion, the meeting underscored the importance of language in shaping identity and community relations. The board's decision on terminology will likely influence how Coconino County engages with its Indigenous population moving forward. The discussions are expected to continue as the board seeks to finalize the document, reflecting the diverse perspectives of the community it serves.