During the recent City Commission meeting held on September 8, 2025, in Pittsburg, community members voiced significant concerns regarding property taxes and the financial burden on residents, particularly the elderly. The discussions centered around the implications of rising property valuations and the potential for increased taxes, despite the mill levy remaining unchanged.

One resident emphasized the need for the city to prioritize support for its older population, stating, "It's time we start taking care of the older generation here in Pittsburg." This sentiment resonated with many attendees who expressed frustration over the financial strain that rising property taxes impose on fixed-income individuals. The speaker argued that the city could afford to lower the mill levy, suggesting a reduction of two mills, which could alleviate some of the financial pressure on residents.

Another resident, Roger Lomcek, presented real-world examples illustrating the impact of property tax increases on local homeowners. He highlighted that two homes in different neighborhoods would see a tax increase of approximately 6% this year, translating to an additional burden of $352.54 for one homeowner and $174 for another. Lomcek pointed out that while the mill levy itself may not change, the actual taxes residents pay are increasing due to rising property valuations, which contradicts the intent of the revenue neutral law designed to maintain tax rates.

The discussion also touched on the city's financial reserves, with estimates indicating that the combined general and utility funds hold around $11.6 million, significantly exceeding the ideal minimum reserves. This surplus raised questions about the necessity of increasing property taxes when the city appears to have ample funds.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that the community is calling for a reevaluation of the city's financial strategies, particularly in how they affect vulnerable populations. The commission faces the challenge of balancing fiscal responsibility with the needs of its residents, especially those on fixed incomes who are struggling to keep up with rising costs. The outcomes of these discussions will likely influence future decisions regarding property taxes and community support initiatives.